Representation of the People (Election Expenses Exclusion) (Amendment) Order 2019 Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate
Department: Cabinet Office

Representation of the People (Election Expenses Exclusion) (Amendment) Order 2019

Lord Kennedy of Southwark Excerpts
Thursday 14th February 2019

(5 years, 2 months ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Lord Shipley Portrait Lord Shipley (LD)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I thank the Minister for explaining this order and I want to record that I agree with it. It is entirely appropriate that any disability-related expenses in elections should be exempt from spending limits, on principle. That is because it helps disabled candidates to stand for election on equal terms with others. I noted the Minister’s comments about some objections that may have been raised on some of the details—but none is more important than the overall principle of equality of opportunity.

Lord Kennedy of Southwark Portrait Lord Kennedy of Southwark (Lab Co-op)
- Hansard - -

My Lords, I am very happy to give the order my full support. I was glad that the noble Lord mentioned the political parties panel, because I was going to ask him about it. There is no mention of political parties at all in the consultation referred to in the Explanatory Memorandum. I know that the noble Lord mentioned it in his contribution, because I was going to ask him about it. The bodies listed in the Explanatory Memorandum do not pay election expenses and do not fill out election returns. I am glad that he covered that point. It is important that we keep the political parties informed on all these matters. They can often inform the Government’s thinking in a positive and helpful way. Since the noble Lord answered my question, that is fine. I am very happy to support the order.

Lord Young of Cookham Portrait Lord Young of Cookham
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

My Lords, I have had a remarkably easy time—oh, I am sorry.