Brexit: World Trade Organization Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate

Lord Kinnock

Main Page: Lord Kinnock (Labour - Life peer)

Brexit: World Trade Organization

Lord Kinnock Excerpts
Wednesday 11th October 2017

(6 years, 7 months ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
Baroness Sugg Portrait Baroness Sugg
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

Yes, absolutely. We are discussing agriculture, as well as many other issues, with our partners. It will take time—we were expecting that—but we are committed to working constructively and openly with our partners. As I say, the aim is to replicate our existing trading regime as far as possible.

Lord Kinnock Portrait Lord Kinnock (Lab)
- Hansard - -

My Lords, a hard Brexit—indicated as a possibility, or in some cases, a preference, by the Prime Minister this week—means that in that event, our country would be entirely dependent on the WTO rules regime. In view of that reality and the potential damage it would cause to agriculture and several other industries in this country—not even mentioning that that regime does not extend to services, upon which our economy depends—can the Minister give us a much clearer understanding of the Government’s planning for the event of us being dependent on the WTO regime so that, at least in this respect, the obscurity that is now characteristic of the Government in their dealings with the EU is at least diminished?

Baroness Sugg Portrait Baroness Sugg
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

An agreed deal with the European Union is a mutually beneficial choice and we are confident that we can achieve that. But as the Prime Minister said, while we think that that is by far and away the highest probability, we have a duty to plan for the alternative, and that is exactly what we are doing, in detail.