Defence and Security Review (NATO) Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate
Department: Ministry of Defence

Defence and Security Review (NATO)

Lord Robathan Excerpts
Monday 2nd March 2015

(9 years, 2 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Rory Stewart Portrait Rory Stewart
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I am very supportive of the idea that we should be spending even more.

Lord Robathan Portrait Mr Andrew Robathan (South Leicestershire) (Con)
- Hansard - -

So am I, if I may say so. My hon. Friend is giving an excellent analysis of the situation. At the NATO summit, Britain was at the forefront of demanding that all NATO countries use 2% of GDP for defence spending. I absolutely support the Prime Minister on this. We want to spend 2% of GDP. Personally, I would rather go further and spend more.

Rory Stewart Portrait Rory Stewart
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

To come to a conclusion, I am giving the four reasons why we need to spend 2%. The first, which has just been pointed out by the former Defence Minister, my right hon. Friend the Member for South Leicestershire (Mr Robathan), is UK credibility. The UK led the push for 2% at the Wales summit only six months ago. We stood alongside the United States and went around every other country at the summit saying, “If you’re going be serious, you have to commit 2%.” We emphasised again and again that we were spending 2% of our GDP on defence and that they should spend 2% of their GDP on defence. That was very important in getting a range of countries to commit to spending 2% of GDP on defence over the next five to 10 years. The first reason why we must do it is simply out of a sense of shame. The honour and credibility of the United Kingdom are bound up in this.