Cycling: Licences and Insurance Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate

Lord Robathan

Main Page: Lord Robathan (Conservative - Life peer)
Monday 18th March 2019

(5 years, 1 month ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
Baroness Barran Portrait Baroness Barran
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

The noble Lord makes a number of very fair points. The Government obviously want to reinforce safety for all road users, particularly those described as vulnerable road users, including pedestrians and cyclists. He will be aware that there was a review of cycling and walking safety, and licensing and insurance were considered as part of that. Over 3 million new cycles are sold each year. Licensing and insurance would require the establishment of a central register, and the Government’s view is that this would be very cumbersome and expensive to administer. There is evidence that other countries that have trialled these schemes have then withdrawn them. The Government have committed, through the cycling and walking investment strategy, to a 50-point plan and £2 billion of investment to improve safety for all road users.

Lord Robathan Portrait Lord Robathan (Con)
- Hansard - -

My Lords, should we not consider whether we wish to encourage cycling for the health benefits that it gives, and indeed its advantages regarding reduced congestion, or whether we wish to deter cyclists—I declare an interest as a former chairman of the All-Party Parliamentary Cycling Group—with unnecessary regulation that would keep the police busy for the next 100 years?