Constitutional Convention Bill [HL] Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate
Department: Cabinet Office

Constitutional Convention Bill [HL]

Lord Trefgarne Excerpts
Friday 17th July 2015

(8 years, 10 months ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Lord Trefgarne Portrait Lord Trefgarne (Con)
- Hansard - -

My Lords, I apologise for not having put my name on the list. I will detail your Lordships for only a very few moments.

I share many of the reservations that have been expressed about the Bill by those who have already spoken, in particular my noble friends Lord Forsyth and Lord Norton. I believe firmly that a major constitutional event such as is anticipated in the Bill ought to be a public Bill, not a Private Member’s Bill considered on a Friday afternoon towards the end of the term. It should be a major public event, which this Bill most certainly is not.

I will touch briefly on one of the issues contained in the schedule of items to be discussed; namely, House of Lords reform. I ask your Lordships whether House of Lords reform is really best considered and recommended upon by representatives of local government or from the regions, or even from a political party that does not have a representative in either House. I think not. We can explore some of these issues when and if we get to Committee on the Bill, and I shall look forward to taking part in that process.