All 1 Maggie Throup contributions to the Local Audit (Public Access to Documents) Act 2017

Read Bill Ministerial Extracts

Fri 24th Mar 2017
Local Audit (Public Access to Documents) Bill
Commons Chamber

3rd reading: House of Commons & Report stage: House of Commons

Local Audit (Public Access to Documents) Bill Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate

Maggie Throup

Main Page: Maggie Throup (Conservative - Erewash)

Local Audit (Public Access to Documents) Bill

Maggie Throup Excerpts
3rd reading: House of Commons & Report stage: House of Commons
Friday 24th March 2017

(7 years, 1 month ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Local Audit (Public Access to Documents) Act 2017 Read Hansard Text Amendment Paper: Consideration of Bill Amendments as at 24 March 2017 - (24 Mar 2017)
Christopher Chope Portrait Mr Chope
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I do not hold myself up as an expert on the Freedom of Information Act, but local authorities are subject to it, just like any other public body. Freedom of information depends on being able to know what question to ask. Quite often, it is only when one looks at the accounts, or documents relating to the accounts, that we know what question to ask. Freedom of information powers can be more potent because they can be exercised at any time and the local authority is under an obligation to respond within, I think, 20 days or a reasonable period. They can be more potent, but the base information that enables people to understand what questions they really want to ask can probably be ascertained only by inspecting the documents.

Maggie Throup Portrait Maggie Throup (Erewash) (Con)
- Hansard - -

I am not an expert, but I would think that a freedom of information request is more costly to a council than what is proposed in the Bill. Perhaps a balance on cost-effectiveness needs to be taken into consideration, too.