Lord Mandelson: Response to Humble Address Motion Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate
Department: Cabinet Office

Lord Mandelson: Response to Humble Address Motion

Martin Wrigley Excerpts
Wednesday 11th March 2026

(1 day, 9 hours ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Watch Debate Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Darren Jones Portrait Darren Jones
- View Speech - Hansard - - - Excerpts

The Prime Minister has apologised for appointing Peter Mandelson as the ambassador to the United States. He believed the lies that Peter Mandelson put to him in response to questions about his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein. As soon as all of us, including the Prime Minister, became aware that those were indeed lies, with the publication of the documents from Bloomberg and the United States Department of Justice, he was dismissed promptly.

Martin Wrigley Portrait Martin Wrigley (Newton Abbot) (LD)
- View Speech - Hansard - -

In my investigations into Palantir, it has been brought to my attention that 20 years ago Peter Mandelson was lobbying the Government very hard to take on board a strategic supplier from the United States that was not an obvious choice at the time. That sort of decision is something that a financier like Epstein would have taken advantage of and made money from. We see the same things with influence and persuasion from Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor. Will the Government commit to following the money and the money trail to ensure that we are not continuing to pay into Epstein’s estate through the deals that we are doing with large American contractors such as Palantir?

Darren Jones Portrait Darren Jones
- View Speech - Hansard - - - Excerpts

I am not familiar with the details of the case the hon. Gentleman raises, but if he wishes to write to me with those details, I can commit to him that we will look at them.