To match an exact phrase, use quotation marks around the search term. eg. "Parliamentary Estate". Use "OR" or "AND" as link words to form more complex queries.


Keep yourself up-to-date with the latest developments by exploring our subscription options to receive notifications direct to your inbox

Written Question
Children: Maintenance
Tuesday 6th March 2018

Asked by: Meg Hillier (Labour (Co-op) - Hackney South and Shoreditch)

Question to the Department for Work and Pensions:

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, what steps her Department takes to ensure that child maintenance payments are paid by non-resident parents; and what steps her Department takes to support the resident parent.

Answered by Kit Malthouse

We have a range of strong enforcement powers intended to ensure paying parents fulfil their financial responsibilities towards their children, and therefore help support receiving parents. These powers include deducting maintenance directly from earnings, sharing information about non-compliance with credit reference agencies, instructing bailiffs to collect arrears or seize goods, forcing the sale of property, commitment to prison and disqualification from driving.

We have also recently consulted on a new compliance and arrears strategy aimed at further increasing our compliance and enforcement powers.


Written Question
Children: Maintenance
Monday 5th March 2018

Asked by: Meg Hillier (Labour (Co-op) - Hackney South and Shoreditch)

Question to the Department for Work and Pensions:

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, whether there are plans to reduce the amount of debt that a child maintenance paying parent owes before an application for a Liability Order can be made.

Answered by Kit Malthouse

The minimum amount for which a liability order will usually be sought is £500. This is intended to ensure that our use of this power is proportionate to the cost of applying for a liability order. This threshold is discretionary, and we may apply for liability orders for lower amounts depending on the specific circumstances of a case.


Written Question
Social Security Benefits: Appeals
Tuesday 18th April 2017

Asked by: Meg Hillier (Labour (Co-op) - Hackney South and Shoreditch)

Question to the Department for Work and Pensions:

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, how many mandatory reconsideration request decisions made by his Department have been overturned by HM Courts and Tribunals Service since the introduction of that process.

Answered by Penny Mordaunt

The information is not held.


Speech in Westminster Hall - Tue 23 Feb 2016
Under-occupancy Penalty

"This issue is big in my constituency of Hackney South and Shoreditch. There is an invidious part to this tax. If two children are of an age when they are supposed to share a bedroom, but one is within reach of their next birthday, when they would qualify for their …..."
Meg Hillier - View Speech

View all Meg Hillier (LAB - Hackney South and Shoreditch) contributions to the debate on: Under-occupancy Penalty

Speech in Westminster Hall - Tue 23 Feb 2016
Under-occupancy Penalty

"In parts of London we are seeing people pushing to get two-bedroom properties because they are frightened they will be hit by the bedroom tax, but that also reduces, if there was availability, the stock for people to move down to, if they have the extra bedroom, so it causes …..."
Meg Hillier - View Speech

View all Meg Hillier (LAB - Hackney South and Shoreditch) contributions to the debate on: Under-occupancy Penalty

Speech in Westminster Hall - Tue 23 Feb 2016
Under-occupancy Penalty

"My hon. Friend is rightly highlighting the practical difficulties and the unfairness of the policy. Does he think that the fact that there is not a single Government Back Bencher present suggests that there is not widespread support for its implementation, even if it is Government policy?..."
Meg Hillier - View Speech

View all Meg Hillier (LAB - Hackney South and Shoreditch) contributions to the debate on: Under-occupancy Penalty

Speech in Westminster Hall - Tue 23 Feb 2016
Under-occupancy Penalty

"It is a pleasure to serve under your chairmanship, Ms Dorries. I had not expected to speak today, but I felt moved to do so because of the huge impact of the bedroom tax on my constituents. In Hoxton, on the Wenlock Barn estate alone, 74 households out of several …..."
Meg Hillier - View Speech

View all Meg Hillier (LAB - Hackney South and Shoreditch) contributions to the debate on: Under-occupancy Penalty

Speech in Westminster Hall - Tue 23 Feb 2016
Under-occupancy Penalty

"rose..."
Meg Hillier - View Speech

View all Meg Hillier (LAB - Hackney South and Shoreditch) contributions to the debate on: Under-occupancy Penalty

Speech in Westminster Hall - Tue 23 Feb 2016
Under-occupancy Penalty

"The Minister made a point earlier about people being allocated oversized properties to start with. He has also talked about under-occupying by people whose children have left home. However, they are different from people whose life circumstances are fluctuating—their income has fluctuated; their children’s ages are changing. They are living …..."
Meg Hillier - View Speech

View all Meg Hillier (LAB - Hackney South and Shoreditch) contributions to the debate on: Under-occupancy Penalty

Written Question
Pension Credit
Thursday 28th January 2016

Asked by: Meg Hillier (Labour (Co-op) - Hackney South and Shoreditch)

Question to the Department for Work and Pensions:

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, if he will make it his policy to enable special circumstances to be taken into account when making the decision to withhold pension credit to people who are away from their homes for a period of more than four weeks.

Answered by Justin Tomlinson

It is the intention to amend the Pension Credit temporary absence from Great Britain rules from April 2016. The temporary absence rules allow entitlement to Pension Credit to continue where under normal conditions it would not do so.


We are planning for a general rule which will allow Pension Credit to remain payable for absences not exceeding four weeks. We intend to have exceptions to the general rule to cater for bereavement or medical treatment. Where the absence from Great Britain is in connection with a bereavement concerning a partner or close relative then entitlement to Pension Credit may continue for absences not exceeding eight weeks. Where the absence from Great Britain is in order to receive medical treatment then entitlement to Pension Credit may continue for absences not exceeding 26 weeks.


These changes do not affect the Pension Credit rules covering absences from home within Great Britain.