Early Day Motion
Public inquiry into Epstein links
(73 Signatures)
5 Feb 2026
Tabled by:
Nadia Whittome (Labour - Nottingham East)
That this House stands with Jeffrey Epstein’s victims whose relentless courage and pursuit of justice has led to the publication of the Epstein files; notes with concern the number of British public figures included in these files; recognises that child sexual abuse on this scale is likely to have involved …
Division Vote (Commons)
4 Feb 2026 - Climate Change -
View Vote Context
Nadia Whittome (Lab) voted Aye
- in line with the party majority
and in line with the House
One of
316 Labour Aye votes vs
0 Labour No votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 392 Noes - 116
Written Question
Wednesday 4th February 2026
Asked by:
Nadia Whittome (Labour - Nottingham East)
Question
to the Department of Health and Social Care:
To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what assessment he has made of the potential merits of a) waiving and b) subsidising the cost of the first six to eight (i) preliminary and (ii) core examinations for junior doctors.
Answered by Karin Smyth
- Minister of State (Department of Health and Social Care)
The Department of Health and Social Care has indicated that it will not be possible to answer this question within the usual time period. An answer is being prepared and will be provided as soon as it is available.
Speech in Commons Chamber - Tue 03 Feb 2026
Universal Credit (Removal of Two Child Limit) Bill
"The shadow Secretary of State must know that the vast majority of families in poverty include at least one adult in work. She asks how this Bill is being paid for. Well, it is being paid for by increased taxes on gambling giants. Would it not be more truthful to …..."Nadia Whittome - View Speech
View all Nadia Whittome (Lab - Nottingham East) contributions to the debate on: Universal Credit (Removal of Two Child Limit) Bill
Speech in Commons Chamber - Tue 03 Feb 2026
Universal Credit (Removal of Two Child Limit) Bill
"The introduction of the two-child limit by the Conservatives in 2017 has had a devastating impact on child poverty rates. Every day, it affects 1.7 million children, with a loss of roughly £3,500 a year for affected families. A huge 17% of children in my constituency live in families subject …..."Nadia Whittome - View Speech
View all Nadia Whittome (Lab - Nottingham East) contributions to the debate on: Universal Credit (Removal of Two Child Limit) Bill
Speech in Commons Chamber - Tue 03 Feb 2026
Universal Credit (Removal of Two Child Limit) Bill
"I thank the right hon. Member for that intervention. I agree with the points that he made, particularly because, from my constituency inbox, huge numbers of constituents are effectively evicted because landlords keep hiking their rents. That is why I back his call, and the calls of Sadiq Khan and …..."Nadia Whittome - View Speech
View all Nadia Whittome (Lab - Nottingham East) contributions to the debate on: Universal Credit (Removal of Two Child Limit) Bill
Division Vote (Commons)
3 Feb 2026 - Universal Credit (Removal of Two Child Limit) Bill -
View Vote Context
Nadia Whittome (Lab) voted Aye
- in line with the party majority
and in line with the House
One of
358 Labour Aye votes vs
0 Labour No votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 458 Noes - 104
Written Question
Tuesday 3rd February 2026
Asked by:
Nadia Whittome (Labour - Nottingham East)
Question
to the Department of Health and Social Care:
To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what assessment he has made of the adequacy of redundancy arrangements for NHS staff who take partial retirement.
Answered by Karin Smyth
- Minister of State (Department of Health and Social Care)
This specific assessment has not been made. Where National Health Service staff have taken partial retirement, they retain continuous service. As a result, some staff may be entitled to receive a statutory redundancy payment that exceeds their contractual redundancy entitlement, in which case, the statutory payment will apply. Entitlement to redundancy payments ultimately depends on what is set out in an employee’s employment contract and whether their contract refers to Section 16 of the Agenda for Change terms. Different rules may apply to NHS staff who are not employed on Agenda for Change terms in England.
Contractual redundancy provisions for staff covered by the NHS Terms and Conditions of Service handbook, also referred to as Agenda for Change, were agreed and ratified in partnership by the NHS Staff Council, the collective bargaining structure made up of trade union and employer representatives. Any future changes to the handbook, including this section, would require the Department to issue a mandate to allow negotiations to be undertaken by the NHS Staff Council.
Written Question
Thursday 29th January 2026
Asked by:
Nadia Whittome (Labour - Nottingham East)
Question
to the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs:
To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, what assessment she made of the potential impact of electric shock collars on the welfare of dogs.
Answered by Angela Eagle
- Minister of State (Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs)
The Government is concerned about the possible welfare implications of the use of electric shock collars.
As set out in the Animal Welfare Strategy, Defra will consult on whether to ban the use of electric shock collars later in this Parliament.
Division Vote (Commons)
28 Jan 2026 - Youth Unemployment -
View Vote Context
Nadia Whittome (Lab) voted No
- in line with the party majority
and in line with the House
One of
280 Labour No votes vs
0 Labour Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 91 Noes - 287