Public Authorities (Fraud, Error and Recovery) Bill

Debate between Neil Duncan-Jordan and Caroline Nokes
Richard Burgon Portrait Richard Burgon (Leeds East) (Lab)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I congratulate my hon. Friend on his eminently reasonable and common-sense approach to this debate and on amendment 11. Does it seem to him, as it seems to me, that this legislation takes place in a wider context? Along with the proposed tightening of eligibility for personal independence payment, it moves us towards a hostile environment for benefit claimants, particularly disabled benefit claimants. We will end up treating them as suspects automatically. Does he agree that it was right for us to oppose this measure when the Conservatives wanted to do it? I tabled an early-day motion, signed by nearly 50 MPs, to that effect. We have to oppose this measure now. The best way to resolve it is by the Government accepting his eminently reasonable—

Caroline Nokes Portrait Madam Deputy Speaker (Caroline Nokes)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

Order. That was a very long intervention. Perhaps we would be better off going back to Neil Duncan-Jordan.

Neil Duncan-Jordan Portrait Neil Duncan-Jordan
- Hansard - -

I thank my hon. Friend for his intervention. I will cover the connection between this piece of legislation and the Green Paper shortly.