Oral Answers to Questions Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate

Nic Dakin

Main Page: Nic Dakin (Labour - Scunthorpe)

Oral Answers to Questions

Nic Dakin Excerpts
Thursday 12th July 2012

(11 years, 10 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
Charles Hendry Portrait Charles Hendry
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I do not agree with Professor Hughes, and neither does the Committee on Climate Change or the Centre for Energy Policy and Technology at Imperial college. One of the main differences is the assessment of how much wind might be necessary, and we believe that the professor has overestimated that by a third, which automatically reduces the cost by £30 billion. Furthermore, he has not looked at the range of alternative back-up provisions, including interconnectors, or at the likely price of gas in the future.

Nic Dakin Portrait Nic Dakin (Scunthorpe) (Lab)
- Hansard - -

What steps are the Government taking to ensure that capital investment in wind monopiles will result in manufacturing taking place in the UK using UK steel, so that UK energy bill payers and UK taxpayers can fund UK jobs?

Charles Hendry Portrait Charles Hendry
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

The hon. Gentleman raises a critical point. We have secured agreement with the offshore wind industry that it will work to ensure that 50% of the supply chain involves UK companies, compared with perhaps 10% in the early projects. We want this to be a real industrial policy that brings help to constituencies, such as his, that have a great industrial heritage. We want this to be a joined-up policy.