To match an exact phrase, use quotation marks around the search term. eg. "Parliamentary Estate". Use "OR" or "AND" as link words to form more complex queries.


Keep yourself up-to-date with the latest developments by exploring our subscription options to receive notifications direct to your inbox

Speech in Commons Chamber - Fri 25 Nov 2022
Hunting Trophies (Import Prohibition) Bill

"I welcome the Bill and thank my hon. Friend the Member for Crawley (Henry Smith) for bringing this important piece of legislation forward. I welcome the tabling of the Bill as it allows this place to debate the often difficult reality surrounding conservation.

I personally find hunting distasteful. I am …..."

Nickie Aiken - View Speech

View all Nickie Aiken (Con - Cities of London and Westminster) contributions to the debate on: Hunting Trophies (Import Prohibition) Bill

Speech in Commons Chamber - Fri 25 Nov 2022
Hunting Trophies (Import Prohibition) Bill

"My right hon. Friend makes a salient point. Shooting magnificent animals such as rhinos, elephants and lions, and calling it “sport”, is abhorrent.

Naturally, I welcome the Bill and see it as an opportunity to bring about healthy debate on how we can best conserve endangered species while supporting the …..."

Nickie Aiken - View Speech

View all Nickie Aiken (Con - Cities of London and Westminster) contributions to the debate on: Hunting Trophies (Import Prohibition) Bill

Speech in Commons Chamber - Fri 25 Nov 2022
Hunting Trophies (Import Prohibition) Bill

"As ever, my right hon. Friend makes good points, which I will absolutely take on board...."
Nickie Aiken - View Speech

View all Nickie Aiken (Con - Cities of London and Westminster) contributions to the debate on: Hunting Trophies (Import Prohibition) Bill

Speech in Commons Chamber - Fri 25 Nov 2022
Hunting Trophies (Import Prohibition) Bill

"I will...."
Nickie Aiken - View Speech

View all Nickie Aiken (Con - Cities of London and Westminster) contributions to the debate on: Hunting Trophies (Import Prohibition) Bill

Speech in Commons Chamber - Fri 25 Nov 2022
Hunting Trophies (Import Prohibition) Bill

"The point I am trying to make is that I abhor hunting for trophies. I see no reason why anyone would want to bring trophies back to this country. In this debate, we have to talk about conservation and what will play well with local communities that rely on trophy …..."
Nickie Aiken - View Speech

View all Nickie Aiken (Con - Cities of London and Westminster) contributions to the debate on: Hunting Trophies (Import Prohibition) Bill

Speech in Commons Chamber - Fri 25 Nov 2022
Hunting Trophies (Import Prohibition) Bill

"My hon. Friend is absolutely right. The case I am trying to make is that we must persuade people that trophy hunting is not a sport. At the same time, we must remember that local communities rely on this business—I use that term very lightly. Through smart conservation, we have …..."
Nickie Aiken - View Speech

View all Nickie Aiken (Con - Cities of London and Westminster) contributions to the debate on: Hunting Trophies (Import Prohibition) Bill

Speech in Public Bill Committees - Thu 10 Feb 2022
Animal Welfare (Sentience) Bill [ Lords ]

"I welcome the Bill and am very proud to be sitting on this Public Bill Committee. The Bill is proportionate, timely and targeted. It is important, because the public believe passionately in animal welfare. Does my hon. Friend the Minister agree that their justified outpouring of revulsion at the recent …..."
Nickie Aiken - View Speech

View all Nickie Aiken (Con - Cities of London and Westminster) contributions to the debate on: Animal Welfare (Sentience) Bill [ Lords ]

Speech in Public Bill Committees - Thu 10 Feb 2022
Animal Welfare (Sentience) Bill [ Lords ]

"May I share your sentiments, Sir Charles, and say thank you to our parliamentary staff here and across the estate?..."
Nickie Aiken - View Speech

View all Nickie Aiken (Con - Cities of London and Westminster) contributions to the debate on: Animal Welfare (Sentience) Bill [ Lords ]

Written Question
Neonicotinoids
Monday 31st January 2022

Asked by: Nickie Aiken (Conservative - Cities of London and Westminster)

Question to the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs:

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, what assessment his Department has made of the potential merits of supporting further investment in the development of sustainable alternatives to neonicotinoids, in order to avoid their use in emergency authorisations in circumstances where diseases or pests cannot be controlled by other reasonable means.

Answered by Baroness Prentis of Banbury

Three neonicotinoids including the one covered by the sugar beet emergency authorisation, were banned by the EU in 2018, a decision the Government supported and so we have already moved decisively away from their use. British sugar is already developing alternative approaches to neonicotinoid seed treatments. It has stated that it may make applications for emergency authorisations for neonicotinoid seed treatments until 2023, by which time it intends to have developed alternative approaches. This includes the development of resistant plant varieties, measures to improve seed germination and new practices for growers.

Defra investment is not focused on the development of sustainable alternatives to specific pesticides such as neonicotinoids. The department has funded important research into other areas that will ensure pesticides can be used sustainably in the future.

We have funded research into the exposure of honeybees to pesticides, both over time and at national scale, through chemical analysis of pesticide residues found in honey samples. Using genetic techniques, such as DNA metabarcoding, this research can assess the plants foraged by exposed bees and highlight common pesticide exposure routes for this key pollinator species. We expect the results of this work to be published in the coming months.

We are also funding research exploring how we could further develop our monitoring to better understand the effects, and the impacts, of pesticides on pollinators, such as expanding residue assessments to include wild pollinator species of bumblebees and solitary bees.

Finally, in 2019 Defra commissioned the report 'Review of Evidence on Integrated Pest Management', which was published in 2020. This report assessed several themes including the effectiveness of IPM measures for reducing pesticide use, what combinations of IPM measures are most beneficial, and barriers and enablers to the uptake of IPM approaches. Research such as this will help Defra to meet its commitment to increase the uptake of Integrated Pest Management and sustainable crop protection, and therefore reduce any future reliance of emergency authorisation applications for neonicotinoids.


Written Question
Floods: Victoria Tower Gardens
Friday 12th March 2021

Asked by: Nickie Aiken (Conservative - Cities of London and Westminster)

Question to the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs:

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, what long term estimates his Department has made of the level of risk of flooding in the proposed Holocaust Memorial and Learning Centre site in Victoria Tower Gardens from a potential (a) breach of river wall or (b) overtopping of the river wall if water levels were to rise as a result of global warming.

Answered by Rebecca Pow

a) The Flood Risk Assessment required under paragraph 163 of the National Planning Framework, together with other associated assessments submitted by the applicant, has satisfactorily demonstrated that the integrity of the flood defence can be maintained throughout construction. This is subject to the actions of a detailed monitoring plan outlined within the application.

b) The applicant has demonstrated, through design and loading calculations, that the proposal will not preclude the requirement to raise the flood defences in the future as required by the Thames Estuary 2100 Plan.

It should be noted that while it may be impacted by this proposal, the flood defence is outside of the application boundary and will require cooperation between the applicant and the riparian owner to ensure that a continuous defence is maintained at all times.