Debates between Peter Bone and Gary Streeter during the 2015-2017 Parliament

Oral Answers to Questions

Debate between Peter Bone and Gary Streeter
Thursday 10th September 2015

(8 years, 8 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Peter Bone Portrait Mr Peter Bone (Wellingborough) (Con)
- Hansard - -

2. What assessment he has made of the effect of the proposed reduction in the number of Members of Parliament on the scrutiny of Government.

Gary Streeter Portrait Mr Gary Streeter (South West Devon)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

The next review of UK parliamentary constituencies—a subject of interest to one or two Members—will be based on a reduction in the number of Members of Parliament from 650 to 600, and it will be undertaken by the UK’s various boundary commissions, and not the Electoral Commission. As such, neither the Speaker’s Committee nor the Electoral Commission has made any assessment of its potential impact.

Peter Bone Portrait Mr Bone
- Hansard - -

Of course, one of the advantages of reducing the number of MPs is that fewer Whips will be required, but the first job of a Member of Parliament, who is not part of the Government, is to scrutinise the Government. By taking 50 out of these Members, the Government will not be scrutinised so well. Does my hon. Friend have a view on whether the size of the Government should be reduced proportionately to the reduction in the number of MPs?

Gary Streeter Portrait Mr Streeter
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

My hon. Friend speaks powerfully and with a modicum of common sense, as always. He may well have half a point, but this is not a matter for the Electoral Commission and it is not a matter for me.

Oral Answers to Questions

Debate between Peter Bone and Gary Streeter
Thursday 18th June 2015

(8 years, 11 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Gary Streeter Portrait Mr Streeter
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I certainly agree with my hon. Friend, and that is what many of our constituents want. The issue is: who is best placed to provide that impartial guide? Given the complexity of the question—there are so many unknowns—and the importance of ensuring that the Electoral Commission does not in any way undermine its neutrality and independence, it may not be the right organisation to carry out that task.

Peter Bone Portrait Mr Peter Bone (Wellingborough) (Con)
- Hansard - -

If they are not the people to do it, I am quite happy to take on that task. It would be pointless having such a document because it will have pages and pages and pages of costs; I doubt that we would find a page on the benefits.

Gary Streeter Portrait Mr Streeter
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I will certainly put that offer back to the Electoral Commission. I am sure that it will be as enthusiastic as I am.