To match an exact phrase, use quotation marks around the search term. eg. "Parliamentary Estate". Use "OR" or "AND" as link words to form more complex queries.


Keep yourself up-to-date with the latest developments by exploring our subscription options to receive notifications direct to your inbox

Division Vote (Commons)
19 Mar 2024 - Trade (Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership) Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context
Robert Jenrick (Con) voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 298 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 224 Noes - 301
Written Question
Visas: National Security
Monday 18th March 2024

Asked by: Robert Jenrick (Conservative - Newark)

Question to the Home Office:

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, pursuant to the Answer of 6 February 2024 to Questions 16488 and 16489 on Visas: National Security, for what reason his Department does not publish this information.

Answered by Tom Pursglove - Minister of State (Minister for Legal Migration and Delivery)

Our caseworking systems do not include MI reporting that differentiates between the various non-conducive refusal types and so the information requested is not available in a reportable format.


Speech in Commons Chamber - Thu 14 Mar 2024
Extremism Definition and Community Engagement

Speech Link

View all Robert Jenrick (Con - Newark) contributions to the debate on: Extremism Definition and Community Engagement

Division Vote (Commons)
13 Mar 2024 - National Insurance Contributions (Reduction in Rates) (No.2) Bill - View Vote Context
Robert Jenrick (Con) voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 296 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 44 Noes - 300
Division Vote (Commons)
13 Mar 2024 - National Insurance Contributions (Reduction in Rates) (No. 2) Bill - View Vote Context
Robert Jenrick (Con) voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 290 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 293 Noes - 41
Division Vote (Commons)
13 Mar 2024 - Business without Debate - View Vote Context
Robert Jenrick (Con) voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 288 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 291 Noes - 147
Division Vote (Commons)
13 Mar 2024 - National Insurance Contributions (Reduction in Rates) (No. 2) Bill - View Vote Context
Robert Jenrick (Con) voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 288 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 169 Noes - 293
Division Vote (Commons)
12 Mar 2024 - Budget Resolutions - View Vote Context
Robert Jenrick (Con) voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 311 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 318 Noes - 43
Written Question
Visas: National Security
Wednesday 6th March 2024

Asked by: Robert Jenrick (Conservative - Newark)

Question to the Home Office:

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, pursuant to the Answer of 29 February 2024 to Question 15646 on Visas: National Security, for what reason he will not publish the data.

Answered by Tom Pursglove - Minister of State (Minister for Legal Migration and Delivery)

We do not routinely publish data on UK visa holders who have had visas revoked on the grounds of (a) national security and (b) being non-conducive to the public good.


Written Question
Visas: National Security
Wednesday 6th March 2024

Asked by: Robert Jenrick (Conservative - Newark)

Question to the Home Office:

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, whether any UK visa holders have had their visas revoked on the grounds of (a) national security and (b) being non-conducive to the public good since 6 December 2023.

Answered by Tom Pursglove - Minister of State (Minister for Legal Migration and Delivery)

We do not routinely publish data on UK visa holders who have had visas revoked on the grounds of (a) national security and (b) being non-conducive to the public good.