To match an exact phrase, use quotation marks around the search term. eg. "Parliamentary Estate". Use "OR" or "AND" as link words to form more complex queries.


Keep yourself up-to-date with the latest developments by exploring our subscription options to receive notifications direct to your inbox

Division Vote (Commons)
19 Oct 2026 - Northern Ireland Troubles Bill - View Vote Context
Rupa Huq (Lab) voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 318 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 108 Noes - 327
Division Vote (Commons)
19 Oct 2026 - Northern Ireland Troubles Bill - View Vote Context
Rupa Huq (Lab) voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 320 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 169 Noes - 327
Division Vote (Commons)
19 Oct 2026 - Northern Ireland Troubles Bill (Programme) (No.2) - View Vote Context
Rupa Huq (Lab) voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 283 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 286 Noes - 163
Division Vote (Commons)
19 Oct 2026 - Northern Ireland Troubles Bill - View Vote Context
Rupa Huq (Lab) voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 317 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 167 Noes - 327
Written Question
Immigration Controls
Monday 19th October 2026

Asked by: Rupa Huq (Labour - Ealing Central and Acton)

Question to the Home Office:

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, whether her Department will extend eGate access to holders of Indefinite Leave to Remain.

Answered by Jo White - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Home Office)

Some holders of Indefinite Leave to Remain are already eligible to use eGates where they meet the current requirements, including those relating to their biometric passport, age, digital immigration status and the nationality shown in their travel document, or where they qualify through the Registered Traveller Service.

The Government is exploring options to expand eGate eligibility to the majority of passenger arrivals in the UK. Any changes to eligibility will be announced once decisions have been made.


Written Question
Payments: Biometrics
Monday 19th October 2026

Asked by: Rupa Huq (Labour - Ealing Central and Acton)

Question to the HM Treasury:

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, whether, further to his Department's consultation on the Modernising Payment Services Regulation, his Department has assessed the specific risks associated with the use of facial recognition technology by banks and payment service providers.

Answered by Lucy Rigby - Economic Secretary (HM Treasury)

Technology has a central role in the financial services sector's future success. The UK is creating an environment where firms, including banks and payment service providers, can safely adopt new innovations, including facial recognition technology.

To support the delivery of the Government’s vision for a trusted, world leading payments ecosystem delivered on next generation technology, the Government has consulted on proposals to modernise payment services regulation. This sought views on how the current regulation for payment services and electronic money needs to be updated to account for new innovations in the payments landscape, whilst ensuring strong consumer protections. The Government is currently considering responses to this consultation.

As part of this consultation, the Government reaffirmed its commitment to reforming the payment’s authentication regulations relating to Strong Customer Authentication in the Payment Services Regulations 2017. This will enable the Financial Conduct Authority to replace the existing requirements and make more outcomes-based rules about payments authentication.


Division Vote (Commons)
15 Oct 2026 - Highways (Financing) Bill - View Vote Context
Rupa Huq (Lab) voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 228 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 76 Noes - 231
Division Vote (Commons)
14 Oct 2026 - Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) - View Vote Context
Rupa Huq (Lab) voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 310 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 329 Noes - 115
Division Vote (Commons)
14 Oct 2026 - Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) - View Vote Context
Rupa Huq (Lab) voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 312 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 328 Noes - 114
Division Vote (Commons)
14 Oct 2026 - MOD Bicester and Illegal Migrants - View Vote Context
Rupa Huq (Lab) voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 292 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 113 Noes - 309