Written Question
Monday 9th February 2026
Asked by:
Rushanara Ali (Labour - Bethnal Green and Stepney)
Question
to the Department for Work and Pensions:
To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, with reference to the Minister for Pensions' oral contribution during the Report Stage of the Pension Schemes Bill on 3 December 2025, Official Report, column 1043, whether the proposed statutory guidance on fiduciary duties and subsequent amendments to it will be subject to the negative or affirmative procedure for statutory instruments.
Answered by Torsten Bell
- Parliamentary Secretary (HM Treasury)
Government has set out its intention to develop statutory guidance for the trust-based private pensions sector. The proposed guidance intends to clarify how trustees can interpret and apply their existing duties, particularly when considering wider or longer-term factors in investment decision-making. Government is developing this guidance in partnership with the pensions sector and will consult on the draft guidance.
Further details including the legislation to underpin strategy guidance will be published in due course.
Written Question
Monday 9th February 2026
Asked by:
Rushanara Ali (Labour - Bethnal Green and Stepney)
Question
to the Department for Work and Pensions:
To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, in relation to the statutory guidance on fiduciary duties announced during Report stage of the Pension Schemes Bill on 3 December 2025, when he intends to table this amendment to the Bill; whether he will consult on the guidance; and when he plans for the guidance to take effect.
Answered by Torsten Bell
- Parliamentary Secretary (HM Treasury)
Government has set out its intention to develop statutory guidance for the trust-based private pensions sector. The proposed guidance intends to clarify how trustees can interpret and apply their existing duties, particularly when considering wider or longer-term factors in investment decision-making. Government is developing this guidance in partnership with the pensions sector and will consult on the draft guidance.
Further details including the legislation to underpin strategy guidance will be published in due course.
Division Vote (Commons)
4 Feb 2026 - Climate Change -
View Vote Context
Rushanara Ali (Lab) voted Aye
- in line with the party majority
and in line with the House
One of
316 Labour Aye votes vs
0 Labour No votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 392 Noes - 116
Division Vote (Commons)
3 Feb 2026 - Universal Credit (Removal of Two Child Limit) Bill -
View Vote Context
Rushanara Ali (Lab) voted Aye
- in line with the party majority
and in line with the House
One of
358 Labour Aye votes vs
0 Labour No votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 458 Noes - 104
Division Vote (Commons)
28 Jan 2026 - Youth Unemployment -
View Vote Context
Rushanara Ali (Lab) voted No
- in line with the party majority
and in line with the House
One of
280 Labour No votes vs
0 Labour Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 91 Noes - 287
Division Vote (Commons)
28 Jan 2026 - Deferred Division -
View Vote Context
Rushanara Ali (Lab) voted Aye
- in line with the party majority
and in line with the House
One of
287 Labour Aye votes vs
3 Labour No votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 294 Noes - 108
Division Vote (Commons)
28 Jan 2026 - British Indian Ocean Territory -
View Vote Context
Rushanara Ali (Lab) voted No
- in line with the party majority
and in line with the House
One of
277 Labour No votes vs
0 Labour Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 103 Noes - 284
Division Vote (Commons)
27 Jan 2026 - Medical Training (Prioritisation) Bill -
View Vote Context
Rushanara Ali (Lab) voted No
- in line with the party majority
and in line with the House
One of
301 Labour No votes vs
0 Labour Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 88 Noes - 310
Division Vote (Commons)
27 Jan 2026 - Medical Training (Prioritisation) Bill -
View Vote Context
Rushanara Ali (Lab) voted No
- in line with the party majority
and in line with the House
One of
298 Labour No votes vs
0 Labour Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 61 Noes - 311
Division Vote (Commons)
27 Jan 2026 - Medical Training (Prioritisation) Bill -
View Vote Context
Rushanara Ali (Lab) voted No
- in line with the party majority
and in line with the House
One of
301 Labour No votes vs
0 Labour Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 91 Noes - 378