To match an exact phrase, use quotation marks around the search term. eg. "Parliamentary Estate". Use "OR" or "AND" as link words to form more complex queries.


Keep yourself up-to-date with the latest developments by exploring our subscription options to receive notifications direct to your inbox

Written Question
Myanmar: Religious Freedom
Monday 19th January 2026

Asked by: Ruth Jones (Labour - Newport West and Islwyn)

Question to the Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office:

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Affairs, what steps she is taking in collaboration with her counterpart in Myanmar to support the ability of Christian communities to (a) observe religious holidays and (b) practice their faith in Myanmar.

Answered by Seema Malhotra - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office)

The UK continues to support Freedom of Religion and Belief in Myanmar, and we support the right of Christian communities and other faith groups in Myanmar to practice their religion without fear of violence or persecution.

In 2025, we co-sponsored a UN Human Rights Council resolution calling for the Myanmar military to fully respect and protect the human rights of all persons, including those belonging to ethnic and religious minorities, and we strongly condemn the Myanmar military's use of airstrikes on civilian infrastructure, including places of worship.


Written Question
Animal Experiments: Demonstrations
Monday 19th January 2026

Asked by: Ruth Jones (Labour - Newport West and Islwyn)

Question to the Home Office:

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, whether she intends to publish guidance for (a) the Police and (b) the public on protests outside life science facilities using animals in research.

Answered by Sarah Jones - Minister of State (Home Office)

The right to peaceful protest is a fundamental part of our democratic society. It is a long-standing tradition in this country that people are free to gather and to demonstrate their views, provided that they do so within the law.

There is no statutory requirement for the Home Office to produce guidance for this instrument. However, the Home Office will work with the National Police Chiefs Council and the College of Policing as the regulations are implemented to ensure forces understand their operational responsibilities.


Written Question
Animal Experiments
Monday 19th January 2026

Asked by: Ruth Jones (Labour - Newport West and Islwyn)

Question to the Home Office:

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, when she plans to publish the results of the consultation on potential reforms to Section 24 of Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act 1986, which closed on 13 June 2014.

Answered by Dan Jarvis - Minister of State (Cabinet Office)

In 2014, the then Government commenced a public consultation seeking views on section 24, with the aim of increasing openness and transparency. This work was paused due to changes in administration in 2015.

Under this Government, the Home Office has been reviewing the matter internally, and the intention to clarify the position on Section 24 of the Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act 1986 remains, taking account of the previous consultation.


Division Vote (Commons)
14 Jan 2026 - Public Order - View Vote Context
Ruth Jones (Lab) voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 26 Labour No votes vs 295 Labour Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 301 Noes - 110
Speech in Westminster Hall - Wed 14 Jan 2026
Ajax Programme

"It is a pleasure to serve under your chairmanship, Mr Stuart. I thank the hon. and gallant Member for Huntingdon (Ben Obese-Jecty) for securing this important debate.

I pay tribute to our armed forces and those who put their lives on the line to keep our country safe. We ask …..."

Ruth Jones - View Speech

View all Ruth Jones (Lab - Newport West and Islwyn) contributions to the debate on: Ajax Programme

Division Vote (Commons)
13 Jan 2026 - Finance (No. 2) Bill - View Vote Context
Ruth Jones (Lab) voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 323 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 348 Noes - 167
Division Vote (Commons)
13 Jan 2026 - Finance (No. 2) Bill - View Vote Context
Ruth Jones (Lab) voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 328 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 172 Noes - 334
Division Vote (Commons)
13 Jan 2026 - Finance (No. 2) Bill - View Vote Context
Ruth Jones (Lab) voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 325 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 181 Noes - 335
Division Vote (Commons)
13 Jan 2026 - Finance (No. 2) Bill - View Vote Context
Ruth Jones (Lab) voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 334 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 187 Noes - 351
Division Vote (Commons)
13 Jan 2026 - Finance (No. 2) Bill - View Vote Context
Ruth Jones (Lab) voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 321 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 184 Noes - 331