Draft Enactment of Extra-Statutory Concessions Order 2018 Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate
Department: HM Treasury
Mel Stride Portrait Mel Stride
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I thank the shadow Minister for his contribution, for his support for the order and for his two questions. He is quite right. We consulted fully on this measure between 14 September and 9 November last year.

Sarah Champion Portrait Sarah Champion (Rotherham) (Lab)
- Hansard - -

The consultation received only four responses. Is that normal? What were the processes for publicising the consultation?

Mel Stride Portrait Mel Stride
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

On those specific questions, which are very relevant and pertinent, I would be very happy to come back to the hon. Lady, if some information does not wing its way to me in the next moment or two. I intend to cogitate on the important point that she has raised.

In the meantime, I shall return to the shadow Minister’s two questions. I await some information on NICs and directors’ fees. [Interruption.] That information has arrived: there is no impact on NICs in respect of his question. He also raised the scope of the concessions, and the change from “small” to “insubstantial”. I am fairly confident that that rests in the guidance that HMRC operates on those matters, but I am happy to come back to him on that.

Having answered those two questions, I return to the question that the hon. Member for Rotherham asked. Is it normal to get just four responses? The answer is that that is not unusual, given that the consultation was a very technical one. On that basis, I hope that the Committee will agree to the order.

Question put and agreed to.