Information between 4th September 2026 - 24th September 2026
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
| Calendar |
|---|
|
Monday 12th October 2026 Sarah Champion (Labour - Rotherham) Select Committee Statement - Main Chamber Subject: Select Committee Statement on the Second Report of the International Development Committee, UK International Climate Finance: Sustaining Commitments and Impact Amid a Shrinking Aid Budget, HC 206 View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Friday 4th December 2026 Sarah Champion (Labour - Rotherham) Private Members' Bills - Main Chamber Subject: Public Procurement (British Goods and Services) Bill: Second Reading Public Procurement (British Goods and Services) Bill 2026-27 View calendar - Add to calendar |
| Division Votes |
|---|
|
8 Sep 2026 - Health Bill - View Vote Context Sarah Champion voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 289 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 162 Noes - 297 |
|
9 Sep 2026 - Plant Health - View Vote Context Sarah Champion voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 317 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 371 Noes - 100 |
|
7 Sep 2026 - Health Bill - View Vote Context Sarah Champion voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 311 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 170 Noes - 316 |
|
7 Sep 2026 - Health Bill - View Vote Context Sarah Champion voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 317 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 77 Noes - 317 |
|
8 Sep 2026 - Health Bill - View Vote Context Sarah Champion voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 293 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 106 Noes - 302 |
|
8 Sep 2026 - Health Bill - View Vote Context Sarah Champion voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 292 Labour No votes vs 3 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 108 Noes - 357 |
|
8 Sep 2026 - Health Bill - View Vote Context Sarah Champion voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 298 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 79 Noes - 300 |
|
11 Sep 2026 - Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill - View Vote Context Sarah Champion voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 190 Labour Aye votes vs 153 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 270 Noes - 286 |
|
11 Sep 2026 - Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill - View Vote Context Sarah Champion voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 209 Labour Aye votes vs 115 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 293 Noes - 218 |
| Speeches |
|---|
|
Sarah Champion speeches from: Speciality Steel UK
Sarah Champion contributed 1 speech (255 words) Monday 14th September 2026 - Commons Chamber Department for Business, Innovation, Science and Trade |
|
Sarah Champion speeches from: Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill
Sarah Champion contributed 3 speeches (698 words) 2nd reading Friday 11th September 2026 - Commons Chamber Ministry of Justice |
|
Sarah Champion speeches from: Israel and Palestine
Sarah Champion contributed 1 speech (143 words) Tuesday 8th September 2026 - Commons Chamber Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office |
| Written Answers |
|---|
|
Prisoners' Release
Asked by: Sarah Champion (Labour - Rotherham) Friday 4th September 2026 Question to the Ministry of Justice: To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, whether Victim Liaison Officers will make recommendations regarding victim safety prior to the early release of any prisoner convicted of (a) sexual offences, (b) child sexual offences and (c) domestic abuse-related offences under the Earned Progression Model; and whether those recommended safety measures will be fully implemented ahead of any such release. Answered by Catherine McKinnell - Minister of State (Ministry of Justice) Sections 35 to 45 of the Domestic Violence, Crime and Victims Act 2004 provide eligible victims with statutory rights under the Probation Service Victim Contact Scheme, including the opportunity to make representations about licence conditions and to receive relevant information about an offender's release. These arrangements apply equally to releases under the Earned Progression Model. This includes eligible sexual, child sexual and domestic abuse-related offences where the victim falls within the scope of the Victim Contact Scheme. In line with policy, there is engagement between the Probation Practitioner responsible for supervising the offender on licence and the Victim Liaison Officer, to ensure that victims' views on licence conditions are sought and considered prior to any release subject to licence. In cases involving eligible violent or sexual offences where an offender has received a custodial sentence of 12 months or more, Victim Liaison Officers engage with victims regarding proposed licence conditions and any conditions they wish to request. These may include measures such as exclusion zones and non-contact conditions. The role of the Victim Liaison Officer is to ensure that victims’ views and concerns are heard throughout the offender management process, including prior to release. Their role is to obtain and communicate victims’ views to the Probation Practitioner. Victims are then informed of the outcome of decisions relating to licence conditions, including any agreed exclusion zones. Arrangements are made before release to ensure that approved licence conditions take effect from the point of release including implementing electronic monitoring or GPS exclusion zones. Where victim representations are not reflected in the final licence conditions, the reasons for the decision will be communicated to the victim. There is no formal appeal process for victims in relation to licence conditions, although concerns may be raised through existing HMPPS complaints procedures. The Department keeps operational resource requirements under review and works closely with probation regions to ensure that statutory obligations to victims continue to be met, including those delivered through the Victim Contact Scheme. |
|
Prisoners' Release
Asked by: Sarah Champion (Labour - Rotherham) Friday 4th September 2026 Question to the Ministry of Justice: To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, whether there is a requirement to ensure that a Victim Liaison Officer is formally consulted regarding victim safety and geographic exclusion zones prior to the early release of any prisoner convicted of (a) sexual offences, (b) child sexual offences and (c) domestic abuse-related offences. Answered by Catherine McKinnell - Minister of State (Ministry of Justice) Sections 35 to 45 of the Domestic Violence, Crime and Victims Act 2004 provide eligible victims with statutory rights under the Probation Service Victim Contact Scheme, including the opportunity to make representations about licence conditions and to receive relevant information about an offender's release. These arrangements apply equally to releases under the Earned Progression Model. This includes eligible sexual, child sexual and domestic abuse-related offences where the victim falls within the scope of the Victim Contact Scheme. In line with policy, there is engagement between the Probation Practitioner responsible for supervising the offender on licence and the Victim Liaison Officer, to ensure that victims' views on licence conditions are sought and considered prior to any release subject to licence. In cases involving eligible violent or sexual offences where an offender has received a custodial sentence of 12 months or more, Victim Liaison Officers engage with victims regarding proposed licence conditions and any conditions they wish to request. These may include measures such as exclusion zones and non-contact conditions. The role of the Victim Liaison Officer is to ensure that victims’ views and concerns are heard throughout the offender management process, including prior to release. Their role is to obtain and communicate victims’ views to the Probation Practitioner. Victims are then informed of the outcome of decisions relating to licence conditions, including any agreed exclusion zones. Arrangements are made before release to ensure that approved licence conditions take effect from the point of release including implementing electronic monitoring or GPS exclusion zones. Where victim representations are not reflected in the final licence conditions, the reasons for the decision will be communicated to the victim. There is no formal appeal process for victims in relation to licence conditions, although concerns may be raised through existing HMPPS complaints procedures. The Department keeps operational resource requirements under review and works closely with probation regions to ensure that statutory obligations to victims continue to be met, including those delivered through the Victim Contact Scheme. |
|
Prisoners' Release
Asked by: Sarah Champion (Labour - Rotherham) Friday 4th September 2026 Question to the Ministry of Justice: To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what policy protocol is in place under the Earned Progression Model when a releasing authority declines to implement a safety or geographic exclusion zone recommendation made by a Victim Liaison Officer; and what the formal appeal or review mechanism is for a victim if such a recommendation is rejected. Answered by Catherine McKinnell - Minister of State (Ministry of Justice) Sections 35 to 45 of the Domestic Violence, Crime and Victims Act 2004 provide eligible victims with statutory rights under the Probation Service Victim Contact Scheme, including the opportunity to make representations about licence conditions and to receive relevant information about an offender's release. These arrangements apply equally to releases under the Earned Progression Model. This includes eligible sexual, child sexual and domestic abuse-related offences where the victim falls within the scope of the Victim Contact Scheme. In line with policy, there is engagement between the Probation Practitioner responsible for supervising the offender on licence and the Victim Liaison Officer, to ensure that victims' views on licence conditions are sought and considered prior to any release subject to licence. In cases involving eligible violent or sexual offences where an offender has received a custodial sentence of 12 months or more, Victim Liaison Officers engage with victims regarding proposed licence conditions and any conditions they wish to request. These may include measures such as exclusion zones and non-contact conditions. The role of the Victim Liaison Officer is to ensure that victims’ views and concerns are heard throughout the offender management process, including prior to release. Their role is to obtain and communicate victims’ views to the Probation Practitioner. Victims are then informed of the outcome of decisions relating to licence conditions, including any agreed exclusion zones. Arrangements are made before release to ensure that approved licence conditions take effect from the point of release including implementing electronic monitoring or GPS exclusion zones. Where victim representations are not reflected in the final licence conditions, the reasons for the decision will be communicated to the victim. There is no formal appeal process for victims in relation to licence conditions, although concerns may be raised through existing HMPPS complaints procedures. The Department keeps operational resource requirements under review and works closely with probation regions to ensure that statutory obligations to victims continue to be met, including those delivered through the Victim Contact Scheme. |
|
Prisoners' Release
Asked by: Sarah Champion (Labour - Rotherham) Friday 4th September 2026 Question to the Ministry of Justice: To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what steps his Department takes to verify that all protective licence conditions and GPS exclusion zones recommended by a Victim Liaison Officer are (a) fully active and (b) communicated to the victim before an offender is released under the intensive supervision stage of the Earned Progression Model. Answered by Catherine McKinnell - Minister of State (Ministry of Justice) Sections 35 to 45 of the Domestic Violence, Crime and Victims Act 2004 provide eligible victims with statutory rights under the Probation Service Victim Contact Scheme, including the opportunity to make representations about licence conditions and to receive relevant information about an offender's release. These arrangements apply equally to releases under the Earned Progression Model. This includes eligible sexual, child sexual and domestic abuse-related offences where the victim falls within the scope of the Victim Contact Scheme. In line with policy, there is engagement between the Probation Practitioner responsible for supervising the offender on licence and the Victim Liaison Officer, to ensure that victims' views on licence conditions are sought and considered prior to any release subject to licence. In cases involving eligible violent or sexual offences where an offender has received a custodial sentence of 12 months or more, Victim Liaison Officers engage with victims regarding proposed licence conditions and any conditions they wish to request. These may include measures such as exclusion zones and non-contact conditions. The role of the Victim Liaison Officer is to ensure that victims’ views and concerns are heard throughout the offender management process, including prior to release. Their role is to obtain and communicate victims’ views to the Probation Practitioner. Victims are then informed of the outcome of decisions relating to licence conditions, including any agreed exclusion zones. Arrangements are made before release to ensure that approved licence conditions take effect from the point of release including implementing electronic monitoring or GPS exclusion zones. Where victim representations are not reflected in the final licence conditions, the reasons for the decision will be communicated to the victim. There is no formal appeal process for victims in relation to licence conditions, although concerns may be raised through existing HMPPS complaints procedures. The Department keeps operational resource requirements under review and works closely with probation regions to ensure that statutory obligations to victims continue to be met, including those delivered through the Victim Contact Scheme. |
|
Prisoners' Release
Asked by: Sarah Champion (Labour - Rotherham) Friday 4th September 2026 Question to the Ministry of Justice: To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what assessment his Department has made of the adequacy of the administrative and casework capacity of Victim Liaison Officers to manage the increased volume of statutory consultations required under the early release provisions of the Earned Progression Model. Answered by Catherine McKinnell - Minister of State (Ministry of Justice) Sections 35 to 45 of the Domestic Violence, Crime and Victims Act 2004 provide eligible victims with statutory rights under the Probation Service Victim Contact Scheme, including the opportunity to make representations about licence conditions and to receive relevant information about an offender's release. These arrangements apply equally to releases under the Earned Progression Model. This includes eligible sexual, child sexual and domestic abuse-related offences where the victim falls within the scope of the Victim Contact Scheme. In line with policy, there is engagement between the Probation Practitioner responsible for supervising the offender on licence and the Victim Liaison Officer, to ensure that victims' views on licence conditions are sought and considered prior to any release subject to licence. In cases involving eligible violent or sexual offences where an offender has received a custodial sentence of 12 months or more, Victim Liaison Officers engage with victims regarding proposed licence conditions and any conditions they wish to request. These may include measures such as exclusion zones and non-contact conditions. The role of the Victim Liaison Officer is to ensure that victims’ views and concerns are heard throughout the offender management process, including prior to release. Their role is to obtain and communicate victims’ views to the Probation Practitioner. Victims are then informed of the outcome of decisions relating to licence conditions, including any agreed exclusion zones. Arrangements are made before release to ensure that approved licence conditions take effect from the point of release including implementing electronic monitoring or GPS exclusion zones. Where victim representations are not reflected in the final licence conditions, the reasons for the decision will be communicated to the victim. There is no formal appeal process for victims in relation to licence conditions, although concerns may be raised through existing HMPPS complaints procedures. The Department keeps operational resource requirements under review and works closely with probation regions to ensure that statutory obligations to victims continue to be met, including those delivered through the Victim Contact Scheme. |
|
Origin Marking: Occupied Territories
Asked by: Sarah Champion (Labour - Rotherham) Tuesday 8th September 2026 Question to the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs: To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, when her Department last reviewed the 2009 technical advice document on the labelling of produce originating from the Occupied Palestinian Territories; and whether she plans to update the guidance. Answered by Stephen Morgan - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs) The UK aims to maintain high standards on the information provided on food labels so that consumers can have confidence in the food that they buy. The UK expects food originating from Israeli settlements located in the territories occupied by Israel since 1967 to be accurately labelled to prevent consumers being misled. All food sold on the UK market, including imported food, must comply with food labelling rules.
Defra continues to consider food labelling issues of importance to consumers and businesses, including the provision of guidance, and will provide further updates as this work progresses. |
|
Drugs: Research
Asked by: Sarah Champion (Labour - Rotherham) Tuesday 8th September 2026 Question to the Department for Business, Innovation, Science and Trade: To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Innovation, Science and Trade, with reference to the press release entitled Patients to benefit from faster access to medicines as UK moves away from animal testing in science, published on 12 August 2026, if he will provide a breakdown of that funding, including the (a) name of each project, (b) recipient organisation and (c) amount awarded to each project. Answered by Chris McDonald - Minister of State (Department of Health and Social Care) Innovate UK awarded funding to the following projects: VivoSphere CardioSafe Platform for Reproducible, Regulatory-Ready In Vitro Cardiotoxicity Screening (VivoSphere UK, ÂŁ200,000); RITMO (BiomimX Srl, ÂŁ199,991); a cardiovascular safety framework (University of Nottingham, ÂŁ198,464); Integrated MPS-PBPK Platform for Non Animal Human PK Prediction (CN Bio Innovations, ÂŁ180,980); chemically expanded hepatocytes for pharmacokinetic studies (University of Edinburgh, ÂŁ194,563); Human Representative In Vitro Models for Ear Therapeutics (CamGene Therapeutics, ÂŁ196,194); CANVAS (Biofoundry Energy, ÂŁ197,092); a cardiovascular safety platform (InoCardia, ÂŁ188,966); computational prediction of lipid nanoparticle pharmacokinetics (Nanograb, ÂŁ199,390); and PKBridge (IOTeach, ÂŁ197,500). |
|
Imports: Israel
Asked by: Sarah Champion (Labour - Rotherham) Tuesday 15th September 2026 Question to the Department for Business, Innovation, Science and Trade: To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Innovation, Science and Trade, when HM Revenue and Customs last updated the non-eligible postcode list published under the Notice to Importers: imports from Israel into the United Kingdom; and whether that data is shared with the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, Department for Business, Innovation, Science and Trade and Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government to support labelling enforcement. Answered by Blair McDougall - Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State (Department for Business, Innovation, Science and Trade) (Jointly with the Department for Energy Security and Net Zero) The non-eligible postcode list was last updated on 22 August 2025 and HMRC work in cooperation with the relevant government departments on enforcement. However, as of 8 September the Foreign Secretary has announced an import ban on goods from Israeli Settlements. This ban will subsume our existing measures and by design is aimed at being disruptive to the economic drivers that help illegal settlements grow. Detailed guidance for businesses on the implications of this will be published alongside the legislation, and we will work closely with colleagues across government on the design and enforcement of these new measures. |
|
Furs: Farms
Asked by: Sarah Champion (Labour - Rotherham) Friday 11th September 2026 Question to the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs: To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, whether the fur working group established by her Department will consider the potential public health risks associated with overseas fur farming; and when she plans to publish her Department's policy position on the UK fur trade. Answered by Stephen Morgan - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs) As set out in the Animal Welfare Strategy, Defra has established a working group on fur, involving both industry experts and those who support restrictions on the trade in fur. The primary focus of the group will be to explore animal welfare concerns relating to the fur trade and the different ways in which they could be addressed. The department will seek appropriate input from relevant experts as needed as part of this.
Along with the previous government’s call for evidence and the Animal Welfare Committee’s opinion on fur, outputs from this working group will be used to inform future policy decisions on this issue. |
|
Retail Trade: Origin Marking
Asked by: Sarah Champion (Labour - Rotherham) Friday 11th September 2026 Question to the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government: To ask the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, what discussions her Department has had with local authority Trading Standards services regarding the resourcing and enforcement of retail country-of-origin labelling compliance. Answered by Jim McMahon - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Housing, Communities and Local Government) Under consumer protection legislation enforced locally by Trading Standards, it is illegal to mislead consumers as to the nature of a product through labelling or other marketing.
With respect to food labelling, the Department for the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs and the Food Standards Agency work closely with Local Authority Enforcement Officers who enforce food labelling rules in the UK, including country-of-origin labelling requirements.
Resourcing of Trading Standards is a matter for the relevant local authority. The final 2026-27 Local Government Finance Settlement makes available ÂŁ78 billion in Core Spending Power for local authorities in England in 2026-27, a 6.1% increase compared to 2025-26.
The majority of funding in the Local Government Finance Settlement is unringfenced recognising that local leaders are best placed to identify local priorities. |
|
Air Passenger Duty
Asked by: Sarah Champion (Labour - Rotherham) Wednesday 9th September 2026 Question to the HM Treasury: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, whether the Treasury has made an assessment of (a) the potential revenue that could be raised from extending the higher rate of Air Passenger Duty to all private jet flights and (b) the impact of using any additional revenue raised to support households facing higher living costs. Answered by James Murray - Financial Secretary to the Treasury and Paymaster General At present, only 36 per cent of private jet passengers pay the higher APD rate, while most pay the same as those on commercial flights, despite private jets offering a more premium service with far fewer passengers and significantly higher emissions per person than commercial flights. The Government does not believe this to be fair, which is why at Budget 2024 we announced that from April 2027, the Government will extend the scope of the higher rate of APD to cover all private jets over 5.7 tonnes. This change will mean that private jet passengers always pay higher rates of APD compared to commercial flyers and ensures fair and consistent taxation across private aviation. The measure is expected to raise ÂŁ10m per year. These figures have been certified by the Office for Budget Responsibility and were published alongside Budget 2025. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/air-passenger-duty-and-private-jets/air-passenger-duty-extension-of-the-higher-rate |
|
Solar Power: Social Rented Housing
Asked by: Sarah Champion (Labour - Rotherham) Wednesday 9th September 2026 Question to the Department for Energy Security & Net Zero: To ask the Secretary of State for Energy Security and Net Zero, what guidance her Department provides to social housing providers on the (a) disposal, (b) replacement and (c) recycling of legacy solar photovoltaic panels that have reached the end of their operational lifecycle. Answered by Polly Billington - Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State (Department for Energy Security and Net Zero) Legislation is in place to control the disposal of solar equipment at the end of its life for the collection and recycling of old PV panels with some companies globally and in the UK able to take the materials from the panels to use in different industries.
Whilst no formal guidance is provided to social housing providers, they should ensure they have familiarised themselves with the disposal obligations under UK regulations before installing solar panel on homes. If they are unsure of how to comply with these regulations they can speak with the supplier and installer of the panels, or with specialist panel recycling companies. |
|
Children: Social Media
Asked by: Sarah Champion (Labour - Rotherham) Wednesday 9th September 2026 Question To ask the Secretary of State for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport, what steps her Department plans to take to ensure that the scope of the proposed ban on social media companies for children under 16 can respond to changes in (a) the services used by children, (b) the risks posed by those services and (c) the safety measures implemented by service providers. Answered by Ian Murray - Minister of State (Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport) The government announced in June that we would ban social media companies from offering their services to under 16s. This means capturing user to user platforms, whose purpose is to enable social interaction, and which allow users to post material alongside algorithms. The department is currently working through the details and the final scope criteria will be set out in the regulations that will be laid in Parliament. |
|
China: Uyghurs
Asked by: Sarah Champion (Labour - Rotherham) Tuesday 22nd September 2026 Question to the Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office: To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Affairs, what assessment his department has made of the UK’s obligations under (a) pillar two and (b) pillar three of the UN Responsibility to Protect framework in relation to the treatment of Uyghurs in Xinjiang. Answered by Chris Elmore - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office) The UK continues to stand firm on human rights in China, including in Xinjiang, where Uyghurs and other predominantly Muslim communities continue to face persecution and arbitrary detention. We raise our concerns directly at the highest levels, and in international fora such as at the UN Human Rights Council. In a statement on 8 September, the UK's Human Rights Ambassador noted that "China has yet to implement the recommendations of the Office of the High Commissioner's Xinjiang Assessment" and that "evidence of violations in Xinjiang and Tibet persists". |
| Live Transcript |
|---|
|
Note: Cited speaker in live transcript data may not always be accurate. Check video link to confirm. |
|
4 Sep 2026, 1:45 p.m. - House of Lords "and my noble friend Baroness Young of Hornsey, and also Sarah Champion, " Lord Alton of Liverpool (Crossbench) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
7 Sep 2026, 5:50 p.m. - National Security Strategy (Joint Committee) "Sorry, Sarah Champion, please. " Sarah Champion - View Video - View Transcript |
|
8 Sep 2026, 2:08 p.m. - House of Commons ">> I appreciate how important this debate is, but questions must be short and Foreign Secretary if we can be short to Sarah Champion. " Rt Hon Ed Miliband MP, Foreign Secretary, Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office (Doncaster North, Labour) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
8 Sep 2026, 2:08 p.m. - House of Commons "can be short to Sarah Champion. >> Thank you, Mr. Foreign Secretary. >> I welcome the entirety. >> Of this. " Rt Hon Ed Miliband MP, Foreign Secretary, Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office (Doncaster North, Labour) - View Video - View Transcript |
| Parliamentary Debates |
|---|
|
Speciality Steel UK
9 speeches (3,739 words) Tuesday 15th September 2026 - Lords Chamber Department for Business, Innovation, Science and Trade Mentions: 1: None for Rawmarsh and Conisbrough, John Healey, and my honourable friends the Members for Rotherham, Sarah Champion - Link to Speech |
|
Speciality Steel UK
41 speeches (7,917 words) Monday 14th September 2026 - Commons Chamber Department for Business, Innovation, Science and Trade Mentions: 1: Jonathan Reynolds (LAB - Stalybridge and Hyde) Friends the Members for Rotherham (Sarah Champion), for Penistone and Stocksbridge (Dr Tidball), and - Link to Speech 2: Jessica Morden (Lab - Newport East) Friend the Member for Rotherham (Sarah Champion) said, is in direct contrast to the Conservatives, who - Link to Speech |
|
Bills Presented
0 speeches (None words) Monday 14th September 2026 - Commons Chamber Mentions: 1: None supported by Ian Roome, Mike Reader, Mr Jonathan Brash, Tom Gordon, Martin Wrigley, Clive Jones, Sarah Champion - Link to Speech |
|
Oral Answers to Questions
123 speeches (10,497 words) Wednesday 9th September 2026 - Commons Chamber Cabinet Office Mentions: 1: Alex Davies-Jones (Lab - Pontypridd) Friend—my good friend—the Member for Rotherham (Sarah Champion). I will happily meet with the hon. - Link to Speech |
|
Forced Labour in UK Supply Chains (JCHR Report)
37 speeches (13,099 words) Friday 4th September 2026 - Lords Chamber Home Office Mentions: 1: Lord Alton of Liverpool (XB - Life peer) of the calibre of the noble Baroness, Lady O’Grady, my noble friend Lady Young of Hornsey and Sarah Champion - Link to Speech |
| Calendar |
|---|
|
Monday 12th October 2026 4 p.m. National Security Strategy (Joint Committee) - Private Meeting View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Tuesday 15th September 2026 1:30 p.m. International Development Committee - Oral evidence Subject: The work of the Minister for International Development At 2:00pm: Oral evidence Kirsty McNeill MP - Minister of State for International Development and Africa at Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office Nick Dyer - Interim Permanent Under-Secretary at Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Tuesday 13th October 2026 1:30 p.m. International Development Committee - Oral evidence Subject: FCDO's approach to higher education and research partnerships At 2:00pm: Oral evidence Professor Adrian Martin - Professor of Environment and Development, School of Global Development at University of East Anglia Professor Liz Baggs - Vice-Principal Research and Innovation; and Commissioner at the Commonwealth Scholarship Commission at The University of Edinburgh Mr Jonathan Leape - Executive Director, International Growth Centre at London School of Economics At 3:00pm: Oral evidence Mr Harry Anderson - Deputy Director for Policy and Global Engagement at Universities UK International Anuradha Joshi - Director at Institute of Development Studies View calendar - Add to calendar |
| Scottish Calendar |
|---|
|
Thursday 10th September 2026 9:10 a.m. 2nd Meeting, 2026 (Session 7) The committee will meet at 9:10am at Committee Room 3 and will be broadcast on www.scottishparliament.tv. 1. Declaration of interests: Steven Bonnar MSP will be invited to declare any relevant interests. 2. Decision on taking business in private: The Committee will decide whether to take item 5 in private. 3. Cross-Party Group: The Committee will consider an application for recognition from the proposed Cross-Party Group on Science and Technology, and take evidence from—Clare Adamson MSP, Proposed Convener of the CPG on Science and Technology. 4. Cross-Party Group - approval: The Committee will decide whether to accord recognition to the proposed Cross-Party Group on Science and Technology. 5. Work programme: The Committee will review its work programme. For further information, contact the Clerk to the Committee via email at [email protected] View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Thursday 10th September 2026 9:15 a.m. 2nd Meeting, 2026 (Session 7) The committee will meet at 9:15am at Committee Room 3 and will be broadcast on www.scottishparliament.tv. 1. Decision on taking business in private: The Committee will decide whether to take item 4 in private. 2. Cross-Party Group: The Committee will consider an application for recognition from the proposed Cross-Party Group on Science and Technology, and take evidence from—Clare Adamson MSP, Proposed Convener of the CPG on Science and Technology. 3. Cross-Party Group - approval: The Committee will decide whether to accord recognition to the proposed Cross-Party Group on Science and Technology. 4. Work programme: The Committee will review its work programme. For further information, contact the Clerk to the Committee via email at [email protected] View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Thursday 24th September 2026 9 a.m. 3rd Meeting, 2026 (Session 7) The committee will meet at 9:00am at Committee Room 3 and will be broadcast on www.scottishparliament.tv. 1. Decisions on taking business in private: The Committee will decide whether to take items 2, 3 and 4 in private. 2. Commissioner for Ethical Standards in Public Life in Scotland: The Committee will consider a report from the Commissioner for Ethical Standards in Public Life in Scotland. 3. Commissioner for Ethical Standards in Public Life in Scotland: The Committee will consider a request for a direction from the Commissioner for Ethical Standards in Public Life in Scotland. 4. Work programme: The Committee will consider its work programme. For further information, contact the Clerk to the Committee via email at [email protected] View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Thursday 1st October 2026 9:15 a.m. 4th Meeting, 2026 (Session 7) The committee will meet at 9:15am at Committee Room 3 and will be broadcast on www.scottishparliament.tv. 1. Decision on taking business in private: The Committee will decide whether to take item 7 in private. 2. Subordinate Legislation: The Committee will take evidence on — The Representation of the People (Postal Voting for Local Government Elections) (Scotland) Amendment Regulations 2026 [draft]The Scottish Local Government Elections (Election Agents, Expenses and Publication of Information) Amendment Order 2026 [draft] from— Jamie Hepburn, Minister for Parliamentary Business and Veterans and Iain Hockenhull, Head of Elections, Scottish Government. Lorraine Walkinshaw, Lawyer, Scottish Government Legal Directorate. 3. Subordinate Legislation: Jamie Hepburn, Minister for Parliamentary Business and Veterans to move— S7M-01085—That the Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee recommends that the The Representation of the People (Postal Voting for Local Government Elections) (Scotland) Amendment Regulations 2026 [draft] be approved.S7M-01086—That the Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee recommends that the The Scottish Local Government Elections (Election Agents, Expenses and Publication of Information) Amendment Order 2026 [draft] be approved. 4. Subordinate Legislation: The Committee will consider— The Representation of the People (Absent Voting at Local Government Elections) (Scotland) Amendment Regulations 2026 (SSI 2026/251)The Scottish Local Government Elections Amendment Order 2026 (SSI 2026/254) 5. Scottish Local Government Elections (Candidacy Rights of Commonwealth Citizens) Bill – Stage 1 evidence: The Committee will take evidence from— Robert Nicol, President, Scottish Assessors Association. Chris Highcock, Secretary to the Board and Depute Returning Officer for the City of Edinburgh, Electoral Management Board for Scotland. 6. Representation of the People Bill (UK Parliament Legislation) – evidence: The Committee will take evidence on legislative consent memorandums LCM-S6-74, LCM-S7-7, LCM-S7-7a and LCM-S7-7b from— Robert Nicol, Electoral Registration Officer and Chris Highcock, Secretary to the Board and Depute Returning Officer for the City of Edinburgh, Electoral Management Board for Scotland. Professor Toby James, Professor of Politics and Public Policy, University of East Anglia UK. 7. Review of evidence: The Committee will review the evidence it heard under agenda items 5 and 6. For further information, contact the Clerk to the Committee on [email protected] View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Thursday 8th October 2026 9:15 a.m. 5th Meeting, 2026 (Session 7) The committee will meet at 9:15am at Committee Room 3 and will be broadcast on www.scottishparliament.tv. 1. Decisions on taking business in private: The Committee will decide whether to take items 6, 7 and 8 in private. 2. Cross-Party Group: The Committee will consider an application for recognition from the proposed Cross-Party Group on Ireland, and take evidence from— Patricia Gibson, Proposed Convener of Cross-Party Group on Ireland, Scottish Parliament. 3. Cross-Party Group - approval: The Committee will decide whether to accord recognition to the proposed Cross-Party Group on Ireland. 4. Scottish Local Government Elections (Candidacy Rights of Commonwealth Citizens) Bill – Stage 1 evidence: The Committee will take evidence from— Professor Toby James, Professor of Politics and Public Policy, University of East Anglia UK; Professor Alistair Clark, Professor of Political Science, Newcastle University; Andy Hunter, Chair of the Scotland and Northern Ireland Branch, Association of Electoral Administrators; and then from— Jamie Hepburn, Minister for Parliamentary Business and Veterans, Iain Hockenhull, Head of Elections, and Angus Reid-Bryan, Elections Team, Scottish Government. Lorraine Walkinshaw, Lawyer, Scottish Government Legal Directorate. 5. Subordinate legislation: The Committee will consider the Representation of the People (Absent Voting at Local Government Elections) (Scotland) Amendment (No. 2) Regulations 2026 [SSI 2026/263] 6. Review of evidence: The Committee will consider the evidence it heard under agenda item 4. 7. Temporary Standing Order Rule Changes: The Committee will consider its approach to scrutiny of the Presiding Officer's temporary changes to Standing Orders. 8. Complaint: The Committee will continue its consideration of a report from the Commissioner for Ethical Standards in Public Life in Scotland. For further information, contact the Clerk to the Committee on email at [email protected]. View calendar - Add to calendar |