Nationality and Borders Bill Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate
Department: Home Office
Bambos Charalambous Portrait Bambos Charalambous
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

As I have previously said, international co-operation is at the root of dealing with the problems that this Bill will purportedly address.

Shailesh Vara Portrait Shailesh Vara (North West Cambridgeshire) (Con)
- Hansard - -

Will the hon. Gentleman give way?

Bambos Charalambous Portrait Bambos Charalambous
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I will give way one last time, but then I really must make progress.

Shailesh Vara Portrait Shailesh Vara
- Hansard - -

I am grateful to the hon. Gentleman. As a point of clarification, the comment was made in the previous intervention that Brexit was a Government policy. Does he agree that the Government were fulfilling the mandate of the British people at a referendum?

Bambos Charalambous Portrait Bambos Charalambous
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

We have already had that debate—in the last Parliament. As is proposed in the Dublin III amendment—new clause 49—our safe and legal routes need to be replaced now that we have left the European Union. That is absolutely integral to making sure that we have the measures in place to deal with the problems we face.

Ministers have talked a lot about the Afghan citizens resettlement scheme, but where are the results? We have been waiting since August for the scheme to be implemented, and it still has not been. People are dying. They do not have four years to wait. It is time for action, not words.

We should be looking after people who put their lives on the line by loyally serving the nation. It is nothing short of outrageous that visas for foreigners who served in the UK armed forces cost £2,389. In 2020, there were 5,110 Commonwealth citizens serving in the armed forces. Each year, about 500 of them choose to leave, and those who choose to stay in the UK are compelled to pay extortionate visa fees. A Government consultation has, as we know, proposed scrapping the fees for those who have completed 12 years’ service in the armed forces. Labour has campaigned long and hard for that change, but we believe the proposed qualification period is far too long, and we call on the Government to right that wrong and change the period of qualification. I am grateful to the two largest veterans charities, the Royal British Legion and Help for Heroes, for their campaigning work on this issue. They are clear that they believe the current situation is gravely unfair, and it is time the Government started honouring their promise to the armed forces.