Thames Gateway Bridge: Safeguarding Direction Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate
Department: Department for Transport

Thames Gateway Bridge: Safeguarding Direction

Simon Lightwood Excerpts
Thursday 17th July 2025

(1 day, 18 hours ago)

Written Statements
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Simon Lightwood Portrait The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Transport (Simon Lightwood)
- Hansard - -

Today I am informing the House of my decision to lift the safeguarding direction for the Thames gateway bridge. This reflects the Government’s commitment to ensuring that our transport and infra- structure supports housing delivery and drives growth as part of the plan for change.

Safeguarding is an important planning tool used to protect land for future transport schemes from conflicting development. In this case, the safeguarding direction for the Thames gateway bridge dates back to 1940, when the area’s transport needs were very different. It was intended to protect land for a road crossing that has not been delivered. Since then, London’s transport priorities have evolved, and over the decades, we have seen major investments in London’s river crossings—most notably the Dartford crossing and, recently, the Silvertown tunnel. The safeguarding directions therefore no longer align with the direction of transport policy or the evolving needs of this part of London.

The continued safeguarding of this land has been an obstacle to much-needed development, and I am therefore lifting these directions. The Government are keen to deliver new homes and unlock economic opportunity, and we are taking steps to remove unnecessary barriers to progress.

[HCWS836]