Baroness Prentis of Banbury debates involving the Department for Work and Pensions during the 2017-2019 Parliament

Oral Answers to Questions

Baroness Prentis of Banbury Excerpts
Monday 19th November 2018

(7 years, 3 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Guy Opperman Portrait Guy Opperman
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I think that the hon. Gentleman will accept that while auto-enrolment has been a cross-party success story, it was this Government who actually introduced it. The issue that he raises was comprehensively addressed by the 2017 auto-enrolment review, which was conducted by three independent support organisations, and the key points that he raises are being addressed in the current AE review.

Baroness Prentis of Banbury Portrait Victoria Prentis (Banbury) (Con)
- Hansard - -

14. What steps the Government have taken in Budget 2018 to ensure that people in work keep more of what they earn when in receipt of universal credit.

Lord Sharma Portrait The Minister for Employment (Alok Sharma)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

In the Budget, the Chancellor announced a £1,000-a-year increase in work allowances from April next year. It will provide an annual boost of £630 for about 2.4 million working families across the country.

Baroness Prentis of Banbury Portrait Victoria Prentis
- Hansard - -

Does my hon. Friend welcome those announcements in the Budget? Does he agree that not all Labour’s legacies were as effective as those mentioned in the previous question, and that a system which penalised hard-working people with marginal tax rates as high as 90% was not effective?

Lord Sharma Portrait Alok Sharma
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

My hon. Friend is absolutely right. Under the legacy benefits system, some people faced punitive marginal tax rates. The fixed taper rate under universal credit ensures that work always pays, and that is why we are seeing more people getting into work.

Oral Answers to Questions

Baroness Prentis of Banbury Excerpts
Monday 13th November 2017

(8 years, 3 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Sarah Newton Portrait Sarah Newton
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

It is absolutely right that we get PIP right for everybody with a disability, including those with degenerative diseases such as Parkinson’s. It is absolutely right to notice, as my right hon. Friend the Secretary of State did earlier, that considering that more than 2.6 million PIP assessments have been made, less than 1% have resulted in a complaint. Most of the time, this benefit is got right the first time. Of course, we work tirelessly, including with our stakeholders and voluntary sector organisations, to make improvements.

Baroness Prentis of Banbury Portrait Victoria Prentis (Banbury) (Con)
- Hansard - -

10. What steps his Department has taken to ensure that people do not face financial difficulties while waiting for their first universal credit payment.

David Gauke Portrait The Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (Mr David Gauke)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

Advances are available at the start of a universal credit claim to ensure that those who need it have money to tide them over until their first payment. Our data shows that around half of claimants are receiving advances, and we have recently undertaken an exercise to improve awareness and access to this support.

Baroness Prentis of Banbury Portrait Victoria Prentis
- Hansard - -

I thank the Secretary of State for his very reassuring answer. In Banbury, we are fortunate to have very low unemployment rates. Can he tell me what will be the likely impact on jobs of universal credit roll-out in my constituency?

David Gauke Portrait Mr Gauke
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

In total, it is estimated that universal credit will help around 250,000 more people into employment. On average, that works out at around 400 extra people in work in each parliamentary constituency, but universal credit will, of course, have larger impacts in areas with a higher proportion of benefit claimants or a higher prevalence of single-parent and out-of-work families.