Make dog theft a specific criminal offence

The Government should create a specific offence for dog theft, with 8 years minimum sentencing and a fine of at least £5,000. Dogs are like members of the family to many people and current laws do not reflect this. Dogs are a support network for so many, a family member, a lifeline.

308,050 Signatures

Status
Open
Opened
Friday 20th November 2020
Last 24 hours signatures
3,176
Signature Deadline
Thursday 20th May 2021
Estimated Final Signatures: 313,819

This content was generated for your convenience by Parallel Parliament and does not form part of the official record.
Recent Documents related to Make dog theft a specific criminal offence

1. Make dog theft a specific criminal offence
12/11/2020 - Petitions

Found: Government should create a specific offence for dog theft, with 8 years minimum sentencing and a fine of at least

2. Make cat theft a specific illegal offence.
28/12/2020 - Petitions

Found: A specific offence for cat theft with serious deterrent is needed. An 8 year minimum sentencing and fine

3. Debate on an e-petition relating to protection of police dogs and horses
10/11/2016 - Parliamentary Research

Found: on an e-petition relating to protection of police dogs and horses By Pat Strickland David Hirst, Sarah

4. Wildlife crime
19/03/2019 - Parliamentary Research

Found: not defined. 1.2 Enforcement 3 1.3 Hunting with dogs 4 2. Statistics 7 2.1 Wildlife crime prosecutions

5. Sentencing for Animal Cruelty
04/11/2016 - Parliamentary Research

Found: Westminster Hall on Tuesday 8 November 2016 at 4.30-5.30pm. The Member in charge of the debate is Anna

Latest Documents
Recent Speeches related to Make dog theft a specific criminal offence

1. Pet Theft
19/10/2020 - Westminster Hall

1: will take over from me in half an hour’s time. Members should sanitise their microphones before and after - Speech Link
2: considered e-petitions 244530 and 300071 relating to pet theft.It is an honour to serve under your chairmanship - Speech Link

2. Pet Theft
02/07/2018 - Westminster Hall

1: to pet theft.It is an honour to serve under your chairmanship, Mr Sharma. The pet theft petition - Speech Link

3. Animal Welfare (Sentencing) Bill
23/10/2020 - Commons Chamber

1: Pre-legislative Scrutiny of the draft Animal Welfare (Sentencing and Recognition of Sentience) Bill 2017, HC 709 - Speech Link
2: Speaker, I should like to declare that I am a tenant beef farmer’s son and a former member of the National - Speech Link
3: cruelty, but does he have any indication of how many successful convictions at the moment result in an - Speech Link

4. Wildlife Crime
20/03/2019 - Westminster Hall

1: extending criminal behaviour orders across a wider area than just the county in which the offence took place - Speech Link
2: securing this debate and for his comments about the support of the NFU in trying to deal with some of these - Speech Link

5. Police Dogs and Horses
14/11/2016 - Westminster Hall

1: Before we begin, I should warn Members that the case mentioned in the petition is currently before - Speech Link
2: e-petition 168678 relating to the status of police dogs and horses.Sadly, it is not unusual to read - Speech Link
3: giving way so early in the debate. Our police animals—dogs and horses—are an integral part of the police service - Speech Link

Latest Speeches
Recent Questions related to Make dog theft a specific criminal offence
Latest Questions

You may be interested in these active petitions

1. Make dog on dog attacks a specific criminal offence - 5,823 signatures
2. Make feeding horses/ponies and livestock a specific criminal offence - 9,169 signatures
3. Make lying in the House of Commons a criminal offence - 6,183 signatures
4. Make it a criminal offence for MPs to mislead the public - 110,263 signatures
5. Require local authorities to fund specific domestic abuse services for women - 10,546 signatures

There have been reports of substantial increases in dog theft in recent months, with the most loyal of animals torn away from its family. Thieves think it’s all too easy and the punishment can be nothing compared to the gain with a shocking minority of dogs being reunited with their families.
Dog theft is not currently a specific offence and the crime of theft carries a sentence of up to seven years according to the Theft Act 1968, but this doesn’t target the specific problem which is dog theft.

Dogs should be seen to have their own offence to protect them. Current laws and penalties are not enough justice for the families and dogs that go through this trauma. They protect us, so we will protect them.


Petition Signatures over time

Government Response

Current court sentencing guidelines for theft already take into account the emotional distress that theft of a family pet can have on owners, and already recommend higher penalties for such offences.


We understand the emotional trauma which the theft of a much-loved dog can cause. All reported crimes should be taken seriously, investigated and, where appropriate, taken through the courts and met with tough sentences.

The theft of a dog is already a criminal offence under the Theft Act 1968 and the maximum penalty is seven years’ imprisonment.

If someone causes an animal to suffer in the course of stealing it from its owner, then they are liable to prosecution under the Animal Welfare Act 2006. The existing maximum custodial penalty for causing animal cruelty is 6 months’ imprisonment. However, there is legislation before Parliament – the Animal Welfare (Sentencing) Bill – which when passed will increase the maximum penalty to 5 years’ imprisonment. This will be the highest penalty for animal cruelty in Europe. The Government will support this Bill as it makes its way through Parliament.

Sentencing is entirely a matter for our independent courts and must take into account the circumstances of each case. When deciding on an appropriate sentence, the courts consider any aggravating and mitigating factors, in line with sentencing guidelines issued by the Sentencing Council. In February 2016 the Sentencing Council updated its guidelines in relation to sentencing for theft offences. The guidelines take account of the emotional distress, and therefore harm, that theft of a pet can have on the victim, and accordingly recommends higher penalties for such offences.

While the Government takes the issue of dog theft very seriously and is concerned by suggestions that occurrences are on the rise, we consider the legislative tools we have in place to deal with cases of dog theft to be robust and proportionate. However, as Victoria Prentis MP said on behalf of the Government at the recent Westminster Hall debate on pet theft, we continue to keep things under review and are keen to explore ways to address the issue that will be effective and have a meaningful impact on the problem at hand. That includes working with interested parties, including the police and animal welfare organisations to try and get messages across to the pet owners to help them keep their pets safe.

It is important to raise awareness of precautions that owners can take to reduce risk of dog theft and increase the chances of owners being reunited with lost or stolen dogs. For dog owners this includes never letting their pet out of sight when it is being exercised; varying their routines when walking their dogs and not leaving their dog unattended when in public.

The law requires that dogs must be microchipped, and their details recorded on a database. Since we made microchipping compulsory, the proportion of dogs microchipped has gone up from around 58% of all dogs in 2013 to over 90% of all dogs. This means that about 8.5 million dogs in the United Kingdom are microchipped. We have also committed to introducing compulsory cat microchipping.

Owners should report the theft of their dog to the database on which the animal’s microchip is registered, along with the corresponding crime reference number. There is a much better chance that dogs who become lost or stolen will be returned to their owners if they are microchipped and their records kept up to date.

Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs


Constituency Data

Reticulating Splines