Any legislative or judicial review must consult the groups it impacts

We think there are numerous recent examples of a lack of consultation on significant changes that impact groups of people. We think it should be law that any such significant changes are first consulted with 3 bodies that represent that group(s) before a change is made.

This petition closed on 12 Nov 2025 with 79 signatures


Reticulating Splines

You may be interested in these active petitions

1. Conduct a review of political news regulation by Ofcom - 2,654 signatures
2. Instruct NHS England to revoke adoption of the IHRA definition of antisemitism - 3,439 signatures
3. Review the UK’s policy toward the Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus - 2,527 signatures
4. Review the evidence and fund the addition of SMA to the Newborn Screening Test - 133,378 signatures
5. Make a law to protect ILR from abolition and retrospective changes - 2,144 signatures

Welfare shakeup (18.03.25), Cass review (April 2024), and Changes to NI (13.11.24). All of these and more changes or rulings have impacted sets of people but we think their consultations were not sufficient. Although ONS may contribute to the report, it may not take into account lived experiences, niche problematic areas that we think need further definition or areas that just haven't considered. We think this creates further work and doesn't allow groups of people a voice in changes impacting them.


Petition Signatures over time

Constituency Data

Reticulating Splines