Schools: Risk Management

(asked on 1st December 2017) - View Source

Question to the Department for Education:

To ask the Secretary of State for Education, pursuant to Answer of 1 December 2017 to Question 114844, what estimate he has made of the level of savings by schools of using the risk protection arrangement scheme instead of commercial cover.


Answered by
Robert Goodwill Portrait
Robert Goodwill
This question was answered on 11th December 2017

As a result of the reduction in the per pupil risk protection arrangement (RPA) general annual grant deduction from £25 to £20 from September 2016, academy trusts realise direct savings of £5 per pupil and are expected to directly save a total of £22 million by August 2018.

Analysis of academy account returns from academic year 2015/16 show that on average, an RPA member will spend £36.68 per pupil on all their insurance requirements, whereas a non-member will spend on average £54.07. This indicates that there is a saving of around £17.39 per pupil for schools which opt into the RPA. Applying the above figures across 2014/15 & 2015/16 we estimate that the RPA would have saved £83.1 million in relation to members.

Over the first two years of operation, we have also seen commercial premiums drop from an average of £75.05 per pupil in academic year 2013/14 before the RPA launched. Applying the above figures across 2014/15 and 2015/16 we estimate that the RPA would have saved £63.6 million in relation to non-members.

Please note that these figures are based on the latest account return data and the savings cannot be linked directly to the RPA.

Reticulating Splines