Question to the Department for Transport:
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, how much funding from the public purse has been allocated to transport infrastructure projects in each region of England in each of the past three years; and what estimate he has made of that funding per head of population in those regions.
Figures on public sector expenditure at a regional level are part of the Government’s Country and Regional Analysis (CRA) statistics.
The latest CRA statistics, published by HM Treasury in November 2017, present data up to 2016-17 and are published at:
https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/country-and-regional-analysis.
The statistics include spend on transport by all public sector organisations including the Department for Transport, Local Authorities, Public Corporations (in the case of transport, this is mainly spend by London Underground) and other Government Departments including devolved administrations.
When assessing expenditure across regions it is important to compare like with like. The benefits from spend on transport interventions often accrue to people far beyond the residents of the immediate local area or region. This is particularly the case for spending on the railways which connect cities and regions across the country and deliver broader benefits beyond the region concerned. Furthermore, when expenditure is presented on a “per head of population”(or “per capita”) basis, it does not account for the pressure that large numbers of commuters and visitors from outside a region can add to the transport networks. In addition, larger built-up areas tend to make greater use of mass public transport systems, though these will generate fares income which contributes to their operating costs.
Statistics for public sector capital expenditure by region are given in Table 1 below. Table 2 provides the equivalent statistics per capita. Capital expenditure has been used as a proxy for spending on infrastructure specifically.
Table 1: Capital spending on all transport, by all public sector bodies
£millions nominal
Region | 2014-15 | 2015-161 | 2016-17 |
England - East | 1,176 | 1,404 | 1,450 |
England - East Midlands | 749 | 799 | 666 |
England - London | 4,550 | 5,247 | 6,082 |
England - North East | 417 | 474 | 520 |
England - North West | 1,358 | 1,891 | 1,775 |
England - South East | 1,571 | 2,002 | 2,211 |
England - South West | 802 | 1,008 | 1,165 |
England - West Midlands | 1,080 | 1,333 | 1,260 |
England - Yorkshire and Humber | 1,085 | 1,297 | 1,092 |
England | 12,787 | 15,455 | 16,221 |
1Due to the reclassification of Network Rail into the public sector from 2015-16, care should be taken when making historical comparisons.
Source: https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/country-and-regional-analysis-2017
Table 2: Capital spending, on all transport, by all public sector bodies, per capita
£s nominal
Region | 2014-15 | 2015-161 | 2016-17 |
England - East | 195 | 231 | 236 |
England - East Midlands | 161 | 171 | 141 |
England - London | 533 | 605 | 693 |
England - North East | 159 | 181 | 197 |
England - North West | 190 | 264 | 246 |
England - South East | 177 | 224 | 245 |
England - South West | 148 | 184 | 211 |
England - West Midlands | 189 | 232 | 217 |
England - Yorkshire and Humber | 202 | 241 | 201 |
England | 235 | 282 | 293 |
1Due to the reclassification of Network Rail into the public sector from 2015-16, care should be taken when making historical comparisons.
Source: https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/country-and-regional-analysis-2017
For future years, the Infrastructure and Projects Authority’s (IPA) National Infrastructure and Construction Pipeline (NCIP) 2017 shows regional transport spend. Analysis of the NCIP shows that central government transport investment is more balanced across regions than previous reports have suggested. The table below sets out the allocation of central government transport capital spending in the pipeline between 2017/18 and 2020/21, per head and across regions [1]
Region | Investment per capita £ (2016/17 prices) |
East of England | 994 |
East Midlands | 946 |
London[1] | 1,026 |
North East | 822 |
North West | 1,353 |
South East | 1,139 |
South West | 851 |
West Midlands | 1,269 |
Yorkshire and the Humber | 726 |
[1] As this table only looks at transport capital spending funded by central government, TfL expenditure is excluded. TfL’s capital programme is funded by a mixture of locally-retained business rates and fare receipts from TfL-operated services, and from 2017/18 onwards it receives no direct central government funding. However, DfT does directly fund major transport projects across London, such as Crossrail, and Thameslink
[1] As this table only looks at transport capital spending funded by central government, TfL expenditure is excluded. TfL’s capital programme is funded by a mixture of locally-retained business rates and fare receipts from TfL-operated services, and from 2017/18 onwards it receives no direct central government funding. However, DfT does directly fund major transport projects across London, such as Crossrail, and Thameslink
1. Estimates - Spending of the Department of Transport
23/02/2018 - Parliamentary Research
Found: Department of Transport By Tom Rutherford Summary Total public spending on Transport in 2016/17 was
2. National Infrastructure and Construction Pipeline 2018
27/02/2019 - Infrastructure and Projects Authority (IPA)
- View source
Found: Analysis of the National Infrastructure and
Construction Pipeline26 November 2018Reporting to Cabinet
3. Full report - Investigation into devolved funding
13/03/2019 - National Audit Office
Found: General
HM Treasury
Investigation into devolved funding
HC 1990
SESSION 2017Œ2019
13 MARCH 2019
A picture
4. Country and regional public sector finances
30/05/2019 - Parliamentary Research
Found: Number 8027, 30 May 2019 Country and regional public sector finances By Matthew Keep Contents: 1.
5. Northern Powerhouse Partnership - written evidence
03/09/2019 - Inquiry: Regional Imbalances in the UK Economy - Treasury Committee
- View source
Found: North of England and the rest of the country. As our evidence below shows, progress has been made with the
1. Wales: European Structural Funds
05/02/2020 - Lords Chamber
1: repeat the arguments we have had over the past four years concerning our membership of the European Union - Speech Link
2. Shared Prosperity Fund
14/05/2019 - Westminster Hall
1: and correspondence with the Government over the past year. However, it is right that today we take the - Speech Link
2: resources available to them. European or Government funding can often come with limitations that inhibit creative - Speech Link
3: thing that investors asked was what our skills, transport systems and so forth were like. If we could not - Speech Link
3. Transport in the North
06/11/2017 - Commons Chamber
1: to move,That this House has considered transport in the North.It is very nice to see a fellow - Speech Link
2: the significant disparity between investment in transport in the North, and in London and the south-east - Speech Link
4. EU Structural Funds: Least Developed Regions
26/06/2019 - Westminster Hall
1: replacement of EU structural funds for least developed regions.It is a pleasure to see you in the Chair - Speech Link
2: Wales and the valleys are already recipients of funding for that category, but have been joined by Tees - Speech Link
5. Rail Infrastructure Investment
17/01/2019 - Westminster Hall
1: considered the Fourth Report of the Transport Committee, Rail infrastructure investment, HC 582, and the Government - Speech Link
2: considered the Fourth Report of the Transport Committee, Rail infrastructure investment, HC 582, and the Government - Speech Link