Apr. 08 2025
Source Page: Report on Scottish Government Responsible Dog Ownership Summit – Discussions with key stakeholders on approaches to dog control and dog welfare 20 September 2024Found: This would be confined to dogs which are dangerous and which for public safety reasons the police need
Asked by: Grahame, Christine (Scottish National Party - Midlothian South, Tweeddale and Lauderdale)
Question
To ask the Scottish Government whether there is any means by which the owner of an XL bully dog can obtain a court order authorising a late application for inclusion on the Index of Exempted Dogs, other than following seizure of the dog and a conviction under section 1(3) of the Dangerous Dogs Act 1991, as amended by the Dangerous Dogs (Designated Types) (Scotland) Order 2024.
Answered by Brown, Siobhian - Minister for Victims and Community Safety
XL Bully owners in Scotland had from 1 April 2024 to 31 July 2024 to apply to the Scottish Government for a Certificate of Exemption for their XL Bully dog, to allow them to legally keep their dog. Under the relevant legislation that set these dates, the time period for applications for a Certificate of Exemption to keep an XL Bully dog has closed.
The only means by which an exemption can be granted now is as follows.
The XL Bully dog is on the list of prohibited dogs under the Dangerous Dogs Act 1991.
Following the passing of the Dangerous Dogs (Amendment) Act 1997, it continued to be the case that it is a criminal offence to own a prohibited type of dog, but following a conviction the court has discretion in sentencing so that a dog of this type is not always required to be destroyed where an owner was found to have kept a dog in breach of the legislation.
The court can, as an alternative to ordering the destruction of the dog, authorise a person owning such a dog to be able to apply to place the dog on the Index of the Exempted Dogs. Only courts can direct that an owner can be authorised to apply for a dog to be placed on the Index of Exempted Dogs.
The Scottish Government does not have any role to play in the decision making of the independent court when it considers how to dispose of cases, but will of course consider any application for exemption on the back of any court direction that would permit the owner of an XL Bully dog to apply to Scottish Ministers to seek a Certificate of Exemption.
Mentions:
1: Lord Howard of Rising (Con - Life peer) the Dangerous Wild Animals Act 1976 or the Dangerous Dogs Act 1991 should be counted as pets. - Speech Link
2: None wild animal under the Dangerous Wild Animals Act 1976, or in breach of the Dangerous Dogs Act 1991. - Speech Link
3: Baroness Taylor of Stevenage (Lab - Life peer) wild animal under the Dangerous Wild Animals Act 1976, or in breach of the Dangerous Dogs Act 1991. - Speech Link
4: Lord Truscott (Non-affiliated - Life peer) As we also heard earlier, not all properties are suitable for dogs, especially large dogs. - Speech Link
Asked by: Burnett, Alexander (Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party - Aberdeenshire West)
Question
To ask the Scottish Government how many people have been charged with not having an exemption certificate for XL bully dogs, following the change in legislation that came into force on 1 August 2024.
Answered by Brown, Siobhian - Minister for Victims and Community Safety
From 1 August to 31 December 2024, 33 charges under the Dangerous Dogs Act 1991 have been reported to the Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service (COPFS) which make reference to ownership of XL Bully Dogs.
It should be noted that COPFS use a live, operational database to manage the process of reports submitted to Procurators Fiscal by the police and other reporting agencies throughout Scotland. Information provided is at date of extract and may therefore be subject to change as data and systems are updated for operational reasons.
Mentions:
1: None You may use “you” to me—if I, say, had a dangerous dog—but otherwise, “you” should not be used to address - Speech Link
2: Ann Davies (PC - Caerfyrddin) or dogs in their charge, and what that means. - Speech Link
3: Sadik Al-Hassan (Lab - North Somerset) It is not about punishing dogs or pet owners. - Speech Link
4: Ashley Fox (Con - Bridgwater) This measure makes it easier to prevent the most dangerous dogs from causing further harm to livestock.Perhaps - Speech Link