To match an exact phrase, use quotation marks around the search term. eg. "Parliamentary Estate". Use "OR" or "AND" as link words to form more complex queries.


View sample alert

Keep yourself up-to-date with the latest developments by exploring our subscription options to receive notifications direct to your inbox

Written Question
Primodos
Thursday 14th March 2024

Asked by: Jeff Smith (Labour - Manchester Withington)

Question to the Department of Health and Social Care:

To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, whether she has made an assessment of the potential implications for her Department’s policies of the report by the APPG on Hormone Pregnancy Test entitled Bitter Pill: Primodos - the forgotten thalidomide, published on 27 February 2024.

Answered by Maria Caulfield

We remain hugely sympathetic to the families who believe that they have suffered due to the use of Hormone Pregnancy Tests (HPTs). In 2017 an independent Expert Working Group conducted a comprehensive review of the available scientific evidence, and concluded that the data did not support a causal association between the use of HPTs, such as Primodos, and adverse pregnancy outcomes. This remains the Government’s position. The Government has committed to reviewing any new evidence related to HPTs, and a possible causal association with adverse pregnancy outcomes.


Written Question
Primodos
Thursday 14th March 2024

Asked by: Jeff Smith (Labour - Manchester Withington)

Question to the Department of Health and Social Care:

To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, if she will implement the recommendations in the report by the APPG on Hormone Pregnancy Test entitled Bitter Pill: Primodos - the forgotten thalidomide, published on 27 February 2024.

Answered by Maria Caulfield

We remain hugely sympathetic to the families who believe that they have suffered due to the use of Hormone Pregnancy Tests (HPTs). In 2017 an independent Expert Working Group conducted a comprehensive review of the available scientific evidence, and concluded that the data did not support a causal association between the use of HPTs, such as Primodos, and adverse pregnancy outcomes. This remains the Government’s position. The Government has committed to reviewing any new evidence related to HPTs, and a possible causal association with adverse pregnancy outcomes.


Written Question
Primodos: Compensation
Monday 25th September 2023

Asked by: Gavin Williamson (Conservative - Stone, Great Wyrley and Penkridge)

Question to the Department of Health and Social Care:

To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, whether he plans to take steps to secure financial redress for the victims of Primodos.

Answered by Maria Caulfield

The Government published its response to the Independent Medicines and Medical Devices Safety (IMMDS) review in July 2021, which did not accept the recommendation to establish separate redress schemes for the three interventions covered by the review. This included a redress scheme for those harmed by Primodos.

Our priority is to make medicines and devices safer, and the Government is pursuing a wide range of activity to further this aim. The 2021 response, and the Government’s December 2022 update to the response, explains the changes that have been put in place since the IMMDS Review report’s publication, and the further action the Government will take to implement the recommendations accepted and to improve patient safety.

In the recent House of Commons debate of 7 September 2023 on hormone pregnancy tests, I committed to review the outstanding recommendations in relation to Primodos.


Written Question
Hormone Pregnancy Tests Expert Working Group
Wednesday 30th November 2022

Asked by: Tony Lloyd (Labour - Rochdale)

Question to the Department of Health and Social Care:

To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, whether he plans to publish the findings of the Expert Working Group review on Hormone Pregnancy Tests.

Answered by Maria Caulfield

The ‘Report of the Commission on Human Medicines’ Expert Working Group on Hormone Pregnancy Tests’ was published on 15 November 2017 and is available at the following link:

https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/report-of-the-commission-on-human-medicines-expert-working-group-on-hormone-pregnancy-tests


Written Question
Pregnancy Tests
Wednesday 30th November 2022

Asked by: Tony Lloyd (Labour - Rochdale)

Question to the Department of Health and Social Care:

To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what recent reassessment he has made of the implications for his policies of the recommendations in the Independent Medicines and Medical Devices Safety Review for victims of hormone pregnancy tests.

Answered by Maria Caulfield

The Government published its response to the Independent Medicines and Medical Devices Safety review in July 2021. We will provide an update on progress on implementing the response in due course.


Written Question
Pregnancy Tests
Wednesday 30th November 2022

Asked by: Tony Lloyd (Labour - Rochdale)

Question to the Department of Health and Social Care:

To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what recent assessment he has made of the potential merits of providing redress for victims of Hormone Pregnancy Tests.

Answered by Maria Caulfield

The Government’s response to the Independent Medicines and Medical Devices Safety Review did not accept the recommendation relating to redress, including for hormone pregnancy tests. We are prioritising improving the future safety of medicines and medical devices through high standards for industry to market and manufacture products.


Written Question
Pregnancy Tests
Wednesday 2nd November 2022

Asked by: Ed Davey (Liberal Democrat - Kingston and Surbiton)

Question to the Department of Health and Social Care:

To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what recent assessment she has made the potential merits of providing redress for victims of Hormone Pregnancy Tests.

Answered by Maria Caulfield

The Government’s response to the Independent Medicines and Medical Devices Safety review did not accept the recommendation relating to redress for the three interventions addressed, including hormone pregnancy tests.

We are prioritising improvements in the safety of medicines and medical devices and high standards for industry to market and manufacture products to reduce harm in the future.


Written Question
Pregnancy Tests
Tuesday 1st November 2022

Asked by: Ed Davey (Liberal Democrat - Kingston and Surbiton)

Question to the Department of Health and Social Care:

To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what recent reassessment she has made of the implications for her policy of the recommendations in the Independent Medicines and Medical Devices Safety Review for victims of hormone pregnancy tests.

Answered by Maria Caulfield

We will publish an update on progress to implement the Government’s response in due course.


Written Question
Pregnancy Tests
Tuesday 1st November 2022

Asked by: Ed Davey (Liberal Democrat - Kingston and Surbiton)

Question to the Department of Health and Social Care:

To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, whether she will reassess the findings of the Expert Working Group review on Hormone Pregnancy Tests.

Answered by Maria Caulfield

We have no plans to do so.


Written Question
Pregnancy Tests
Tuesday 25th October 2022

Asked by: Dan Carden (Labour - Liverpool Walton)

Question to the Department of Health and Social Care:

To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, if she will commission an independent review of the report by the Expert Working Group of the Commission on Human Medicines on Hormone Pregnancy Tests, published on 15 November 2017.

Answered by Caroline Johnson - Shadow Minister (Health and Social Care)

We have no plans to do so.