Asked by: Alan Campbell (Labour - Tynemouth)
Question to the Department of Health and Social Care:
To ask the Secretary of State for Health, how much was spent by North Tyneside Clinical Commissioning Group on the formal process entered into in January 2017 to secure a new provider for urgent care services in North Tyneside.
Answered by Philip Dunne
NHS England advises that NHS North Tyneside Clinical Commissioning Group’s (CCGs) spending on legal advice since 2014/15 is as follows:
2014/15 £9,826
2015/16 £49,064
2016/17 £40,837
2017/18 £40,692 (year-to-date, up to end of October 2017, month seven)
Please note that legal costs listed include all costs incurred as a result of direct patient care, and do not just relate to advice in respect of organisations or contracts.
The year-to-date figure for 2017/18 includes £17,281 in respect of the CCG’s response to the legal challenge to the urgent care procurement process earlier this year, and £1,281 in relation to the new urgent care work which is currently underway. There are no further costs associated with the urgent care procurement process, as this work is carried out by officers of the CCG and North of England Commissioning Support as part of their normal work.
Asked by: Andrew Stephenson (Conservative - Pendle)
Question to the Department of Health and Social Care:
To ask the Secretary of State for Health, how many people have entered the Improving Access to Psychological Therapies Programme in (a) England, (b) the North West and (c) East Lancashire in each of the last three years.
Answered by Baroness Blackwood of North Oxford
The table provides figures for the number of referrals entering Improving Access to Psychological Therapies (IAPT) treatment by clinical commissioning group (CCG), England, 2012-13, 2013-14, and 2014-15.
England |
|
|
|
| |
| Number of referrals entering treatment | ||||
CCG Code | CCG Name | 2012-13 | 2013-14 | 2014-15 | |
| All England | 434,247 | 709,117 | 815,665 | |
00C | NHS Darlington CCG | 1,015 | 1,360 | 1,310 | |
00D | NHS Durham Dales, Easington and Sedgefield CCG | 2,834 | 3,470 | 3,420 | |
00F | NHS Gateshead CCG | 3,075 | 3,735 | 4,200 | |
00G | NHS Newcastle North and East CCG | 1,370 | 3,525 | 3,400 | |
00H | NHS Newcastle West CCG | 1,122 | 2,610 | 2,485 | |
00J | NHS North Durham CCG | 2,829 | 3,190 | 3,285 | |
00K | NHS Hartlepool and Stockton-On-Tees CCG | 2,837 | 7,050 | 5,605 | |
00L | NHS Northumberland CCG | 4,541 | 6,800 | 6,410 | |
00M | NHS South Tees CCG | 3,339 | 5,820 | 4,650 | |
00N | NHS South Tyneside CCG | 2,060 | 3,050 | 3,655 | |
00P | NHS Sunderland CCG | 1,312 | 5,220 | 5,615 | |
00Q | NHS Blackburn with Darwen CCG | 1,098 | 1,280 | 3,305 | |
00R | NHS Blackpool CCG | 268 | 1,730 | 2,340 | |
00T | NHS Bolton CCG | 11 | 4,760 | 5,690 | |
00V | NHS Bury CCG | 1,710 | 3,070 | 4,220 | |
00W | NHS Central Manchester CCG | 1,269 | 1,750 | 1,960 | |
00X | NHS Chorley and South Ribble CCG | 1,816 | 2,225 | 3,200 | |
00Y | NHS Oldham CCG | 564 | 2,330 | 3,760 | |
01A | NHS East Lancashire CCG | 3,420 | 3,495 | 6,980 | |
01C | NHS Eastern Cheshire CCG | 1,093 | 1,985 | 1,965 | |
01D | NHS Heywood, Middleton and Rochdale CCG | 1,156 | 3,280 | 4,425 | |
01E | NHS Greater Preston CCG | 3,096 | 2,260 | 3,960 | |
01F | NHS Halton CCG | 572 | 750 | 1,455 | |
01G | NHS Salford CCG | 1,767 | 5,255 | 6,930 | |
01H | NHS Cumbria CCG | 8,441 | 8,690 | 7,260 | |
01J | NHS Knowsley CCG | 861 | 1,915 | 2,575 | |
01K | NHS Lancashire North CCG | 1,511 | 1,505 | 3,030 | |
01M | NHS North Manchester CCG | 786 | 1,465 | 1,720 | |
01N | NHS South Manchester CCG | 1,392 | 1,660 | 1,825 | |
01R | NHS South Cheshire CCG | 1,158 | 2,085 | 1,920 | |
01T | NHS South Sefton CCG | 1,630 | 2,170 | 3,185 | |
01V | NHS Southport And Formby CCG | 1,130 | 1,490 | 2,100 | |
01W | NHS Stockport CCG | 1,274 | 2,330 | 5,290 | |
01X | NHS St Helens CCG | 990 | 1,070 | 1,885 | |
01Y | NHS Tameside and Glossop CCG | 970 | 2,045 | 5,505 | |
02A | NHS Trafford CCG | 3,182 | 3,840 | 4,405 | |
02D | NHS Vale Royal CCG | 755 | 1,375 | 1,255 | |
02E | NHS Warrington CCG | 694 | 3,250 | 3,265 | |
02F | NHS West Cheshire CCG | 4,803 | 4,350 | 4,515 | |
02G | NHS West Lancashire CCG | 1,454 | 1,635 | 2,155 | |
02H | NHS Wigan Borough CCG | 3,536 | 6,020 | 3,990 | |
02M | NHS Fylde and Wyre CCG | 1,534 | 1,510 | 2,550 | |
12F | NHS Wirral CCG | 3,323 | 4,080 | 5,410 | |
99A | NHS Liverpool CCG | 6,684 | 8,115 | 9,420 | |
99C | NHS North Tyneside CCG | 0 | 5,015 | 3,810 | |
Data source: IAPT, Health and Social Care Information Centre (HSCIC)
Notes:
1. A referral is classified as having entered treatment if it has a first, attended treatment appointment in the year.
2. For 2012-13, referrals entering treatment is a subset of referrals received in the year, as this was the first year of the IAPT programme.
3. For 2014-15, CCG is the recorded commissioner, unless this was not recorded or not a CCG, in which case the CCG is derived from the patient’s general practitioner (GP) practice or postcode. For 2013-14 and 2012-13, CCG is based on GP Practice. Where CCG and GP Practice were not recorded and could not be assigned, the referral is categorised as 'Unknown'. A list of valid CCGs can be found on the HSCIC website at:
http://systems.hscic.gov.uk/data/ods/datadownloads/othernhs
4. For this response, we are defining North West and East Lancashire as those CCGs within the following NHS Health Authority regions: Q74 - NHS England North (Cumbria and North East), Q75 - NHS England North (Cheshire and Merseyside), Q83 - NHS England North (Greater Manchester), Q84 - NHS England North (Lancashire).
Asked by: Alan Campbell (Labour - Tynemouth)
Question to the Department of Health and Social Care:
To ask the Secretary of State for Health, how many patients have been referred to the About Health Group from practices in the North Tyneside Clinical Commissioning Group under the General Practitioners' Referral Management System.
Answered by Ben Gummer
NHS North Tyneside Clinical Commissioning Group (CCG) has introduced a formal referral management system across a small number of clinical specialties. This is a local initiative and not part of a wider scheme. The data requested are not collected centrally. This is a matter for the North Tyneside CCG who can advise on data availability.
Asked by: Alan Campbell (Labour - Tynemouth)
Question to the Department of Health and Social Care:
To ask the Secretary of State for Health, how many patients referred to the About Health Group from practices in the North Tyneside Clinical Commissioning Group under the General Practitioners' Referral Management System were subsequently refused treatment.
Answered by Ben Gummer
NHS North Tyneside Clinical Commissioning Group (CCG) has introduced a formal referral management system across a small number of clinical specialties. This is a local initiative and not part of a wider scheme. The data requested are not collected centrally. This is a matter for the North Tyneside CCG who can advise on data availability.
Asked by: Alan Campbell (Labour - Tynemouth)
Question to the Department of Health and Social Care:
To ask the Secretary of State for Health, whether the North Tyneside Clinical Commissioning Group is a pilot under the General Practitioners' Referral Management System.
Answered by Ben Gummer
NHS North Tyneside Clinical Commissioning Group (CCG) has introduced a formal referral management system across a small number of clinical specialties. This is a local initiative and not part of a wider scheme. The data requested are not collected centrally. This is a matter for the North Tyneside CCG who can advise on data availability.
Asked by: Alan Campbell (Labour - Tynemouth)
Question to the Department of Health and Social Care:
To ask the Secretary of State for Health, how much is paid to the About Health Group for each patient referred by practices in the North Tyneside Clinical Commissioning Group under the General Practitioners' Referral Management System.
Answered by Ben Gummer
NHS North Tyneside Clinical Commissioning Group (CCG) has introduced a formal referral management system across a small number of clinical specialties. This is a local initiative and not part of a wider scheme. The data requested are not collected centrally. This is a matter for the North Tyneside CCG who can advise on data availability.
Asked by: Bridget Phillipson (Labour - Houghton and Sunderland South)
Question to the Department of Health and Social Care:
To ask the Secretary of State for Health, what estimate he has made of funding available to NHS palliative care in (a) England, (b) the North East and (c) Sunderland in (i) 2014 and (ii) 2015.
Answered by Ben Gummer
The information is not available in the format requested. Such information as is available is shown in the following table.
Clinical Commissioning Group (CCG) Expenditure on End of Life Care, 2013/14 (£ million)
All CCGs in England | 472.75 |
North East CCGs | 24.35 |
NHS Sunderland CCG | 2.52 |
Source: Programme Budgeting Collection, NHS England
Notes:
https://www.england.nhs.uk/resources/resources-for-ccgs/prog-budgeting/
Asked by: Keith Vaz (Labour - Leicester East)
Question to the Department of Health and Social Care:
To ask the Secretary of State for Health, what estimate he has made of the number of people in each county who have diabetes.
Answered by Jane Ellison
The information on estimates of people in each county who have diabetes is not available in the format requested. The table below shows the estimated number of people with diabetes for upper tier district authorities. The estimates ranges from 5.4% in the City of London, to 10.7% in Brent.
Estimated ranges of people with diabetes for upper tier district authorities for 2014
2014 | Number | Prevalence |
England | 3,279,925 | 7.5% |
Buckinghamshire CC | 28,986 | 7.1% |
Cambridgeshire CC | 35,215 | 6.7% |
Cumbria CC | 33,879 | 8.0% |
Derbyshire CC | 48,864 | 7.6% |
Devon CC | 52,629 | 8.1% |
Dorset CC | 30,060 | 8.7% |
East Sussex CC | 37,859 | 8.6% |
Essex CC | 87,202 | 7.2% |
Gloucestershire CC | 36,877 | 7.4% |
Hampshire CC | 77,073 | 7.1% |
Hertfordshire CC | 62,079 | 6.8% |
Kent CC | 90,195 | 7.5% |
Lancashire CC | 76,349 | 7.8% |
Leicestershire CC | 40,535 | 7.4% |
Lincolnshire CC | 48,338 | 8.0% |
Norfolk CC | 59,406 | 7.9% |
Northamptonshire CC | 41,475 | 7.1% |
North Yorkshire CC | 39,207 | 7.7% |
Nottinghamshire CC | 49,494 | 7.5% |
Oxfordshire CC | 35,376 | 6.6% |
Somerset CC | 36,052 | 8.0% |
Staffordshire CC | 52,956 | 7.6% |
Suffolk CC | 47,835 | 7.7% |
Surrey CC | 62,828 | 6.8% |
Warwickshire CC | 34,255 | 7.5% |
West Sussex CC | 52,761 | 7.8% |
Worcestershire CC | 36,287 | 7.8% |
City of London LB | 693 | 5.4% |
Barking and Dagenham LB | 9,942 | 7.5% |
Barnet LB | 23,493 | 8.2% |
Bexley LB | 13,716 | 7.3% |
Brent LB | 21,497 | 10.7% |
Bromley LB | 18,676 | 7.2% |
Camden LB | 12,758 | 6.1% |
Croydon LB | 23,737 | 8.5% |
Ealing LB | 22,765 | 8.8% |
Enfield LB | 19,233 | 8.2% |
Greenwich LB | 13,330 | 7.3% |
Hackney LB | 13,882 | 8.1% |
Hammersmith and Fulham LB | 9,120 | 6.5% |
Haringey LB | 14,316 | 7.7% |
Harrow LB | 18,567 | 9.6% |
Havering LB | 14,746 | 7.5% |
Hillingdon LB | 16,509 | 7.6% |
Hounslow LB | 16,311 | 8.3% |
Islington LB | 10,389 | 6.3% |
Kensington and Chelsea LB | 11,515 | 7.6% |
Kingston upon Thames LB | 9,119 | 6.2% |
Lambeth LB | 16,069 | 6.6% |
Lewisham LB | 15,799 | 7.1% |
Merton LB | 11,751 | 6.6% |
Newham LB | 17,950 | 10.1% |
Redbridge LB | 19,326 | 8.8% |
Richmond upon Thames LB | 10,345 | 6.3% |
Southwark LB | 16,709 | 6.5% |
Sutton LB | 11,149 | 6.9% |
Tower Hamlets LB | 14,360 | 7.2% |
Waltham Forest LB | 14,919 | 8.5% |
Wandsworth LB | 14,232 | 5.8% |
Westminster LB | 15,354 | 6.4% |
Bolton MD | 17,905 | 8.4% |
Bury MD | 11,054 | 7.5% |
Manchester MD | 27,051 | 6.5% |
Oldham MD | 14,368 | 8.4% |
Rochdale MD | 13,608 | 8.4% |
Salford MD | 13,212 | 6.9% |
Stockport MD | 17,225 | 7.4% |
Tameside MD | 14,001 | 7.9% |
Trafford MD | 12,732 | 7.2% |
Wigan MD | 18,785 | 7.4% |
Knowsley MD | 9,246 | 7.7% |
Liverpool MD | 26,281 | 7.1% |
St Helens MD | 11,119 | 7.6% |
Sefton MD | 17,851 | 8.0% |
Wirral MD | 19,508 | 7.9% |
Barnsley MD | 14,456 | 7.6% |
Doncaster MD | 18,782 | 7.9% |
Rotherham MD | 16,434 | 7.8% |
Sheffield MD | 33,060 | 7.0% |
Gateshead MD | 12,158 | 7.6% |
Newcastle upon Tyne MD | 16,034 | 6.6% |
North Tyneside MD | 12,242 | 7.3% |
South Tyneside MD | 9,982 | 7.8% |
Sunderland MD | 17,552 | 7.5% |
Birmingham MD | 72,576 | 8.8% |
Coventry MD | 20,609 | 7.9% |
Dudley MD | 20,361 | 8.0% |
Sandwell MD | 22,244 | 9.5% |
Solihull MD | 13,109 | 7.7% |
Walsall MD | 18,340 | 9.0% |
Wolverhampton MD | 19,090 | 9.8% |
Bradford MD | 35,136 | 8.5% |
Calderdale MD | 12,987 | 7.7% |
Kirklees MD | 27,064 | 8.1% |
Leeds MD | 45,596 | 6.5% |
Wakefield MD | 20,763 | 7.6% |
Hartlepool UA | 5,690 | 7.6% |
Middlesbrough UA | 8,791 | 7.7% |
Redcar and Cleveland UA | 9,121 | 8.1% |
Stockton-on-Tees UA | 11,330 | 7.1% |
Darlington UA | 6,314 | 7.6% |
County Durham UA | 32,455 | 7.6% |
Northumberland UA | 21,048 | 8.0% |
Cheshire East UA | 22,235 | 7.3% |
Halton UA | 7,168 | 7.5% |
Warrington UA | 11,560 | 7.0% |
Cheshire West and Chester UA | 19,617 | 7.2% |
Blackburn with Darwen UA | 9,525 | 8.9% |
Blackpool UA | 9,541 | 8.4% |
Kingston upon Hull UA | 15,411 | 6.8% |
East Riding of Yorkshire UA | 23,168 | 7.8% |
North East Lincolnshire UA | 9,927 | 7.7% |
North Lincolnshire UA | 10,872 | 7.9% |
York UA | 10,873 | 6.1% |
Derby UA | 15,433 | 7.5% |
Leicester UA | 24,459 | 9.5% |
Rutland UA | 2,379 | 7.5% |
Nottingham UA | 16,958 | 6.4% |
Herefordshire County UA | 12,831 | 8.4% |
Telford and Wrekin UA | 9,834 | 7.4% |
Shropshire UA | 19,867 | 8.0% |
Stoke-on-Trent UA | 15,358 | 7.9% |
Bath and North East Somerset UA | 9,907 | 6.4% |
Bristol UA | 23,189 | 5.9% |
North Somerset UA | 14,094 | 7.6% |
South Gloucestershire UA | 14,422 | 6.3% |
Cornwall UA | 37,893 | 8.1% |
Plymouth UA | 14,805 | 6.7% |
Torbay UA | 9,947 | 8.6% |
Bournemouth UA | 10,006 | 7.1% |
Poole UA | 9,052 | 7.6% |
Swindon UA | 11,443 | 6.7% |
Wiltshire UA | 27,724 | 7.2% |
Peterborough UA | 10,850 | 7.6% |
Luton UA | 12,685 | 8.2% |
Bedford UA | 10,228 | 7.7% |
Central Bedfordshire UA | 14,494 | 6.7% |
Southend-on-Sea UA | 10,646 | 7.7% |
Thurrock UA | 8,951 | 6.7% |
Medway UA | 14,548 | 7.0% |
Bracknell Forest UA | 5,833 | 6.1% |
West Berkshire UA | 8,445 | 6.7% |
Reading UA | 7,789 | 6.0% |
Slough UA | 9,181 | 8.8% |
Windsor and Maidenhead UA | 8,256 | 6.9% |
Wokingham UA | 8,408 | 6.1% |
Milton Keynes UA | 13,397 | 6.7% |
Brighton and Hove UA | 13,933 | 6.3% |
Portsmouth UA | 10,862 | 6.1% |
Southampton UA | 12,622 | 6.0% |
Isle of Wight UA | 10,614 | 8.5% |
Source: Yorkshire and Humber Public Health Observatory Diabetes Prevalence Model
Diagnosed diabetes prevalence across the four nations of the United Kingdom are taken from the Quality and Outcomes Framework (QOF) and represents all patients age 17 and older who have been diagnosed with diabetes and included on general practitioner registers.
In 2013/14, QOF showed that there were 3.3 million people aged 17 years and older with diagnosed diabetes with equals 6.2% of this age group. The break down by country can be found in the following table:
Diagnosed diabetes across the four nations of the United Kingdom -2013/14
Number | % | |
England | 2,814,004 | 6.2% |
Wales | 177,212 | 6.9% |
Scotland | 259,986 | 5.9% |
Northern Ireland | 81,867 | 5.3% |
United Kingdom | 3,333,069 | 6.2% |
Source: Quality and Outcomes Framework (Health and Social Care Information Centre)
Public Health England’s diabetes prevalence model estimates total diabetes prevalence for England and for all local authorities and clinical commissioning groups in England. The model reflects the prevalence of diabetes (diagnosed and undiagnosed) and adjusts for the age, sex, ethnic group and deprivation pattern of the local population.
The estimated total diabetes prevalence using the diabetes prevalence model is 7.5% in England in 2014.
Asked by: Keith Vaz (Labour - Leicester East)
Question to the Department of Health and Social Care:
To ask the Secretary of State for Health, what estimate he has made of the number of people (a) diagnosed and (b) currently undiagnosed with diabetes in (i) England, (ii) Wales, (iii) Scotland and (iv) Northern Ireland.
Answered by Jane Ellison
The information on estimates of people in each county who have diabetes is not available in the format requested. The table below shows the estimated number of people with diabetes for upper tier district authorities. The estimates ranges from 5.4% in the City of London, to 10.7% in Brent.
Estimated ranges of people with diabetes for upper tier district authorities for 2014
2014 | Number | Prevalence |
England | 3,279,925 | 7.5% |
Buckinghamshire CC | 28,986 | 7.1% |
Cambridgeshire CC | 35,215 | 6.7% |
Cumbria CC | 33,879 | 8.0% |
Derbyshire CC | 48,864 | 7.6% |
Devon CC | 52,629 | 8.1% |
Dorset CC | 30,060 | 8.7% |
East Sussex CC | 37,859 | 8.6% |
Essex CC | 87,202 | 7.2% |
Gloucestershire CC | 36,877 | 7.4% |
Hampshire CC | 77,073 | 7.1% |
Hertfordshire CC | 62,079 | 6.8% |
Kent CC | 90,195 | 7.5% |
Lancashire CC | 76,349 | 7.8% |
Leicestershire CC | 40,535 | 7.4% |
Lincolnshire CC | 48,338 | 8.0% |
Norfolk CC | 59,406 | 7.9% |
Northamptonshire CC | 41,475 | 7.1% |
North Yorkshire CC | 39,207 | 7.7% |
Nottinghamshire CC | 49,494 | 7.5% |
Oxfordshire CC | 35,376 | 6.6% |
Somerset CC | 36,052 | 8.0% |
Staffordshire CC | 52,956 | 7.6% |
Suffolk CC | 47,835 | 7.7% |
Surrey CC | 62,828 | 6.8% |
Warwickshire CC | 34,255 | 7.5% |
West Sussex CC | 52,761 | 7.8% |
Worcestershire CC | 36,287 | 7.8% |
City of London LB | 693 | 5.4% |
Barking and Dagenham LB | 9,942 | 7.5% |
Barnet LB | 23,493 | 8.2% |
Bexley LB | 13,716 | 7.3% |
Brent LB | 21,497 | 10.7% |
Bromley LB | 18,676 | 7.2% |
Camden LB | 12,758 | 6.1% |
Croydon LB | 23,737 | 8.5% |
Ealing LB | 22,765 | 8.8% |
Enfield LB | 19,233 | 8.2% |
Greenwich LB | 13,330 | 7.3% |
Hackney LB | 13,882 | 8.1% |
Hammersmith and Fulham LB | 9,120 | 6.5% |
Haringey LB | 14,316 | 7.7% |
Harrow LB | 18,567 | 9.6% |
Havering LB | 14,746 | 7.5% |
Hillingdon LB | 16,509 | 7.6% |
Hounslow LB | 16,311 | 8.3% |
Islington LB | 10,389 | 6.3% |
Kensington and Chelsea LB | 11,515 | 7.6% |
Kingston upon Thames LB | 9,119 | 6.2% |
Lambeth LB | 16,069 | 6.6% |
Lewisham LB | 15,799 | 7.1% |
Merton LB | 11,751 | 6.6% |
Newham LB | 17,950 | 10.1% |
Redbridge LB | 19,326 | 8.8% |
Richmond upon Thames LB | 10,345 | 6.3% |
Southwark LB | 16,709 | 6.5% |
Sutton LB | 11,149 | 6.9% |
Tower Hamlets LB | 14,360 | 7.2% |
Waltham Forest LB | 14,919 | 8.5% |
Wandsworth LB | 14,232 | 5.8% |
Westminster LB | 15,354 | 6.4% |
Bolton MD | 17,905 | 8.4% |
Bury MD | 11,054 | 7.5% |
Manchester MD | 27,051 | 6.5% |
Oldham MD | 14,368 | 8.4% |
Rochdale MD | 13,608 | 8.4% |
Salford MD | 13,212 | 6.9% |
Stockport MD | 17,225 | 7.4% |
Tameside MD | 14,001 | 7.9% |
Trafford MD | 12,732 | 7.2% |
Wigan MD | 18,785 | 7.4% |
Knowsley MD | 9,246 | 7.7% |
Liverpool MD | 26,281 | 7.1% |
St Helens MD | 11,119 | 7.6% |
Sefton MD | 17,851 | 8.0% |
Wirral MD | 19,508 | 7.9% |
Barnsley MD | 14,456 | 7.6% |
Doncaster MD | 18,782 | 7.9% |
Rotherham MD | 16,434 | 7.8% |
Sheffield MD | 33,060 | 7.0% |
Gateshead MD | 12,158 | 7.6% |
Newcastle upon Tyne MD | 16,034 | 6.6% |
North Tyneside MD | 12,242 | 7.3% |
South Tyneside MD | 9,982 | 7.8% |
Sunderland MD | 17,552 | 7.5% |
Birmingham MD | 72,576 | 8.8% |
Coventry MD | 20,609 | 7.9% |
Dudley MD | 20,361 | 8.0% |
Sandwell MD | 22,244 | 9.5% |
Solihull MD | 13,109 | 7.7% |
Walsall MD | 18,340 | 9.0% |
Wolverhampton MD | 19,090 | 9.8% |
Bradford MD | 35,136 | 8.5% |
Calderdale MD | 12,987 | 7.7% |
Kirklees MD | 27,064 | 8.1% |
Leeds MD | 45,596 | 6.5% |
Wakefield MD | 20,763 | 7.6% |
Hartlepool UA | 5,690 | 7.6% |
Middlesbrough UA | 8,791 | 7.7% |
Redcar and Cleveland UA | 9,121 | 8.1% |
Stockton-on-Tees UA | 11,330 | 7.1% |
Darlington UA | 6,314 | 7.6% |
County Durham UA | 32,455 | 7.6% |
Northumberland UA | 21,048 | 8.0% |
Cheshire East UA | 22,235 | 7.3% |
Halton UA | 7,168 | 7.5% |
Warrington UA | 11,560 | 7.0% |
Cheshire West and Chester UA | 19,617 | 7.2% |
Blackburn with Darwen UA | 9,525 | 8.9% |
Blackpool UA | 9,541 | 8.4% |
Kingston upon Hull UA | 15,411 | 6.8% |
East Riding of Yorkshire UA | 23,168 | 7.8% |
North East Lincolnshire UA | 9,927 | 7.7% |
North Lincolnshire UA | 10,872 | 7.9% |
York UA | 10,873 | 6.1% |
Derby UA | 15,433 | 7.5% |
Leicester UA | 24,459 | 9.5% |
Rutland UA | 2,379 | 7.5% |
Nottingham UA | 16,958 | 6.4% |
Herefordshire County UA | 12,831 | 8.4% |
Telford and Wrekin UA | 9,834 | 7.4% |
Shropshire UA | 19,867 | 8.0% |
Stoke-on-Trent UA | 15,358 | 7.9% |
Bath and North East Somerset UA | 9,907 | 6.4% |
Bristol UA | 23,189 | 5.9% |
North Somerset UA | 14,094 | 7.6% |
South Gloucestershire UA | 14,422 | 6.3% |
Cornwall UA | 37,893 | 8.1% |
Plymouth UA | 14,805 | 6.7% |
Torbay UA | 9,947 | 8.6% |
Bournemouth UA | 10,006 | 7.1% |
Poole UA | 9,052 | 7.6% |
Swindon UA | 11,443 | 6.7% |
Wiltshire UA | 27,724 | 7.2% |
Peterborough UA | 10,850 | 7.6% |
Luton UA | 12,685 | 8.2% |
Bedford UA | 10,228 | 7.7% |
Central Bedfordshire UA | 14,494 | 6.7% |
Southend-on-Sea UA | 10,646 | 7.7% |
Thurrock UA | 8,951 | 6.7% |
Medway UA | 14,548 | 7.0% |
Bracknell Forest UA | 5,833 | 6.1% |
West Berkshire UA | 8,445 | 6.7% |
Reading UA | 7,789 | 6.0% |
Slough UA | 9,181 | 8.8% |
Windsor and Maidenhead UA | 8,256 | 6.9% |
Wokingham UA | 8,408 | 6.1% |
Milton Keynes UA | 13,397 | 6.7% |
Brighton and Hove UA | 13,933 | 6.3% |
Portsmouth UA | 10,862 | 6.1% |
Southampton UA | 12,622 | 6.0% |
Isle of Wight UA | 10,614 | 8.5% |
Source: Yorkshire and Humber Public Health Observatory Diabetes Prevalence Model
Diagnosed diabetes prevalence across the four nations of the United Kingdom are taken from the Quality and Outcomes Framework (QOF) and represents all patients age 17 and older who have been diagnosed with diabetes and included on general practitioner registers.
In 2013/14, QOF showed that there were 3.3 million people aged 17 years and older with diagnosed diabetes with equals 6.2% of this age group. The break down by country can be found in the following table:
Diagnosed diabetes across the four nations of the United Kingdom -2013/14
Number | % | |
England | 2,814,004 | 6.2% |
Wales | 177,212 | 6.9% |
Scotland | 259,986 | 5.9% |
Northern Ireland | 81,867 | 5.3% |
United Kingdom | 3,333,069 | 6.2% |
Source: Quality and Outcomes Framework (Health and Social Care Information Centre)
Public Health England’s diabetes prevalence model estimates total diabetes prevalence for England and for all local authorities and clinical commissioning groups in England. The model reflects the prevalence of diabetes (diagnosed and undiagnosed) and adjusts for the age, sex, ethnic group and deprivation pattern of the local population.
The estimated total diabetes prevalence using the diabetes prevalence model is 7.5% in England in 2014.