Information between 2nd March 2024 - 11th April 2024
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
Division Votes |
---|
4 Mar 2024 - Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Bottomley of Nettlestone voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 161 Conservative No votes vs 4 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 274 Noes - 172 |
4 Mar 2024 - Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Bottomley of Nettlestone voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 162 Conservative No votes vs 4 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 258 Noes - 171 |
4 Mar 2024 - Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Bottomley of Nettlestone voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 157 Conservative No votes vs 4 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 277 Noes - 167 |
4 Mar 2024 - Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Bottomley of Nettlestone voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 160 Conservative No votes vs 4 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 260 Noes - 169 |
6 Mar 2024 - Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Bottomley of Nettlestone voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 160 Conservative No votes vs 3 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 246 Noes - 171 |
6 Mar 2024 - Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Bottomley of Nettlestone voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 164 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 228 Noes - 184 |
6 Mar 2024 - Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Bottomley of Nettlestone voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 155 Conservative No votes vs 3 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 244 Noes - 160 |
6 Mar 2024 - Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Bottomley of Nettlestone voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 167 Conservative No votes vs 4 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 278 Noes - 189 |
6 Mar 2024 - Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Bottomley of Nettlestone voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 165 Conservative No votes vs 2 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 265 Noes - 181 |
11 Mar 2024 - Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Bottomley of Nettlestone voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 180 Conservative No votes vs 4 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 209 Noes - 193 |
11 Mar 2024 - Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Bottomley of Nettlestone voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 178 Conservative No votes vs 3 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 204 Noes - 192 |
11 Mar 2024 - Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Bottomley of Nettlestone voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 178 Conservative No votes vs 2 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 199 Noes - 199 |
11 Mar 2024 - Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Bottomley of Nettlestone voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 180 Conservative No votes vs 5 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 217 Noes - 192 |
11 Mar 2024 - Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Bottomley of Nettlestone voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 175 Conservative No votes vs 4 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 202 Noes - 187 |
20 Mar 2024 - Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Bottomley of Nettlestone voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 205 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 263 Noes - 233 |
20 Mar 2024 - Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Bottomley of Nettlestone voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 203 Conservative No votes vs 1 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 276 Noes - 226 |
20 Mar 2024 - Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Bottomley of Nettlestone voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 208 Conservative No votes vs 1 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 285 Noes - 230 |
Speeches |
---|
Baroness Bottomley of Nettlestone speeches from: Cybersecurity and UK Democracy
Baroness Bottomley of Nettlestone contributed 1 speech (221 words) Tuesday 26th March 2024 - Lords Chamber Cabinet Office |
Written Answers |
---|
House of Lords Chamber: Bishops
Asked by: Baroness Bottomley of Nettlestone (Conservative - Life peer) Monday 25th March 2024 Question To ask the Senior Deputy Speaker what plans he has, if any, to review the requirements for the Lords Spiritual to wear robes in the Chamber at times other than when they are saying prayers. Answered by Lord Gardiner of Kimble Paragraph 4.15 of the Companion describes the robes of rochet and chimere that the Lords Spiritual wear in the Chamber. The Procedure and Privileges Committee has no plans to review this requirement. |
House of Lords: Bishops
Asked by: Baroness Bottomley of Nettlestone (Conservative - Life peer) Monday 25th March 2024 Question To ask the Senior Deputy Speaker whether the House of Lords funds the purchase and ongoing maintenance, including laundry, of robes worn by the Lords Spiritual. Answered by Lord Gardiner of Kimble The House does not fund the purchase or maintenance of the robes worn by the Lords Spiritual. |
Armed Forces: Families
Asked by: Baroness Bottomley of Nettlestone (Conservative - Life peer) Wednesday 3rd April 2024 Question to the Ministry of Defence: To ask His Majesty's Government what recent assessment they have made of the varied needs of the families of those serving in the armed forces; what steps they have taken to increase support available to those families; and to what extent they have addressed the recommendations outlined in the report commissioned by the Ministry of Defence, Living in our shoes: understanding the needs of UK Armed Forces Families published in June 2020. Answered by Earl of Minto - Minister of State (Ministry of Defence) Defence recognises the important role that families play in supporting our Armed Forces, which is why in 2022 we published our UK Armed Forces Families Strategy 2022 – 2032. There is much crossover between the Living in Our Shoes report and the Families Strategy Action Plan, with two authors of the report holding Defence to account via our Families Strategy Steering Group and progress being reported biannually to Ministers and being placed on record in the annual Armed Forces Covenant and Veterans Report.
The needs of families are constantly evolving, which is why Defence undertakes an annual Tri-Service Families Continuous Attitude Survey (FAMCAS). FAMCAS captures the key issues impacting our families which we then work to relieve. This may be achieved through direct intervention, for example via the Defence-funded Wraparound Childcare scheme, or by collaborating closely with other stakeholders or Government Departments, such as with the Office for Students to ensure that Service children are recognised within its Equality of Opportunity Risk Register. |