Information between 27th October 2025 - 6th December 2025
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
| Division Votes |
|---|
|
28 Oct 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Carberry of Muswell Hill voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 136 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 184 Noes - 195 |
|
28 Oct 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Carberry of Muswell Hill voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 135 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 240 Noes - 143 |
|
28 Oct 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Carberry of Muswell Hill voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 133 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 249 Noes - 142 |
|
28 Oct 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Carberry of Muswell Hill voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 146 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 267 Noes - 153 |
|
28 Oct 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Carberry of Muswell Hill voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 144 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 301 Noes - 153 |
|
28 Oct 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Carberry of Muswell Hill voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 144 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 302 Noes - 159 |
|
29 Oct 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Carberry of Muswell Hill voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 105 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 50 Noes - 115 |
|
29 Oct 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Carberry of Muswell Hill voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 110 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 52 Noes - 113 |
|
29 Oct 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Carberry of Muswell Hill voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 122 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 133 Noes - 188 |
|
29 Oct 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Carberry of Muswell Hill voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 118 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 97 Noes - 128 |
|
29 Oct 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Carberry of Muswell Hill voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 130 Labour No votes vs 2 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 260 Noes - 141 |
|
27 Oct 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Carberry of Muswell Hill voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 146 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 84 Noes - 185 |
|
5 Nov 2025 - Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Carberry of Muswell Hill voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 123 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 161 Noes - 144 |
|
5 Nov 2025 - Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Carberry of Muswell Hill voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 130 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 61 Noes - 140 |
|
5 Nov 2025 - Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Carberry of Muswell Hill voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 129 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 66 Noes - 151 |
|
5 Nov 2025 - Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Carberry of Muswell Hill voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 126 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 157 Noes - 200 |
|
5 Nov 2025 - Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Carberry of Muswell Hill voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 120 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 159 Noes - 194 |
|
3 Nov 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Carberry of Muswell Hill voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 138 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 162 Noes - 178 |
|
3 Nov 2025 - Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Carberry of Muswell Hill voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 146 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 182 Noes - 227 |
|
3 Nov 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Carberry of Muswell Hill voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 135 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 72 Noes - 147 |
|
3 Nov 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Carberry of Muswell Hill voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 123 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 58 Noes - 125 |
|
3 Nov 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Carberry of Muswell Hill voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 133 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 107 Noes - 136 |
|
11 Nov 2025 - Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Carberry of Muswell Hill voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 152 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 68 Noes - 169 |
|
11 Nov 2025 - Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Carberry of Muswell Hill voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 150 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 201 Noes - 238 |
|
11 Nov 2025 - Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Carberry of Muswell Hill voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 147 Labour No votes vs 3 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 89 Noes - 195 |
|
11 Nov 2025 - Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Carberry of Muswell Hill voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 153 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 207 Noes - 240 |
|
11 Nov 2025 - Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Carberry of Muswell Hill voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 151 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 66 Noes - 175 |
|
11 Nov 2025 - Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Carberry of Muswell Hill voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 153 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 193 Noes - 236 |
|
17 Nov 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Carberry of Muswell Hill voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 134 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 295 Noes - 150 |
|
17 Nov 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Carberry of Muswell Hill voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 141 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 298 Noes - 157 |
|
17 Nov 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Carberry of Muswell Hill voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 135 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 309 Noes - 150 |
|
17 Nov 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Carberry of Muswell Hill voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 133 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 296 Noes - 147 |
|
17 Nov 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Carberry of Muswell Hill voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 127 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 302 Noes - 135 |
|
24 Nov 2025 - Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Carberry of Muswell Hill voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 143 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 200 Noes - 244 |
| Speeches |
|---|
|
Baroness Carberry of Muswell Hill speeches from: Autumn Budget 2025
Baroness Carberry of Muswell Hill contributed 1 speech (505 words) Thursday 4th December 2025 - Lords Chamber HM Treasury |
|
Baroness Carberry of Muswell Hill speeches from: Accidental Prison Releases
Baroness Carberry of Muswell Hill contributed 1 speech (27 words) Monday 10th November 2025 - Lords Chamber Ministry of Justice |
|
Baroness Carberry of Muswell Hill speeches from: Tobacco and Vapes Bill
Baroness Carberry of Muswell Hill contributed 1 speech (356 words) Committee stage Thursday 30th October 2025 - Grand Committee Department of Health and Social Care |
|
Baroness Carberry of Muswell Hill speeches from: Tobacco and Vapes Bill
Baroness Carberry of Muswell Hill contributed 1 speech (460 words) Committee stage Monday 27th October 2025 - Grand Committee Department of Health and Social Care |
| Written Answers |
|---|
|
Labour Force Survey
Asked by: Baroness Carberry of Muswell Hill (Labour - Life peer) Wednesday 29th October 2025 Question to the Cabinet Office: To ask His Majesty's Government what steps they have taken to improve the coverage, accuracy and reliability of the Labour Force Survey, and what progress they have made in those improvements. Answered by Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent - Baroness in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip) The information requested falls under the remit of the UK Statistics Authority.
Please see the letter attached from the National Statistician and Chief Executive of the UK Statistics Authority.
The Baroness Carberry of Muswell Hill House of Lords London SW1A 0PW 22 October 2025 Dear Baroness Carberry of Muswell Hill,
As Permanent Secretary of the Office for National Statistics (ONS), I am responding to your Parliamentary Question asking what steps the ONS have taken to improve the coverage, accuracy and reliability of the Labour Force Survey (LFS), and what progress the ONS have made in those improvements (HL11013).
Our recently published plans for economic statistics and survey improvement and enhancement reinforce the importance of, and our commitment to, delivering high-quality labour market statistics.
The LFS remains the lead measure for data on the supply of labour while further development of the Transformed Labour Force Survey (TLFS) takes place.
Over the last two years, we have taken several actions to address quality concerns with the LFS. These include:
These interventions have now fed through all five waves of the survey. Response levels and rates have shown clear improvement because of these actions, with Wave 1 response levels now very close to their pre-coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic level. The composition of respondents according to different characteristics has also shown some improvement since late 2023; however, representativeness is lower than before the pandemic and has not improved for all characteristics. These improvements have been welcomed by the Stakeholder Advisory Panel on Labour Market Statistics, as they increase confidence that the LFS can be fit for purpose until the transition to the TLFS takes place. We are increasing interviewer capacity for Waves 2 to 5 to further improve response rates, as these currently remain lower than their pre-pandemic level. We continue to closely monitor LFS data quality and regularly update users as part of our LFS quality articles, which assess the impact of recent changes on the statistics, response levels and rates, and respondent characteristics.
In parallel to these LFS improvements, progress with the TLFS continues. The short Core Survey (a streamlined, longitudinal, labour-market-focused questionnaire that takes 15 minutes per household to complete on average) launched in July 2025, with a Wave 1 sample size of 90,000 households per quarter across Great Britain. The new TLFS design is expected to reduce respondent burden, improve completion rates and representativeness, and enhance the overall data quality of the headline labour market indicators.
We continue to keep users informed of progress with the transformation of our labour market statistics through our quarterly Labour Market Transformation articles, with the next update scheduled for November 2025. We would be happy to send you a copy when published.
Yours sincerely, Darren Tierney 3. https://www.ons.gov.uk/employmentandlabourmarket/peopleinwork/employmentandemployeetypes/articles/labourforcesurveyqualityupdate/september2025 |
| Live Transcript |
|---|
|
Note: Cited speaker in live transcript data may not always be accurate. Check video link to confirm. |
|
4 Dec 2025, 6:02 p.m. - House of Lords "my noble friend Baroness Carberry of Muswell Hill said, for small and medium sized businesses, the budget supports high streets with " Lord Livermore, The Financial Secretary to the Treasury (Labour) - View Video - View Transcript |