Information between 2nd February 2026 - 12th February 2026
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
| Calendar |
|---|
|
Thursday 5th February 2026 Baroness Chapman of Darlington (Labour - Life peer) Urgent Question Repeat - Main Chamber Subject: Situation in Iran View calendar - Add to calendar |
| Division Votes |
|---|
|
3 Feb 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Chapman of Darlington voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 131 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 36 Noes - 144 |
|
3 Feb 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Chapman of Darlington voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 125 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 176 Noes - 132 |
|
3 Feb 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Chapman of Darlington voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 131 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 178 Noes - 140 |
|
3 Feb 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Chapman of Darlington voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 166 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 295 Noes - 180 |
|
4 Feb 2026 - Public Order Act 2023 (Interference With Use or Operation of Key National Infrastructure) Regulations 2025 - View Vote Context Baroness Chapman of Darlington voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 165 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 62 Noes - 295 |
|
10 Feb 2026 - Sustainable Aviation Fuel Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Chapman of Darlington voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 173 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 186 Noes - 251 |
|
10 Feb 2026 - Sustainable Aviation Fuel Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Chapman of Darlington voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 169 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 188 Noes - 258 |
| Speeches |
|---|
|
Baroness Chapman of Darlington speeches from: Ambassadors: Vetting Process
Baroness Chapman of Darlington contributed 10 speeches (902 words) Tuesday 10th February 2026 - Lords Chamber |
|
Baroness Chapman of Darlington speeches from: Jimmy Lai: Prison Sentence
Baroness Chapman of Darlington contributed 15 speeches (1,030 words) Monday 9th February 2026 - Lords Chamber |
|
Baroness Chapman of Darlington speeches from: Iran
Baroness Chapman of Darlington contributed 6 speeches (703 words) Thursday 5th February 2026 - Lords Chamber |
|
Baroness Chapman of Darlington speeches from: China: Jimmy Lai
Baroness Chapman of Darlington contributed 7 speeches (518 words) Monday 2nd February 2026 - Lords Chamber |
|
Baroness Chapman of Darlington speeches from: China: Human Rights and UK National Security
Baroness Chapman of Darlington contributed 10 speeches (1,068 words) Monday 2nd February 2026 - Lords Chamber |
| Live Transcript |
|---|
|
Note: Cited speaker in live transcript data may not always be accurate. Check video link to confirm. |
|
5 Feb 2026, 4:45 p.m. - House of Lords "Baroness Chapman of Darlington from the Foreign and Commonwealth Office. I felt at the end of our conversation that she had become " Lord Hanson of Flint, The Minister of State, Home Department (Labour) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
11 Feb 2026, 7:57 p.m. - House of Lords "and the Minister of State, the noble Baroness Chapman of Darlington, stated in a debate which was initiated in this House recently. And I quote, My Lords, " Lord Moynihan (Conservative) - View Video - View Transcript |
| Parliamentary Debates |
|---|
|
Biodiversity Beyond National Jurisdiction Bill
30 speeches (5,364 words) Consideration of Lords amendments Monday 2nd February 2026 - Commons Chamber Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office Mentions: 1: Seema Malhotra (LAB - Feltham and Heston) I also place on the record my thanks to Baroness Chapman of Darlington for leading the Bill expertly - Link to Speech |
| Written Answers |
|---|
|
Jimmy Lai
Asked by: Lord Alton of Liverpool (Crossbench - Life peer) Tuesday 10th February 2026 Question to the Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office: To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Baroness Chapman of Darlington on 21 January (HL13311), whether they have formally lodged a statement at the United Nations and with China about a breach of the Sino-British Joint Declaration in the case of Jimmy Lai; and if not, whether they intend to do so. Answered by Baroness Chapman of Darlington - Minister of State (Development) Following Beijing's imposition of the National Security Law (NSL) on Hong Kong, the UK declared China to be in a state of ongoing non-compliance with the Joint Declaration. The UK raised concerns about the NSL and Joint Declaration during the 2020 UN Human Rights Council sessions. This government has repeatedly called for China to return to its commitments under the Joint Declaration, for the NSL to be repealed, and for an end to the prosecution of all individuals charged under it, including British national Jimmy Lai. |
|
UK Relations with EU: Women
Asked by: Baroness Finn (Conservative - Life peer) Friday 6th February 2026 Question to the Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office: To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answers by Baroness Chapman of Darlington on 17 September 2025 (HL10206) and 23 September 2025 (HL10204), what definition of a woman they use when engaging in joint UK-EU programmes relating to women; whether it differs from the self-identification policy adopted by the European Institute for Gender Equality; and whether they plan to change the UK definition in light of the Supreme Court ruling in For Women Scotland Ltd v The Scottish Ministers. Answered by Baroness Chapman of Darlington - Minister of State (Development) The Supreme Court decision concerned the definition of a woman in the context of the UK Equality Act 2010. If the Noble Baroness wishes to specify the UK-EU programmes that she has in mind, I will be happy to examine whether her question arises in relation to those programmes. |