Baroness Lister of Burtersett Alert Sample


Alert Sample

View the Parallel Parliament page for Baroness Lister of Burtersett

Information between 15th October 2025 - 25th October 2025

Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.


Division Votes
15 Oct 2025 - Public Authorities (Fraud, Error and Recovery) Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Lister of Burtersett voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 136 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 139 Noes - 186
15 Oct 2025 - Public Authorities (Fraud, Error and Recovery) Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Lister of Burtersett voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 128 Labour No votes vs 2 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 200 Noes - 194
20 Oct 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Lister of Burtersett voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 136 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 235 Noes - 164
20 Oct 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Lister of Burtersett voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 139 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 61 Noes - 154
20 Oct 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Lister of Burtersett voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 142 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 227 Noes - 168
20 Oct 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Lister of Burtersett voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 141 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 216 Noes - 175
21 Oct 2025 - Public Authorities (Fraud, Error and Recovery) Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Lister of Burtersett voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 145 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 262 Noes - 157
21 Oct 2025 - Public Authorities (Fraud, Error and Recovery) Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Lister of Burtersett voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 146 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 270 Noes - 160
21 Oct 2025 - Public Authorities (Fraud, Error and Recovery) Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Lister of Burtersett voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 131 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 138 Noes - 138
21 Oct 2025 - Public Authorities (Fraud, Error and Recovery) Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Lister of Burtersett voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 142 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 253 Noes - 153
22 Oct 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Lister of Burtersett voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 111 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 173 Noes - 120
22 Oct 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Lister of Burtersett voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 148 Labour Aye votes vs 1 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 163 Noes - 236
22 Oct 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Lister of Burtersett voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 148 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 246 Noes - 169
22 Oct 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Lister of Burtersett voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 105 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 84 Noes - 113
22 Oct 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Lister of Burtersett voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 105 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 83 Noes - 113
22 Oct 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Lister of Burtersett voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 102 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 228 Noes - 113


Speeches
Baroness Lister of Burtersett speeches from: Deprivation of Citizenship Orders (Effect during Appeal) Bill
Baroness Lister of Burtersett contributed 1 speech (63 words)
Report stage
Tuesday 21st October 2025 - Lords Chamber
Home Office
Baroness Lister of Burtersett speeches from: Public Authorities (Fraud, Error and Recovery) Bill
Baroness Lister of Burtersett contributed 1 speech (444 words)
Report stage part two
Tuesday 21st October 2025 - Lords Chamber
Department for Work and Pensions


Written Answers
Israel: Overseas Trade
Asked by: Baroness Lister of Burtersett (Labour - Life peer)
Thursday 16th October 2025

Question to the Department for Business and Trade:

To ask His Majesty's Government whether they have considered reversing the burden of proof to require Israeli exporters to demonstrate their goods are not produced in illegal settlements before being imported into the UK.

Answered by Lord Stockwood - Minister of State (HM Treasury)

The UK Government has a clear position that Israeli settlements in Palestine are illegal under international law. The UK Government encourages accurate labelling of goods in order to avoid misleading consumers and promote transparency, including those goods produced in illegal settlements in Palestine. Goods produced in these settlements are not entitled to benefit from preferential tariff treatment under the UK’s current trade agreements with the Palestinian Authority and Israel. Where there are doubts about the declared origin of goods, HMRC undertakes checks to verify the origin and ensure fiscal compliance.

It is a long-standing position that preferential treatment will be refused to Israeli goods if the production conferring originating status has taken place in a location within Palestine brought under Israeli administration since June 1967. A 2004 technical arrangement, rolled over from the EU, requires that the city, village or industrial zone and postcode where production conferring originating status has taken place appear on all proofs of preferential origin issued or made out in Israel. A change in policy to this long-standing requirement is not currently under consideration.

Refugees: Temporary Accommodation
Asked by: Baroness Lister of Burtersett (Labour - Life peer)
Monday 20th October 2025

Question to the Home Office:

To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the remarks by Lord Hanson of Flinton 4 September (HL Deb col. 918), what is their estimate of the proportion of newly recognised refugees who are single applicants and of working age.

Answered by Lord Hanson of Flint - Minister of State (Home Office)

The Home Office publishes data on grants of protection and other leave by age at initial decision in table Asy_D02 of the 'Immigration System Statistics Quarterly Release' on GOV.UK. The latest data relates to the year ending June 2025.

In the year ending June 2025, 80% (41,574 people) of grants of protection and other leave at initial decision were to people aged between 18 and 69.

A breakdown by single applicant or family group is not available from published statistics, and the relevant data could only be collated and verified for the purpose of answering this question at disproportionate cost.

Israeli Settlements: Investment and Overseas Trade
Asked by: Baroness Lister of Burtersett (Labour - Life peer)
Tuesday 21st October 2025

Question to the Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office:

To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the advisory opinion by the International Court of Justice published on 24 July 2024, what steps, if any, they are taking to prevent trade or investment relations that "assist in the maintenance of the illegal situation created by Israel in Palestine".

Answered by Baroness Chapman of Darlington - Minister of State (Development)

There is already guidance on gov.uk setting out the clear risks related to economic and financial activities in the settlements, and we do not encourage or offer support to such activity. Goods originating from illegal Israeli settlements are not entitled to tariff and trade preferences under either the existing agreement between the UK and Israel or in our agreement with the Palestinian Authority.