Baroness Lister of Burtersett Alert Sample


Alert Sample

View the Parallel Parliament page for Baroness Lister of Burtersett

Information between 31st January 2026 - 20th February 2026

Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.


Division Votes
3 Feb 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Lister of Burtersett voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 131 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 178 Noes - 140
3 Feb 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Lister of Burtersett voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 131 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 36 Noes - 144
3 Feb 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Lister of Burtersett voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 125 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 176 Noes - 132
3 Feb 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Lister of Burtersett voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 166 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 295 Noes - 180
4 Feb 2026 - Public Order Act 2023 (Interference With Use or Operation of Key National Infrastructure) Regulations 2025 - View Vote Context
Baroness Lister of Burtersett voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 165 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 62 Noes - 295
10 Feb 2026 - Sustainable Aviation Fuel Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Lister of Burtersett voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 169 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 188 Noes - 258
10 Feb 2026 - Sustainable Aviation Fuel Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Lister of Burtersett voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 173 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 186 Noes - 251


Speeches
Baroness Lister of Burtersett speeches from: Social Security Benefits Up-rating Order 2026
Baroness Lister of Burtersett contributed 1 speech (1,349 words)
Tuesday 10th February 2026 - Grand Committee
Department for Work and Pensions
Baroness Lister of Burtersett speeches from: Two-child Benefit Cap: Foreign-born Children
Baroness Lister of Burtersett contributed 1 speech (66 words)
Tuesday 3rd February 2026 - Lords Chamber
Department for Work and Pensions
Baroness Lister of Burtersett speeches from: Child Poverty: Faith-based and Voluntary Sector Organisations
Baroness Lister of Burtersett contributed 1 speech (64 words)
Tuesday 3rd February 2026 - Lords Chamber
Department for Work and Pensions
Baroness Lister of Burtersett speeches from: Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill
Baroness Lister of Burtersett contributed 1 speech (188 words)
Tuesday 3rd February 2026 - Lords Chamber
Department for Work and Pensions
Baroness Lister of Burtersett speeches from: Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill
Baroness Lister of Burtersett contributed 4 speeches (1,581 words)
Tuesday 3rd February 2026 - Lords Chamber
Department for Work and Pensions


Written Answers
Debt Respite Scheme
Asked by: Baroness Lister of Burtersett (Labour - Life peer)
Tuesday 10th February 2026

Question to the HM Treasury:

To ask His Majesty's Government what plans they have (1) to set out a timeline for the review of the Breathing Space scheme required by May 2026, and (2) to consult with debt advice providers such as Citizens Advice as part of that review.

Answered by Lord Livermore - Financial Secretary (HM Treasury)

The Breathing Space scheme allows those in problem debt the space to engage with professional debt advice by providing a temporary relief from creditor enforcement action. Given the link between mental health and problem debt, the scheme also offers a separate entry route for eligible individuals receiving treatment for a mental health crisis.

As is standard for schemes of this nature, HM Treasury will carry out a five-year post implementation review of the scheme to consider its objectives and impact. More widely, the Government monitors the scheme’s operation to ensure it remains an effective tool for individuals and has regular engagement with debt advice providers as part of this.

Social Services: Migrant Workers
Asked by: Baroness Lister of Burtersett (Labour - Life peer)
Tuesday 17th February 2026

Question to the Home Office:

To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the impact on nursing staff working in the adult social care sector of proposals to change the qualifying period for indefinite leave to remain.

Answered by Lord Hanson of Flint - Minister of State (Home Office)

The earned settlement model, proposed in ‘A Fairer Pathway to Settlement’, announced changes to the mandatory requirements and qualifying period for indefinite leave to remain. It is currently subject to a public consultation, running until 12 February 2026.

As part of this consultation, we are seeking views on the potential impact of the proposed changes on different groups, including those working in sectors such as social care. Details of the earned settlement model will be finalised following that consultation.

The final proposals will also be subject to full economic and equality impact assessments, which we have committed to publish in due course.

Undocumented Migrants: France
Asked by: Baroness Lister of Burtersett (Labour - Life peer)
Tuesday 17th February 2026

Question to the Home Office:

To ask His Majesty's Government how many people have been returned to France under the 'one in, one out' scheme; of these, how many were age-disputed persons; and how many of those selected for the scheme were age-disputed persons and have not been returned as a result of their age dispute.

Answered by Lord Hanson of Flint - Minister of State (Home Office)

As of 3rd February, 305 people have been returned to France.

Removing minors to France is explicitly prohibited under Article 4(2)(d) of the Agreement.

Individuals are not removed to France where their age is in dispute, given the terms of the Treaty sets out that those removed will be individuals who have been determined to be an adult. We have recently seen several cases where migrants in this country are claiming to be children to prevent their removal. This can happen despite their having claimed to be an adult upon arrival in the country.

Operational details of the scheme are not disclosed outside of what has already been published as this may impact migrant behaviour or be exploited by organised crime gangs.