Information between 15th January 2026 - 4th February 2026
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
| Division Votes |
|---|
|
14 Jan 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Lister of Burtersett voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 123 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 59 Noes - 127 |
|
14 Jan 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Lister of Burtersett voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 162 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 278 Noes - 176 |
|
14 Jan 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Lister of Burtersett voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 152 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 213 Noes - 211 |
|
19 Jan 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Lister of Burtersett voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 154 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 216 Noes - 161 |
|
19 Jan 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Lister of Burtersett voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 156 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 235 Noes - 164 |
|
19 Jan 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Lister of Burtersett voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 149 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 159 Noes - 153 |
|
19 Jan 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Lister of Burtersett voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 155 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 232 Noes - 160 |
|
19 Jan 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Lister of Burtersett voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 151 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 148 Noes - 156 |
|
21 Jan 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Lister of Burtersett voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 114 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 53 Noes - 116 |
|
21 Jan 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Lister of Burtersett voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 134 Labour No votes vs 3 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 261 Noes - 150 |
|
21 Jan 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Lister of Burtersett voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 139 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 65 Noes - 162 |
|
21 Jan 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Lister of Burtersett voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 140 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 207 Noes - 159 |
|
28 Jan 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Lister of Burtersett voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 88 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 16 Noes - 92 |
|
28 Jan 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Lister of Burtersett voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 140 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 231 Noes - 147 |
|
28 Jan 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Lister of Burtersett voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 156 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 255 Noes - 183 |
|
28 Jan 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Lister of Burtersett voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 151 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 67 Noes - 191 |
| Speeches |
|---|
|
Baroness Lister of Burtersett speeches from: Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill
Baroness Lister of Burtersett contributed 1 speech (118 words) Wednesday 28th January 2026 - Lords Chamber Department for Work and Pensions |
|
Baroness Lister of Burtersett speeches from: Asylum and Immigration: Children
Baroness Lister of Burtersett contributed 3 speeches (286 words) Tuesday 27th January 2026 - Lords Chamber Home Office |
|
Baroness Lister of Burtersett speeches from: Violence Against Women and Girls Strategy
Baroness Lister of Burtersett contributed 1 speech (92 words) Wednesday 21st January 2026 - Lords Chamber Scotland Office |
|
Baroness Lister of Burtersett speeches from: Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill
Baroness Lister of Burtersett contributed 1 speech (451 words) Monday 19th January 2026 - Lords Chamber Department for Work and Pensions |
|
Baroness Lister of Burtersett speeches from: Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill
Baroness Lister of Burtersett contributed 1 speech (421 words) Wednesday 14th January 2026 - Lords Chamber Department for Work and Pensions |
| Written Answers |
|---|
|
Asylum: Employment
Asked by: Baroness Lister of Burtersett (Labour - Life peer) Monday 19th January 2026 Question to the Home Office: To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Lord Hanson of Flint on 2 January (HL12929), whether they plan to allow asylum seekers who are awaiting a decision after 12 months to apply for any job, including those not contained in the immigration salary list and the shortage occupation list. Answered by Lord Hanson of Flint - Minister of State (Home Office) Under the current system, permission to work for asylum seekers remains restricted to applying for roles on the Immigration Salary List, to protect the integrity of the asylum system and avoid creating incentives for irregular migration. Asylum seekers can undertake volunteering activities in charitable or public sector organisations, so long as it does not amount to unpaid work. |
|
Deportation: France
Asked by: Baroness Lister of Burtersett (Labour - Life peer) Wednesday 21st January 2026 Question to the Home Office: To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Lord Hanson of Flint on 22 December 2025 (HL12809), what criteria they are using to select specific individuals out of those eligible for removal to France under the 'one-in, one-out' scheme. Answered by Lord Hanson of Flint - Minister of State (Home Office) The pilot was agreed with both France and the European Commission in order to ensure it is compliant with domestic, European and International law. Eligibility criteria are set out in the Agreement. The pilot operates within existing legal frameworks and policies. All individuals will have their cases reviewed regularly in line with standard policies and guidance, and this includes both while detained and if any claims of being a victim of torture or of human trafficking and modern slavery are raised. Decisions on continuing suitability for detention are made on a case-by-case basis. Detained individuals are advised of their right to legal representation, and how they can obtain such representation, within 24 hours of their arrival at an Immigration Removal Centre (IRC). Ahead of pilot launch and throughout its duration, the Home Office has engaged with officials from the Ministry of Justice and the judiciary to ensure individuals have access to justice. The Home Office continues to engage with a wide range of NGOs and other external stakeholders. |
|
Deportation: France
Asked by: Baroness Lister of Burtersett (Labour - Life peer) Wednesday 21st January 2026 Question to the Home Office: To ask His Majesty's Government whether they have consulted non-governmental organisations, immigration lawyers and legal aid experts about whether people facing removal under the 'one in, one out' scheme have sufficient time to access legal representation or challenge removal decisions. Answered by Lord Hanson of Flint - Minister of State (Home Office) The pilot was agreed with both France and the European Commission in order to ensure it is compliant with domestic, European and International law. Eligibility criteria are set out in the Agreement. The pilot operates within existing legal frameworks and policies. All individuals will have their cases reviewed regularly in line with standard policies and guidance, and this includes both while detained and if any claims of being a victim of torture or of human trafficking and modern slavery are raised. Decisions on continuing suitability for detention are made on a case-by-case basis. Detained individuals are advised of their right to legal representation, and how they can obtain such representation, within 24 hours of their arrival at an Immigration Removal Centre (IRC). Ahead of pilot launch and throughout its duration, the Home Office has engaged with officials from the Ministry of Justice and the judiciary to ensure individuals have access to justice. The Home Office continues to engage with a wide range of NGOs and other external stakeholders. |
|
Deportation: France
Asked by: Baroness Lister of Burtersett (Labour - Life peer) Wednesday 21st January 2026 Question to the Home Office: To ask His Majesty's Government what support is offered to potential victims of torture, trafficking or modern slavery who may face removal under the 'one in, one out' scheme. Answered by Lord Hanson of Flint - Minister of State (Home Office) The pilot was agreed with both France and the European Commission in order to ensure it is compliant with domestic, European and International law. Eligibility criteria are set out in the Agreement. The pilot operates within existing legal frameworks and policies. All individuals will have their cases reviewed regularly in line with standard policies and guidance, and this includes both while detained and if any claims of being a victim of torture or of human trafficking and modern slavery are raised. Decisions on continuing suitability for detention are made on a case-by-case basis. Detained individuals are advised of their right to legal representation, and how they can obtain such representation, within 24 hours of their arrival at an Immigration Removal Centre (IRC). Ahead of pilot launch and throughout its duration, the Home Office has engaged with officials from the Ministry of Justice and the judiciary to ensure individuals have access to justice. The Home Office continues to engage with a wide range of NGOs and other external stakeholders. |
|
Refugees: Resettlement
Asked by: Baroness Lister of Burtersett (Labour - Life peer) Tuesday 27th January 2026 Question to the Home Office: To ask His Majesty's Government how many refugees they expect to be resettled in the UK through the UK Resettlement Scheme in 2026. Answered by Lord Hanson of Flint - Minister of State (Home Office) The UK has a proud history of providing protection and we continue to welcome refugees and people in need through our safe and legal routes. As announced in Restoring Order and Control, we are developing new capped sponsored refugee pathways. These will include education, labour and community routes. This transformative change to safe and legal routes will revolutionise the way in which we offer opportunities to refugees. The Home Office is working with partners, including local authorities, to design and operationalise these routes. As part of the fundamental change to the UK’s protection offer, the annual cap will be set in consultation with local authorities, partners, and community sponsors. The approach will reflect community capacity to welcome and support refugees. The number of refugees resettled through the UKRS in any given year will depend on a range of factors, including the capacity of local authorities to welcome, accommodate and integrate refugees. |
|
Refugees: Housing
Asked by: Baroness Lister of Burtersett (Labour - Life peer) Tuesday 27th January 2026 Question to the Home Office: To ask His Majesty's Government whether they intend to consult local authorities when setting the cap for refugee arrivals through safe and legal routes. Answered by Lord Hanson of Flint - Minister of State (Home Office) The UK has a proud history of providing protection and we continue to welcome refugees and people in need through our safe and legal routes. As announced in Restoring Order and Control, we are developing new capped sponsored refugee pathways. These will include education, labour and community routes. This transformative change to safe and legal routes will revolutionise the way in which we offer opportunities to refugees. The Home Office is working with partners, including local authorities, to design and operationalise these routes. As part of the fundamental change to the UK’s protection offer, the annual cap will be set in consultation with local authorities, partners, and community sponsors. The approach will reflect community capacity to welcome and support refugees. The number of refugees resettled through the UKRS in any given year will depend on a range of factors, including the capacity of local authorities to welcome, accommodate and integrate refugees. |
| Live Transcript |
|---|
|
Note: Cited speaker in live transcript data may not always be accurate. Check video link to confirm. |
|
27 Jan 2026, 2:42 p.m. - House of Lords " Second, Oral Question Baroness Lister of Burtersett. Lister of Burtersett. >> I beg leave to ask the question. Standing in my name on the Order Paper. " Lord Hanson of Flint, The Minister of State, Home Department (Labour) - View Video - View Transcript |