Information between 3rd November 2025 - 3rd December 2025
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
| Division Votes |
|---|
|
5 Nov 2025 - Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Lister of Burtersett voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 128 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 85 Noes - 169 |
|
5 Nov 2025 - Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Lister of Burtersett voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House One of 14 Labour Aye votes vs 88 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 47 Noes - 136 |
|
5 Nov 2025 - Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Lister of Burtersett voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 120 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 159 Noes - 194 |
|
5 Nov 2025 - Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Lister of Burtersett voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 129 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 66 Noes - 151 |
|
5 Nov 2025 - Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Lister of Burtersett voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 126 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 157 Noes - 200 |
|
5 Nov 2025 - Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Lister of Burtersett voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 123 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 161 Noes - 144 |
|
5 Nov 2025 - Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Lister of Burtersett voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 114 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 64 Noes - 116 |
|
3 Nov 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Lister of Burtersett voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 138 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 162 Noes - 178 |
|
3 Nov 2025 - Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Lister of Burtersett voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 146 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 182 Noes - 227 |
|
3 Nov 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Lister of Burtersett voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 135 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 72 Noes - 147 |
|
3 Nov 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Lister of Burtersett voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 123 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 58 Noes - 125 |
|
3 Nov 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Lister of Burtersett voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 133 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 107 Noes - 136 |
|
11 Nov 2025 - Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Lister of Burtersett voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 152 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 68 Noes - 169 |
|
11 Nov 2025 - Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Lister of Burtersett voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House One of 3 Labour Aye votes vs 147 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 89 Noes - 195 |
|
11 Nov 2025 - Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Lister of Burtersett voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 151 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 66 Noes - 175 |
|
11 Nov 2025 - Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Lister of Burtersett voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 150 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 201 Noes - 238 |
|
11 Nov 2025 - Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Lister of Burtersett voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 153 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 207 Noes - 240 |
|
11 Nov 2025 - Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Lister of Burtersett voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 153 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 193 Noes - 236 |
|
17 Nov 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Lister of Burtersett voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 141 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 298 Noes - 157 |
|
17 Nov 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Lister of Burtersett voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 135 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 309 Noes - 150 |
|
17 Nov 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Lister of Burtersett voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 133 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 296 Noes - 147 |
|
17 Nov 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Lister of Burtersett voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 134 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 295 Noes - 150 |
|
17 Nov 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Lister of Burtersett voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 127 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 302 Noes - 135 |
|
24 Nov 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Lister of Burtersett voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 125 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 81 Noes - 132 |
|
24 Nov 2025 - Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Lister of Burtersett voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 143 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 200 Noes - 244 |
| Speeches |
|---|
|
Baroness Lister of Burtersett speeches from: Carer’s Allowance: Overpayments Review
Baroness Lister of Burtersett contributed 1 speech (51 words) Tuesday 18th November 2025 - Lords Chamber Department for Work and Pensions |
|
Baroness Lister of Burtersett speeches from: Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill
Baroness Lister of Burtersett contributed 1 speech (406 words) Report stage: Part 1 Tuesday 11th November 2025 - Lords Chamber Home Office |
|
Baroness Lister of Burtersett speeches from: Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill
Baroness Lister of Burtersett contributed 5 speeches (2,274 words) Report stage Wednesday 5th November 2025 - Lords Chamber Home Office |
|
Baroness Lister of Burtersett speeches from: Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill
Baroness Lister of Burtersett contributed 4 speeches (990 words) Report stage Monday 3rd November 2025 - Lords Chamber Home Office |
| Written Answers |
|---|
|
Citizenship: Teachers
Asked by: Baroness Lister of Burtersett (Labour - Life peer) Tuesday 4th November 2025 Question to the Department for Education: To ask His Majesty's Government what steps they are taking to ensure that specialist citizenship teachers are recruited and retained, and whether they will extend bursaries to that subject in line with other shortage areas. Answered by Baroness Smith of Malvern - Minister of State (Department for Work and Pensions) Recruiting and retaining expert teachers is critical to the government’s mission to break down the barriers to opportunity for every child and delivery is already under way. The government agreed a 5.5% pay award for 2024/25 and a 4% pay award for 2025/26, meaning teachers and leaders will see an increase of almost 10% over two years. We are already seeing improvement. The workforce has grown by 2,346 full time equivalent between 2023/24 and 2024/25, and this year has one of the lowest leaver rates since 2010. Recruitment to citizenship initial teacher training (ITT) courses is unrestricted, allowing ITT providers and schools to recruit the specialist citizenship teachers they need. Citizenship trainee teachers are eligible for a tuition fee loan, maintenance loan and additional funding depending on individual circumstances, such as the Childcare Grant. The department reviews bursaries annually before announcing the offer for those applying for ITT courses to ensure bursaries are focused on subjects experiencing teacher shortages. |
|
Citizenship: Education
Asked by: Baroness Lister of Burtersett (Labour - Life peer) Tuesday 4th November 2025 Question to the Department for Education: To ask His Majesty's Government what plans they have to ensure that citizenship is treated equally with other statutory national curriculum subjects in Ofsted's inspection framework, and that Ofsted inspections and public reporting reflect schools' statutory obligations to delivery citizenship education. Answered by Baroness Smith of Malvern - Minister of State (Department for Work and Pensions) This is a matter for His Majesty’s Chief Inspector, Sir Martyn Oliver. I have asked him to write to my noble Friend directly and a copy of his reply will be placed in the Libraries of both Houses. |
|
Supported Housing: Young People
Asked by: Baroness Lister of Burtersett (Labour - Life peer) Wednesday 19th November 2025 Question to the Department for Work and Pensions: To ask His Majesty's Government whether they have considered piloting changes to Universal Credit taper rates for young people in supported housing; and what options they are considering to assist people living in supported housing to take on more paid work. Answered by Baroness Sherlock - Minister of State (Department for Work and Pensions) People on a low income living in Supported Housing or Temporary Accommodation, receive Universal Credit for help with their daily living costs and Housing Benefit for help with their housing costs. Customers living in Supported Housing are also able to access higher levels of housing support through Housing Benefit.
The Department for Work and Pensions acknowledges there is a challenge presented by the interaction between Universal Credit and Housing Benefit for those living in Supported and Temporary Accommodation and receiving their housing support through Housing Benefit.
We are considering options to improve work incentives for residents of supported housing and temporary accommodation, while taking into account the views of stakeholders. Any future decisions on housing support will be made in the round, prioritising measures that best meet Government objectives within the current fiscal environment.
It remains the department’s priority to ensure that those who can work are supported to enter the labour market and to sustain employment.
|
|
Support for Mortgage Interest
Asked by: Baroness Lister of Burtersett (Labour - Life peer) Wednesday 19th November 2025 Question to the Department for Work and Pensions: To ask His Majesty's Government what plans they have to act on the findings of the Impact Assessment of Support for Mortgage Interest Loans, published in May 2025, including those relating to the experiences and outcomes of disabled claimants and other protected groups. Answered by Baroness Sherlock - Minister of State (Department for Work and Pensions) Since its introduction in April 2018, my Department has kept the Support for Mortgage Interest (SMI) loan scheme under review. As a result of this, improvements to the scheme were introduced in 2021 and in 2023. The first of these allowed loans to be ‘ported’ to a new property rather than be repaid. This was primarily aimed at disabled recipients who may need to move home due to changes in their disability requirements.
The research published in May 2025 concluded SMI had the intended impact on recipients, to reduce arrears and repossessions. There are no current plans to introduce further changes. |
|
Support for Mortgage Interest
Asked by: Baroness Lister of Burtersett (Labour - Life peer) Wednesday 26th November 2025 Question to the Department for Work and Pensions: To ask His Majesty's Government what steps they have taken since the Impact Assessment on Converting Support for Mortgage Interest from a benefit into a loan, published in June 2017, identified limited data on disabled claimants using the Support for Mortgage Interest loan scheme; and what measures they have taken to address the impact assessment's conclusion that the scheme was likely to have a disproportionate impact on disabled claimants. Answered by Baroness Sherlock - Minister of State (Department for Work and Pensions) Support for Mortgage Interest (SMI) transitioned from a benefit to a loan in April 2018. Support was provided at the same level as before, ensuring the same degree of protection against repossession.
SMI loans are not repayable until the property is sold and then, only to the extent that there is any available equity.
Since SMI converted to a loan, the Department has regularly reviewed the impact of the policy on its recipients, including on people with disabilities. In March 2021, loan ‘porting’ was introduced to allow SMI recipients to transfer their loan to a new property rather than repay. The primary purpose of this change was to enable disabled recipients to move home due to changes in their disability requirements. Further changes were introduced in April 2023 which extended eligibility to in-work Universal Credit recipients and support was provided after three months instead of nine.
Two separate research projects related to SMI have been conducted and published, in March 2022 and May 2025. Both are publicly available, and a copy will be deposited of both publications in the House of Lords library. |
|
Universal Credit: Young People
Asked by: Baroness Lister of Burtersett (Labour - Life peer) Monday 24th November 2025 Question to the Department for Work and Pensions: To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of whether Universal Credit should be increased for those aged under 25 who are living independently, in line with payments to those aged over 25. Answered by Baroness Sherlock - Minister of State (Department for Work and Pensions) There are no plans to change the under 25 standard allowance rate.
This government is committed to rebuild opportunities for young people, so that every young person can fulfil their potential, and we are taking significant steps to support people to do so including through our Get Britain Working reforms. The under 25 standard allowance rate maintains the incentive for young people to find, and progress in work and the Department for Work and Pensions provides a range of support to help people into employment.
For those who live independently or have additional living costs, Universal Credit includes separate elements to support all eligible customers with these, including elements for housing, children, childcare costs, disabled people, and carers.
We continue to work in close partnership with other government departments to ensure that care leavers can access the right skills, opportunities and wider support, to move towards sustained employment and career progression. The Department provides a range of targeted additional support for care leavers including access to the higher one-bedroom Local Housing Allowance rate up to the age of 25, as well as tailored support through Jobcentre Plus. We review this regularly. |
| Live Transcript |
|---|
|
Note: Cited speaker in live transcript data may not always be accurate. Check video link to confirm. |
|
5 Nov 2025, 6:36 p.m. - House of Lords "amendment is amendment 57, which has already been debated. Therefore Baroness Lister of Burtersett not " Division: Amendment:56 - View Video - View Transcript |
|
5 Nov 2025, 6:36 p.m. - House of Lords "Baroness Lister of Burtersett not moved. Not not moved. Well, as we now come to the group of amendments " Lord Deputy Speaker - View Video - View Transcript |
|
11 Nov 2025, 4:41 p.m. - House of Lords "also, if I may say so, to my noble friend Baroness Lister of Burtersett, the noble Lord German, the noble Lord Sentamu, and the " Lord Hanson of Flint, The Minister of State, Home Department (Labour) - View Video - View Transcript |