Baroness Lister of Burtersett Alert Sample


Alert Sample

View the Parallel Parliament page for Baroness Lister of Burtersett

Information between 28th December 2025 - 7th January 2026

Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.


Calendar
Tuesday 27th January 2026
Baroness Lister of Burtersett (Labour - Life peer)

Oral questions - Main Chamber
Subject: Whether a child's rights impact assessment was conducted on the proposals affecting children in (1) Restoring Order and Control (CP1418) and (2) A Fairer Pathway to Settlement (CP1448)
View calendar - Add to calendar


Division Votes
5 Jan 2026 - Diego Garcia Military Base and British Indian Ocean Territory Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Lister of Burtersett voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 121 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 210 Noes - 131
5 Jan 2026 - Diego Garcia Military Base and British Indian Ocean Territory Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Lister of Burtersett voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 105 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 132 Noes - 124
5 Jan 2026 - Diego Garcia Military Base and British Indian Ocean Territory Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Lister of Burtersett voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 120 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 131 Noes - 127
5 Jan 2026 - Diego Garcia Military Base and British Indian Ocean Territory Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Lister of Burtersett voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 120 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 194 Noes - 130
5 Jan 2026 - Diego Garcia Military Base and British Indian Ocean Territory Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Lister of Burtersett voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 123 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 168 Noes - 178
6 Jan 2026 - Sentencing Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Lister of Burtersett voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 125 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 204 Noes - 136
6 Jan 2026 - Sentencing Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Lister of Burtersett voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 97 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 41 Noes - 97
6 Jan 2026 - Sentencing Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Lister of Burtersett voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 122 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 134 Noes - 185
6 Jan 2026 - Sentencing Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Lister of Burtersett voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 133 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 180 Noes - 219
6 Jan 2026 - Sentencing Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Lister of Burtersett voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 130 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 182 Noes - 209


Written Answers
Asylum
Asked by: Baroness Lister of Burtersett (Labour - Life peer)
Friday 2nd January 2026

Question to the Home Office:

To ask His Majesty's Government when they plan to introduce the new safe and legal routes set out in Restoring Order and Control, updated on 21 November, and what estimate they have made of the number of refugees who will be able to enter through those routes.

Answered by Lord Hanson of Flint - Minister of State (Home Office)

The UK has a proud history of providing protection and we continue to welcome refugees and people in need through our safe and legal routes.

As announced in Restoring Order and Control, we are developing new capped sponsored refugee pathways across education, labour and community routes. This transformative change to safe and legal routes will revolutionise the way in which we offer opportunities to refugees. Policy development is underway, and the Home Office is working at pace with partners to design and operationalise these routes as soon as practicable.

Visas: Asylum
Asked by: Baroness Lister of Burtersett (Labour - Life peer)
Friday 2nd January 2026

Question to the Home Office:

To ask His Majesty's Government, with regard to the protection work and study visa proposed in Restoring Order and Control, updated on 21 November, what the fee level will be; what criteria will be used to govern entry through that route; and how soon asylum seekers will be able to earn settlement on that route.

Answered by Lord Hanson of Flint - Minister of State (Home Office)

The full details of the Core Protection offer, and the Protection Work and Study route, remain subject to further policy development which will be set out in due course. Settlement requirements will also be considered as part of our consultation. We are currently consulting on how the settlement system should be reformed and how those reforms should be implemented.

Asylum: Employment
Asked by: Baroness Lister of Burtersett (Labour - Life peer)
Friday 2nd January 2026

Question to the Home Office:

To ask His Majesty's Government, with regard to the asylum policy in Restoring Order and Control, updated on 21 November, whether asylum seekers who are awaiting a decision after 12 months will be able to apply for jobs.

Answered by Lord Hanson of Flint - Minister of State (Home Office)

Asylum seekers are eligible to apply for permission to work in the UK if their claim has been outstanding for 12 months or more, through no fault of their own. There are no current plans to change this policy.

Social Security Benefits
Asked by: Baroness Lister of Burtersett (Labour - Life peer)
Wednesday 31st December 2025

Question to the Department for Work and Pensions:

To ask His Majesty's Government what their assessment is of the number of additional families and children who will be affected by the benefit cap as a result of its thresholds not being uprated from April 2026; and what its thresholds would be from April 2026 had they been uprated in line with the universal credit standard allowance since (1) 2016 when the current thresholds were set, and (2) 2023 when they were last uprated.

Answered by Baroness Sherlock - Minister of State (Department for Work and Pensions)

No assessment has been made of the number of additional families and children who will be affected by the benefit cap as a result of its thresholds not being uprated from April 2026.

The requested figures for thresholds uprated in line with the Universal Credit standard allowance are shown below. Note these are annual figures for 2026/27.

Actual

Uprated since 2016 (1)

Uprated since 2023 (2)

National (couple or lone parents)

£22,020

£26,732

£25,372

National (single)

£14,753

£17,910

£16,998

Greater London (couple or lone parents)

£25,323

£30,742

£29,178

Greater London (single)

£16,987

£20,598

£19,573

Immigration: Poverty
Asked by: Baroness Lister of Burtersett (Labour - Life peer)
Friday 2nd January 2026

Question to the Home Office:

To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the impact of the proposals in A Fairer Pathway to Settlement, published on 20 November, and Restoring Order and Control, updated on 21 November, on child poverty.

Answered by Lord Hanson of Flint - Minister of State (Home Office)

The earned settlement model, proposed in A Fairer Pathway to Settlement, is currently subject to a public consultation, running until 12 February 2026. Details of the earned settlement scheme will be finalised following that consultation. The final model will also be subject to economic and equality impact assessment, which we have committed to publish in due course.

Our proposals in Restoring Order and Control are designed to encourage refugees to contribute and integrate into UK society and the economy. We will have due regard to our section 55 duties and consider the best interests of children as the policy is further developed.

Child Benefit
Asked by: Baroness Lister of Burtersett (Labour - Life peer)
Monday 5th January 2026

Question to the HM Treasury:

To ask His Majesty's Government whether child benefit will be included in the proposals regarding public funds in A Fairer Pathway to Settlement, and Restoring Order and Control, published on 20 November.

Answered by Lord Livermore - Financial Secretary (HM Treasury)

Child Benefit is listed as a public fund in Section 115 of the Immigration and Asylum Act 1999 and paragraph 6 of the Immigration rules.

The Fairer Pathway to Settlement consultation on earned settlement seeks views on whether the qualifying period for settlement should be increased by five or ten years if the applicant has claimed public funds and whether the law should be changed so that it would be possible to make settlement subject to a “no recourse to public funds” condition.

The consultation is open to anyone who wishes to share their views, including individuals, organisations, and other stakeholders who may be affected by or have an interest in the proposed changes.

As set out in the Restoring Order and Control statement on the government’s asylum and returns policy, published on 21 November 2025, access to taxpayer funded benefits will be prioritised for those making an economic contribution. A consultation is planned for this year.