Baroness Pidgeon Alert Sample


Alert Sample

View the Parallel Parliament page for Baroness Pidgeon

Information between 7th July 2025 - 17th July 2025

Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.


Division Votes
7 Jul 2025 - Renters’ Rights Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Pidgeon voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 52 Liberal Democrat No votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 206 Noes - 198
7 Jul 2025 - Renters’ Rights Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Pidgeon voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 55 Liberal Democrat No votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 213 Noes - 209
7 Jul 2025 - Renters’ Rights Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Pidgeon voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 57 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes
Tally: Ayes - 274 Noes - 154
9 Jul 2025 - House of Lords (Hereditary Peers) Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Pidgeon voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 55 Liberal Democrat No votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 265 Noes - 247
9 Jul 2025 - House of Lords (Hereditary Peers) Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Pidgeon voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 62 Liberal Democrat No votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 284 Noes - 239
15 Jul 2025 - Renters’ Rights Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Pidgeon voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 54 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes
Tally: Ayes - 282 Noes - 158
15 Jul 2025 - Renters’ Rights Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Pidgeon voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 61 Liberal Democrat No votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 237 Noes - 223
15 Jul 2025 - Renters’ Rights Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Pidgeon voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 58 Liberal Democrat No votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 215 Noes - 240
15 Jul 2025 - Renters’ Rights Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Pidgeon voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 49 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes
Tally: Ayes - 214 Noes - 153
15 Jul 2025 - Renters’ Rights Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Pidgeon voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 52 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes
Tally: Ayes - 98 Noes - 148
14 Jul 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Pidgeon voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 38 Liberal Democrat No votes vs 1 Liberal Democrat Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 161 Noes - 191
14 Jul 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Pidgeon voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 51 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes
Tally: Ayes - 65 Noes - 170
14 Jul 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Pidgeon voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 45 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes
Tally: Ayes - 232 Noes - 137
14 Jul 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Pidgeon voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 54 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes
Tally: Ayes - 267 Noes - 153
14 Jul 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Pidgeon voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 54 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes
Tally: Ayes - 264 Noes - 158
16 Jul 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Pidgeon voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 34 Liberal Democrat No votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 148 Noes - 155
16 Jul 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Pidgeon voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 38 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes
Tally: Ayes - 47 Noes - 121
16 Jul 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Pidgeon voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 41 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes
Tally: Ayes - 124 Noes - 131
16 Jul 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Pidgeon voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 36 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes
Tally: Ayes - 184 Noes - 123
16 Jul 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Pidgeon voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 43 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes
Tally: Ayes - 202 Noes - 138
16 Jul 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Pidgeon voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 34 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes
Tally: Ayes - 180 Noes - 123
16 Jul 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Pidgeon voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 54 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes
Tally: Ayes - 304 Noes - 160
16 Jul 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Pidgeon voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 43 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes
Tally: Ayes - 100 Noes - 136
16 Jul 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Pidgeon voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 40 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes
Tally: Ayes - 248 Noes - 150


Speeches
Baroness Pidgeon speeches from: Rail Freight
Baroness Pidgeon contributed 1 speech (46 words)
Monday 14th July 2025 - Lords Chamber
Department for Transport
Baroness Pidgeon speeches from: Road and Rail Projects
Baroness Pidgeon contributed 1 speech (528 words)
Monday 14th July 2025 - Lords Chamber
Department for Transport
Baroness Pidgeon speeches from: Transport Act 2000 (Air Traffic Services) (Prescribed Terms) Regulations 2025
Baroness Pidgeon contributed 2 speeches (418 words)
Monday 14th July 2025 - Grand Committee
Department for Transport
Baroness Pidgeon speeches from: European Union Entry/Exit System
Baroness Pidgeon contributed 2 speeches (83 words)
Wednesday 9th July 2025 - Lords Chamber
Department for Transport


Written Answers
Electric Vehicles: Pedestrian Areas
Asked by: Baroness Pidgeon (Liberal Democrat - Life peer)
Tuesday 8th July 2025

Question to the Department for Transport:

To ask His Majesty's Government what consideration they have given to introducing legislation to enable local authorities and other public organisations reclaim the costs of removing dumped electric hire-scheme bikes and scooters from scheme operators.

Answered by Lord Hendy of Richmond Hill - Minister of State (Department for Transport)

The dumping of hire bikes and e-scooters is clearly unacceptable. As announced in December’s English Devolution White Paper, we will legislate to empower local leaders to manage shared cycle schemes. This will include consideration of how costs arising from monitoring of and enforcement against this kind of antisocial use could be recouped by local authorities in the future. Existing e-scooter trials are run under the supervision of the Department for Transport. Within these trials, local authorities, working with their e-scooter operator, will determine requirements for fleet management, including how to tackle overcrowding at parking bays.

Canal and River Trust
Asked by: Baroness Pidgeon (Liberal Democrat - Life peer)
Tuesday 8th July 2025

Question to the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs:

To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the risk of pollution and flooding resulting from the dumping of electric hire-scheme bikes in canals and rivers, as reported by the Canal and River Trust.

Answered by Baroness Hayman of Ullock - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs)

As announced in December’s English Devolution White Paper, the Government will legislate to empower local leaders to regulate hire bike schemes. These powers will enable local authorities to better identify and tackle issues arising from schemes, such as antisocial behaviour.

Dumped e-bikes are an eyesore and nuisance however they represent a very low pollution risk overall to river water quality. This is because the amount of pollution that could come from them is extremely small when considering overall dilution by the river. However, they should be removed as soon as possible to minimise any risk from degradation of batteries etc, which over time could release low levels of pollution.

The EA use their permissive powers to carry out routine maintenance on some designated main rivers, which includes obstruction removal.

Dementia: Diagnosis
Asked by: Baroness Pidgeon (Liberal Democrat - Life peer)
Wednesday 9th July 2025

Question to the Department of Health and Social Care:

To ask His Majesty's Government what steps they are taking to strengthen support for early dementia diagnosis, including through the enhancement of the NHS Health Check for those aged over 40, and the provision of risk reduction advice.

Answered by Baroness Merron - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department of Health and Social Care)

The Government and NHS England remain committed to recovering the dementia diagnosis rate. The new approach to planning guidance will improve the operating model, giving local leaders the freedom and autonomy they need to provide the best services to their local community, including those with dementia.

The NHS Health Check, a core component of England’s cardiovascular disease (CVD) prevention programme, aims to prevent some cases of dementia in eligible people by making them aware that many of the risk factors for CVD are the same as those for dementia, and that what is good for the heart is also good for the brain. Through the programme, people aged 65 to 74 years old are also made aware of the signs and symptoms of dementia, and are signposted to local memory services where appropriate.

We are considering the guidance supporting the dementia component of the NHS Health Check, to ensure it reflects the most recent evidence and best practice.

Dementia: Diagnosis
Asked by: Baroness Pidgeon (Liberal Democrat - Life peer)
Wednesday 9th July 2025

Question to the Department of Health and Social Care:

To ask His Majesty's Government what support they are providing for research and development into new diagnostic technologies for dementia, including blood-based biomarker tests.

Answered by Baroness Merron - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department of Health and Social Care)

Government responsibility for delivering dementia research is shared between the Department of Health and Social Care, with research delivered via the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR), and the Department for Science, Innovation and Technology, with research delivered via UK Research and Innovation.

The Government’s Dame Barbara Windsor Dementia Goals programme has invested £13 million into a range of biomarker innovation projects which include a broad range of biomarker technologies, ranging from an artificial intelligence tool designed to improve the accuracy of blood tests for dementia, to using retinal scans to detect early-onset dementia decades before symptoms. Some of these innovations could support improved diagnosis in the future, if validated for clinical use.

Alongside Alzheimer’s Research UK, Alzheimer’s Society, and the People’s Postcode Lottery, the NIHR is funding the Blood Biomarker Challenge which seeks to produce the clinical and economic data that could make the case for the use of a blood test in the National Health Service to support diagnosis of dementia.

The NIHR has also invested nearly £11 million of funding to develop new digital approaches for the timely detection and diagnosis of dementia. Funded projects include a range of innovative tests such as spatial awareness, image recognition, hearing tests, and monitoring sleep disturbances.

The UK Dementia Research Institute, primarily funded by the Government, aims to increase our basic scientific understanding of dementia and its causes, unlocking pathways to developing ways to prevent, diagnose, and treat the condition. The NIHR is investing £20 million in the UK Dementia Research Institute over four years to enable discoveries to be taken out of the laboratory and into the lives of people that need them.

The NIHR continues to welcome funding applications for research into any aspect of human health and care, including dementia. These applications are subject to peer review and judged in open competition, with awards being made on the basis of the importance of the topic to patients and health and care services, value for money, and scientific quality.

Welcoming applications on dementia to all NIHR programmes enables maximum flexibility both in terms of the amount of research funding a particular area can be awarded, and the type of research which can be funded.




Baroness Pidgeon mentioned

Live Transcript

Note: Cited speaker in live transcript data may not always be accurate. Check video link to confirm.

14 Jul 2025, 8:55 p.m. - House of Lords
"by Baroness Pidgeon about Dawlish and I have an interest, I live down the other end there. I'm not "
Lord Berkeley (Labour) - View Video - View Transcript
14 Jul 2025, 8:57 p.m. - House of Lords
"pausing at Dawlish which I refer to Baroness Baroness Pidgeon, the muck monitoring will take place is not should take place should I say to my noble Lord, it's will take place "
Lord Berkeley (Labour) - View Video - View Transcript
14 Jul 2025, 8:47 p.m. - House of Lords
"real difference. Baroness Pidgeon was much more focused on the announcement itself which I'm sure "
Lord Hendy of Richmond Hill, Minister of State (Department for Transport) (Labour) - View Video - View Transcript


Select Committee Documents
Wednesday 18th June 2025
Oral Evidence - Children's Commissioner's Office

Public Services Committee

Found: Q9 Baroness Pidgeon: You have given us quite a lot of examples.



Bill Documents
Jul. 15 2025
HL Bill 110-I Marshalled list for Committee
Planning and Infrastructure Bill 2024-26
Amendment Paper

Found: After Clause 47 BARONESS PIDGEON LORD LANSLEY 58_ After Clause 47, insert the following new Clause

Jul. 14 2025
HL Bill 110 Running list of amendments – 14 July 2025
Planning and Infrastructure Bill 2024-26
Amendment Paper

Found: Clause 47 BARONESS PIDGEON LORD LANSLEY _ Clause 47, page 59, line 25, at end insert— “(5A) After

Jul. 11 2025
HL Bill 110 Running list of amendments – 11 July 2025
Planning and Infrastructure Bill 2024-26
Amendment Paper

Found: Clause 47 BARONESS PIDGEON LORD LANSLEY _ Clause 47, page 59, line 25, at end insert— “(5A) After

Jul. 10 2025
HL Bill 110 Running list of amendments – 10 July 2025
Planning and Infrastructure Bill 2024-26
Amendment Paper

Found: Clause 47 BARONESS PIDGEON LORD LANSLEY _ Clause 47, page 59, line 25, at end insert— “(5A) After

Jul. 09 2025
HL Bill 110 Running list of amendments – 9 July 2025
Planning and Infrastructure Bill 2024-26
Amendment Paper

Found: Clause 47 BARONESS PIDGEON LORD LANSLEY _ Clause 47, page 59, line 25, at end insert— “(5A) After

Jul. 08 2025
HL Bill 110 Running list of amendments - 8 July 2025
Planning and Infrastructure Bill 2024-26
Amendment Paper

Found: affecting the character of listed buildings. 7 Planning and Infrastructure Bill Clause 47 BARONESS PIDGEON



Deposited Papers
Wednesday 9th July 2025
Department for Transport
Source Page: Letter dated 07/07/2025 from Lord Hendy of Richmond to Baroness Pidgeon regarding a question on provisions for disabled passengers in the pilots of self-driving vehicles: liability in collisions involving these vehicles. 2p.
Document: Lord_Hendy_-_Baroness_Pidgeon_-_AV_liability.docx.pdf (PDF)

Found: Letter dated 07/07/2025 from Lord Hendy of Richmond to Baroness Pidgeon regarding a question on provisions




Baroness Pidgeon - Select Committee Information

Calendar
Wednesday 10th September 2025 11 a.m.
Public Services Committee - Private Meeting
View calendar - Add to calendar
Wednesday 3rd September 2025 11 a.m.
Public Services Committee - Private Meeting
View calendar - Add to calendar


Select Committee Documents
Tuesday 8th July 2025
Written Evidence - CMI0021 - Child Maintenance

Child Maintenance - Public Services Committee
Tuesday 8th July 2025
Written Evidence - CMI0035 - Child Maintenance

Child Maintenance - Public Services Committee
Tuesday 8th July 2025
Written Evidence - CMI0011 - Child Maintenance

Child Maintenance - Public Services Committee
Tuesday 8th July 2025
Written Evidence - CMI0012 - Child Maintenance

Child Maintenance - Public Services Committee
Tuesday 8th July 2025
Written Evidence - CMI0043 - Child Maintenance

Child Maintenance - Public Services Committee
Tuesday 8th July 2025
Written Evidence - CMI0048 - Child Maintenance

Child Maintenance - Public Services Committee
Tuesday 8th July 2025
Written Evidence - CMI0054 - Child Maintenance

Child Maintenance - Public Services Committee
Tuesday 8th July 2025
Written Evidence - CMI0062 - Child Maintenance

Child Maintenance - Public Services Committee
Tuesday 8th July 2025
Written Evidence - CMI0050 - Child Maintenance

Child Maintenance - Public Services Committee
Tuesday 8th July 2025
Written Evidence - CMI0046 - Child Maintenance

Child Maintenance - Public Services Committee
Tuesday 8th July 2025
Written Evidence - CMI0044 - Child Maintenance

Child Maintenance - Public Services Committee
Tuesday 8th July 2025
Written Evidence - CMI0106 - Child Maintenance

Child Maintenance - Public Services Committee
Tuesday 8th July 2025
Written Evidence - CMI0110 - Child Maintenance

Child Maintenance - Public Services Committee
Tuesday 8th July 2025
Written Evidence - CMI0102 - Child Maintenance

Child Maintenance - Public Services Committee
Tuesday 8th July 2025
Written Evidence - CMI0040 - Child Maintenance

Child Maintenance - Public Services Committee
Tuesday 8th July 2025
Written Evidence - Bubbles
CMI0108 - Child Maintenance

Child Maintenance - Public Services Committee
Tuesday 8th July 2025
Written Evidence - CMI0027 - Child Maintenance

Child Maintenance - Public Services Committee
Tuesday 8th July 2025
Written Evidence - CMI0093 - Child Maintenance

Child Maintenance - Public Services Committee
Tuesday 8th July 2025
Written Evidence - CMI0093 - Child Maintenance

Child Maintenance - Public Services Committee
Tuesday 8th July 2025
Written Evidence - CMI0071 - Child Maintenance

Child Maintenance - Public Services Committee
Tuesday 8th July 2025
Written Evidence - CMI0091 - Child Maintenance

Child Maintenance - Public Services Committee
Tuesday 8th July 2025
Written Evidence - CMI0086 - Child Maintenance

Child Maintenance - Public Services Committee
Tuesday 8th July 2025
Written Evidence - CMI0076 - Child Maintenance

Child Maintenance - Public Services Committee
Tuesday 8th July 2025
Written Evidence - CMI0077 - Child Maintenance

Child Maintenance - Public Services Committee
Tuesday 8th July 2025
Written Evidence - CMI0067 - Child Maintenance

Child Maintenance - Public Services Committee
Wednesday 18th June 2025
Oral Evidence - Children's Commissioner's Office

Public Services Committee


Select Committee Inquiry
29 Jul 2025
Police transcription
Public Services Committee (Select)

Submit Evidence (by 29 Sep 2025)


Equal access to justice is a cornerstone of our criminal justice system and it is vital that everyone involved at each stage in any criminal case is presented with a fair and accurate account of evidential proceedings. Transcripts are produced by the police and outsourced companies as a public service to the courts. They provide a written record of a police interview with a suspect or witness or to help in understanding unclear audio material.

This inquiry will focus on how transcripts are produced, the training and guidance to services that produce transcripts, the standards and quality assurance of transcripts, and their use within court