Baroness Pinnock Alert Sample


Alert Sample

View the Parallel Parliament page for Baroness Pinnock

Information between 29th March 2025 - 18th April 2025

Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.


Division Votes
31 Mar 2025 - Mental Health Bill [HL] - View Vote Context
Baroness Pinnock voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 50 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes
Tally: Ayes - 209 Noes - 143
31 Mar 2025 - Mental Health Bill [HL] - View Vote Context
Baroness Pinnock voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 50 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes
Tally: Ayes - 218 Noes - 143
31 Mar 2025 - Mental Health Bill [HL] - View Vote Context
Baroness Pinnock voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 55 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes
Tally: Ayes - 272 Noes - 157
2 Apr 2025 - Mental Health Bill [HL] - View Vote Context
Baroness Pinnock voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 14 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes
Tally: Ayes - 19 Noes - 112
2 Apr 2025 - Mental Health Bill [HL] - View Vote Context
Baroness Pinnock voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 15 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes
Tally: Ayes - 51 Noes - 106
2 Apr 2025 - Mental Health Bill [HL] - View Vote Context
Baroness Pinnock voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 44 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes
Tally: Ayes - 49 Noes - 129
2 Apr 2025 - Bus Services (No. 2) Bill [HL] - View Vote Context
Baroness Pinnock voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 52 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes
Tally: Ayes - 59 Noes - 148
2 Apr 2025 - Bus Services (No. 2) Bill [HL] - View Vote Context
Baroness Pinnock voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 52 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes
Tally: Ayes - 226 Noes - 142
2 Apr 2025 - Bus Services (No. 2) Bill [HL] - View Vote Context
Baroness Pinnock voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 52 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes
Tally: Ayes - 240 Noes - 148
2 Apr 2025 - Bus Services (No. 2) Bill [HL] - View Vote Context
Baroness Pinnock voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 51 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes
Tally: Ayes - 242 Noes - 157
2 Apr 2025 - Bus Services (No. 2) Bill [HL] - View Vote Context
Baroness Pinnock voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 54 Liberal Democrat No votes vs 2 Liberal Democrat Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 214 Noes - 216


Speeches
Baroness Pinnock speeches from: Non-Domestic Rating (Multipliers and Private Schools) Bill
Baroness Pinnock contributed 1 speech (266 words)
Consideration of Commons amendments and / or reasons
Tuesday 1st April 2025 - Lords Chamber
Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government
Baroness Pinnock speeches from: Birmingham City Council
Baroness Pinnock contributed 1 speech (578 words)
Tuesday 1st April 2025 - Lords Chamber
Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government


Written Answers
Leasehold: Insurance
Asked by: Baroness Pinnock (Liberal Democrat - Life peer)
Tuesday 8th April 2025

Question to the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government:

To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the answer by Baroness Taylor of Stevenage on 24 March (HL Deb cols 1447–9), whether they have met insurance companies about the rising insurance costs of leaseholders due to the lower remediation required by PAS 9980.

Answered by Baroness Taylor of Stevenage - Baroness in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip)

Officials in my department engage regularly with the insurance industry and Minister Norris met representatives earlier in the year. PAS9980:2022 sets out steps that can be taken to identify and assess risk factors as well as mitigation steps that might improve the risk rating of a building via a holistic and fact-based assessment of a building’s construction.

Once buildings comply with Building Regulations or align with industry-accepted PAS 9980 standards, insurers should offer affordable premiums and should not be prescribing additional remedial works.

BSI has commenced the review, which will include a six-week public consultation, and BSI anticipates publishing the updated guidance in early 2026. The consultation will provide the opportunity for industry and the public to participate in the review of PAS 9980.

Flats: Fire Prevention
Asked by: Baroness Pinnock (Liberal Democrat - Life peer)
Tuesday 8th April 2025

Question to the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government:

To ask His Majesty's Government whether they will amend the PAS 9980 Fire Risk Appraisal of External Walls and Cladding of Flats code of practice to require compliance with building regulations and statutory guidance in force at the time of construction.

Answered by Baroness Taylor of Stevenage - Baroness in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip)

The British Standards Institution (BSI) developed and published PAS 9980 and Government has sponsored BSI to review it to make sure it captures best practices, meets market needs, and identifies any necessary revisions. BSI has commenced the review, which will include a six-week public consultation, and BSI anticipates publishing the updated guidance in early 2026. The consultation will provide the opportunity for industry and the public to participate in the review of PAS 9980.

Private Education: Business Rates
Asked by: Baroness Pinnock (Liberal Democrat - Life peer)
Thursday 10th April 2025

Question to the HM Treasury:

To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the remarks by Lord Khan of Burnley on 1 April (HL Deb col 134) that clause 3 of the Non-Domestic Ratings (Multipliers and Private Schools) Bill provides powers to "exclude classes of hereditament from the higher multiplier", whether they will exclude those hereditaments that are publicly funded, including (1) hospitals, (2) police stations, and (3) educational buildings.

Answered by Lord Livermore - Financial Secretary (HM Treasury)

To deliver our manifesto pledge, we intend to introduce permanently lower tax rates for high street retail, hospitality, and leisure (RHL) properties, with rateable values below £500,000, from 2026-27.

This tax cut must be sustainably funded, and so we intend to apply a higher rate from 2026-27 on the most valuable properties - those with a Rateable Value of £500,000 and above. These represent less than one per cent of all properties, but cover the majority of large distribution warehouses, including those used by online giants, so that they can help support the viability of high streets.

The Spring Statement confirmed the spending envelope for phase 2 of the spending review, which will deliver new mission-led, technology-enabled and reform-driven budgets for departments. We will consider the full range of priorities and pressures facing departments in the round, including any impact of the higher multiplier, when setting these budgets.

The rates for any new business rate multipliers will be set at Budget 2025 so that the Government can take into account the upcoming revaluation outcomes as well as the economic and fiscal context.




Baroness Pinnock mentioned

Live Transcript

Note: Cited speaker in live transcript data may not always be accurate. Check video link to confirm.

1 Apr 2025, 3:41 p.m. - House of Lords
"they came from all their financial background. The noble Baroness Pinnock invited me to write a letter on a question. I will reject that invitation because I have the answer "
Lord Khan of Burnley, Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Housing, Communities and Local Government) (Labour) - View Video - View Transcript