Youth Unemployment

Baroness Stedman-Scott Excerpts

Tuesday 24th March 2026 Lords Chamber

I am often asked, ‘So when will you do welfare reform?’ Well, I tell the House that this is welfare reform. Putting work and opportunity at the heart of our system is the best reform we can make. Asking not just, ‘What are you entitled to?’ but ‘How can we help you change your life?’ is the change that the system needs. That view lies behind the changes that I am announcing in this package. I commend the Statement to the House”.

[Baroness Stedman-Scott (Con)]

My Lords, I begin by making it very clear that we on these Benches believe it is vital that young people are supported into work. We wholeheartedly support the announcement about the new opportunities for young people, and we want to see them succeed. The evidence is clear that periods of unemployment at the start of a working life can have long-lasting and deeply damaging consequences. That makes early intervention not just desirable but essential. It is therefore welcome that the Department for Work and Pensions recognises the importance of this issue, but recognition alone is not enough.

The latest figures from the Office for National Statistics give us all, across this House, cause for concern. Youth unemployment among those aged 18 to 24 has risen to 14.5%, the highest level in nearly a decade. That represents a generation being denied opportunity: young people unable to take their first step on the ladder, to build skills or to contribute to the economy. It is no surprise that Helen Dickinson, chief executive at the British Retail Consortium, has said that

“the UK faces the prospect of a jobless generation ... this vital step on the career ladder is cracking under the high costs of employment”.

To be helpful to the noble Baroness, who I know shares my obsession with getting people, especially young people, into work, I just ask that when we turn to the past 14 years, she will not say that we had 14 years to sort this, because our record was not all that bad. Look at the facts. In 2010, the NEET rate stood at 16%, and by 2019 it had fallen to 10.7%. In turn, youth unemployment fell from around 20% in 2010 to 10.7% in 2022. We acknowledge that Covid created immense challenges and that the rates went up, but it was not all that bad on our watch. We did a lot of good, but we undoubtedly could and should have done more. However, youth unemployment has risen in each year under this Government, now reaching nearly 15% among 16 to 24 year-olds. It is against this deeply troubling backdrop that the Government bring forward this policy, with which we are pleased.

What we see from the Government here is part of a worrying pattern. When the economy fails to deliver the outcomes we all desire, the Government do not seem to pause, reflect or correct the course; instead they reach instinctively for an intervention to compel the private sector to behave as they wish. I have no doubt that the private sector would love to be creating jobs and getting young people into their workforce. This is the return of an interventionist doctrine that places political direction above market judgment. Many believed that this approach had been left behind, but it is now clearly back at the heart of government thinking. We see it in attempts to direct pension fund investment, allocating other people’s savings in line with political priorities rather than saver outcomes. We see it again here. Having failed to create the conditions for a strong labour market, the Government’s answer is not to enable growth but to intervene, to manage and to control.

We on these Benches are not merely supporters of employment, we are the party of work. Before the pandemic, employment reached a record high of 76.5%, while economic inactivity fell to a record low of 20.5%. That was not by chance; it was the result of a deliberate approach, one that trusted enterprise, rewarded effort and created the conditions for businesses to grow and hire. Opportunity should not be manufactured by the state, it should be generated by growth, and that is the approach we would like to see from the Government, but it is one that, sadly, they seem to have rejected.

I have several questions off the back of this Statement which I hope the Minister will address. If there are too many, I am very happy for her to write to me. How will participants be selected for these roles? There is always a tendency to go for those people who are easy to help. How will the Government ensure that those furthest from the labour market and in the most difficulty get help? Have private sector employers been driving the development of this policy, or has it come from Whitehall? How are the Government ensuring that employers are at the heart of this intervention? How will the Government measure the success of this policy, and over what timeframe? Will the performance be communicated to the whole House?

What will happen to young people at the end of the six-month placement? Are employers expected to absorb the full costs thereafter, and if so, on what basis? Do the Government already intend to extend the timeline? Does the Minister genuinely believe that short-term placements, particularly ones concentrated in sectors such as hospitality, will address the deep-rooted productivity and skills challenges in our economy? Crucially, what does the Minister believe is driving the current rise in youth unemployment? Is not the uncomfortable truth that the Government have taxed jobs and discouraged hiring, and are now asking taxpayers to subsidise the very employment opportunities that their policies have undermined? The British Retail Consortium is unequivocal, saying that in 2025 alone, the cost of employing a full-time entry-level worker has risen by 10%.

If the Minister is seeking the root cause of today’s labour market difficulties, I suggest that the Government need look no further than their own political record and policies. Businesses across the country point to the same pressures: burdensome employment regulation such as the Employment Rights Act, a sharp increase in wage and minimum wage costs, higher and inflexible business rates and ever-growing compliance obligations.

This debate comes down to a fundamental choice: do we continue down the path of higher taxes, heavier regulation and greater state intervention, or return to a model that genuinely creates opportunity, backs enterprise, rewards work and enables business to grow? That is the model that we used to deliver high, record employment. I am sure that the Minister and the Government are serious about tackling youth unemployment, but they must move beyond treating the symptoms and begin to address the causes. They must stop trying to control outcomes and instead create the conditions in which those outcomes can be achieved. That means easing the burden on those who create jobs, restoring confidence and recognising that sustainable employment is built not by government decree but by economic growth. Until they confront that reality, these policies will do little more than mask failure, at great cost to the taxpayer and even greater cost to the prospects of the next generation.

[Lord Palmer of Childs Hill (LD)]

My Lords, I thank the Minister very much—she did not repeat the Statement, but we have read it—and the noble Baroness, Lady Stedman-Scott, for raising so many questions the answers to which I look forward to hearing.

We have 739,000 young people aged 16 to 24—nearly 100,000 more than last year—unemployed and sitting on benefits of £338 per month. I make no apologies for repeating this figure, but I give it in numbers and not as a percentage, because percentages are misleading and you cannot really understand what they mean. These unemployed 16 to 24 year-olds are, on average, searching and applying over five months for hundreds of roles, with less than 1% success—so they give up entirely. Yet employers report millions of vacancies remaining unfilled. This is not a shortage of jobs but a failure of matching: the right opportunities for the right candidates remain unsurfaced and undiscovered.

Given that the DWP is already piloting matching technologies at some jobcentres, for which I congratulate it—I know about the one in Leicester—can the Minister set out the department’s timeline for scaling these tools nationally across all jobcentres? Critically, what measurable improvement in time to employment does the department expect from this rollout? Additionally, can the Government explain why they are removing the funding for apprenticeships for management? Will they rethink the impact of the national insurance contribution hike on hospitality, retail and tourism? If we dealt with that, it could substantially help with youth unemployment. This is a big problem and I hope the Minister can answer the few questions I have raised and those raised by the noble Baroness, Lady Stedman-Scott.