Social Media: Non-consensual Sexual Deepfakes Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate
Department: Department for Business and Trade

Social Media: Non-consensual Sexual Deepfakes

Earl of Effingham Excerpts
Wednesday 14th January 2026

(1 day, 22 hours ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Watch Debate Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Baroness Lloyd of Effra Portrait Baroness Lloyd of Effra (Lab)
- View Speech - Hansard - - - Excerpts

I cannot speak for others but, from our perspective, it is clear under the Online Safety Act what illegal content is, and what the child safety duties are. Operating in the United Kingdom means abiding by those; it means doing the risk assessments, taking swift action against priority offences, and abiding by all of the regime in place here in the UK.

Earl of Effingham Portrait The Earl of Effingham (Con)
- View Speech - Hansard - -

My Lords, this is all happening on social media, so does the Minister agree with the largest union representing teachers in the UK on banning social media for under-16s?

Baroness Lloyd of Effra Portrait Baroness Lloyd of Effra (Lab)
- View Speech - Hansard - - - Excerpts

There are strong views about access to social media for under-16s, and we understand that it is an area of concern for many, especially parents. We are keeping evidence on the impact of social media on children under review. While a ban is not our current policy, we are closely monitoring what is happening in Australia and looking carefully at the evidence. We have already taken some of the boldest steps to protect children with the Online Safety Act, and we are listening to views, for example, from the NSPCC and others. These include concerns about setting age limits which might mean that people are unprepared for the digital world, which is also a responsibility in terms of media literacy and ensuring that people can operate safely and securely in this new digital world.