To match an exact phrase, use quotation marks around the search term. eg. "Parliamentary Estate". Use "OR" or "AND" as link words to form more complex queries.


Keep yourself up-to-date with the latest developments by exploring our subscription options to receive notifications direct to your inbox

Written Question
Legal Opinion
Tuesday 5th December 2023

Asked by: Lord Anderson of Ipswich (Crossbench - Life peer)

Question to the Ministry of Justice:

To ask His Majesty's Government what rules, guidance or conventions they consider to be applicable to the provision of professional legal services, including advocacy, legal representation and the giving of legal advice, by retired UK judges.

Answered by Lord Bellamy

There is a longstanding convention that prohibits former holders of salaried judicial office from returning to private legal practice. This is reflected in the terms and conditions of service which apply on appointment to judicial office, which state that candidates accept appointment on the understanding that it is “intended for the remainder of a person’s professional life” and that “following termination of their appointment they will not return to private practice as a barrister or a solicitor".

The Government has noted the report, “Work in Judicial Retirement”, which relates to judges in the High Court and above and the longstanding convention prohibiting salaried judges from returning to legal practice. The Government has also noted the evidence of Lord Burnett, the then Lord Chief Justice, to the Justice Select Committee in 2018, that the convention “is part and parcel of ensuring, and always has been, that the standing of our judiciary is very high indeed.”


Written Question
Judges: Retirement
Tuesday 5th December 2023

Asked by: Lord Anderson of Ipswich (Crossbench - Life peer)

Question to the Ministry of Justice:

To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the policy report by Patrick O’Brien and Ben Yong, Work in Judicial Retirement, published in June.

Answered by Lord Bellamy

There is a longstanding convention that prohibits former holders of salaried judicial office from returning to private legal practice. This is reflected in the terms and conditions of service which apply on appointment to judicial office, which state that candidates accept appointment on the understanding that it is “intended for the remainder of a person’s professional life” and that “following termination of their appointment they will not return to private practice as a barrister or a solicitor".

The Government has noted the report, “Work in Judicial Retirement”, which relates to judges in the High Court and above and the longstanding convention prohibiting salaried judges from returning to legal practice. The Government has also noted the evidence of Lord Burnett, the then Lord Chief Justice, to the Justice Select Committee in 2018, that the convention “is part and parcel of ensuring, and always has been, that the standing of our judiciary is very high indeed.”


Written Question
Closed Material Procedure in the Justice and Security Act 2013 Review
Tuesday 26th September 2023

Asked by: Lord Anderson of Ipswich (Crossbench - Life peer)

Question to the Ministry of Justice:

To ask His Majesty's Government when they plan to publish their response to Sir Duncan Ouseley’s independent report on the operation of the closed material procedure under the Justice and Security Act 2013, which was carried out pursuant to section 13 of the Act and laid before Parliament in November 2022.

Answered by Lord Bellamy

The Government is carefully considering the recommendations made by Sir Duncan Ouseley in his Independent Report on the Operation of Closed Material Procedures under the Justice and Security Act 2013 and is working to establish how any recommendations that we take forward could be sustainably and effectively implemented. Subject to this detailed ongoing work, the Government aims to publish its response to Sir Duncan’s report by early 2024.


Written Question
Law Commission
Monday 13th February 2023

Asked by: Lord Anderson of Ipswich (Crossbench - Life peer)

Question to the Ministry of Justice:

To ask His Majesty's Government what steps they have taken to prepare and lay before Parliament the annual reports, required by section 3A of the Law Commissions Act 1965, on the extent to which Law Commission recommendations were implemented for the reporting years (1) 2018–19, (2) 2019–20, (3) 2020–21, (4) 2021–22, and (5) 2022–23.

Answered by Lord Bellamy

A draft of the Government’s report on the implementation of Law Commission recommendations is currently being prepared and is expected to be laid before Parliament as soon as practicable this year. It will provide an update on the implementation status of all relevant Law Commission recommendations since the report was last published in 2018.


Speech in Lords Chamber - Mon 21 Feb 2022
Judicial Review and Courts Bill

"My Lords, I am slightly more relaxed than my noble friend Lord Pannick about the prospective-only quashing power in the new Section 29A(1)(b)—it is, in its essentials, already acknowledged in our law—but only so long as the courts are free to use it without constraint or presumption. In the Spectrum …..."
Lord Anderson of Ipswich - View Speech

View all Lord Anderson of Ipswich (XB - Life peer) contributions to the debate on: Judicial Review and Courts Bill

Speech in Lords Chamber - Mon 21 Feb 2022
Judicial Review and Courts Bill

"My noble friend just said that no case has come close to applying a prospective-only quashing order since a unanimous House of Lords said in the Spectrum case that they could imagine such cases. How does he explain the British Academy of Songwriters case, which he has heard both the …..."
Lord Anderson of Ipswich - View Speech

View all Lord Anderson of Ipswich (XB - Life peer) contributions to the debate on: Judicial Review and Courts Bill

Speech in Lords Chamber - Mon 21 Feb 2022
Judicial Review and Courts Bill

"..."
Lord Anderson of Ipswich - View Speech

View all Lord Anderson of Ipswich (XB - Life peer) contributions to the debate on: Judicial Review and Courts Bill

Speech in Lords Chamber - Mon 21 Feb 2022
Judicial Review and Courts Bill

"My Lords, I rise to speak to my Amendment 13. Two of the greatest joys of practice at the Bar are finding oneself on the same side as the noble Lord, Lord Pannick, and feeling that the noble and learned Lord, Lord Etherton, might possibly be with you. On this …..."
Lord Anderson of Ipswich - View Speech

View all Lord Anderson of Ipswich (XB - Life peer) contributions to the debate on: Judicial Review and Courts Bill

Speech in Lords Chamber - Mon 21 Feb 2022
Judicial Review and Courts Bill

"I thank all noble Lords who have contributed to this notable debate—notable not just for its quality but for the rare and even forceful unanimity that it evoked among nearly all lawyers who spoke. I exempt, of course, the Minister, who was paid, or possibly not paid, for taking the …..."
Lord Anderson of Ipswich - View Speech

View all Lord Anderson of Ipswich (XB - Life peer) contributions to the debate on: Judicial Review and Courts Bill

Speech in Lords Chamber - Tue 08 Feb 2022
Nationality and Borders Bill

"My Lords, I struggle with some of the dilemmas presented by Clauses 29 to 37, for very much the reasons given by the noble and learned Lord, Lord Clarke of Nottingham, in his frank and powerful speech of 1 February on Clause 11. There are, after all, circumstances in which …..."
Lord Anderson of Ipswich - View Speech

View all Lord Anderson of Ipswich (XB - Life peer) contributions to the debate on: Nationality and Borders Bill