Information between 13th October 2025 - 23rd October 2025
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
| Division Votes |
|---|
|
13 Oct 2025 - Bus Services (No. 2) Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Lord Ashcombe voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 128 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 138 Noes - 175 |
|
13 Oct 2025 - Bus Services (No. 2) Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Lord Ashcombe voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 130 Conservative Aye votes vs 1 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 147 Noes - 189 |
|
14 Oct 2025 - Business of the House - View Vote Context Lord Ashcombe voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 183 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 211 Noes - 261 |
|
14 Oct 2025 - Renters’ Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Ashcombe voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 161 Conservative Aye votes vs 2 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 192 Noes - 239 |
|
14 Oct 2025 - Renters’ Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Ashcombe voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 142 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 169 Noes - 212 |
|
14 Oct 2025 - Renters’ Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Ashcombe voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 162 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 204 Noes - 215 |
|
15 Oct 2025 - Public Authorities (Fraud, Error and Recovery) Bill - View Vote Context Lord Ashcombe voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 117 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 139 Noes - 186 |
|
15 Oct 2025 - Public Authorities (Fraud, Error and Recovery) Bill - View Vote Context Lord Ashcombe voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 163 Conservative Aye votes vs 2 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 200 Noes - 194 |
|
20 Oct 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context Lord Ashcombe voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 160 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 235 Noes - 164 |
|
21 Oct 2025 - Public Authorities (Fraud, Error and Recovery) Bill - View Vote Context Lord Ashcombe voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 103 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 138 Noes - 138 |
|
21 Oct 2025 - Public Authorities (Fraud, Error and Recovery) Bill - View Vote Context Lord Ashcombe voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 162 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 262 Noes - 157 |
|
21 Oct 2025 - Public Authorities (Fraud, Error and Recovery) Bill - View Vote Context Lord Ashcombe voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 167 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 270 Noes - 160 |
|
21 Oct 2025 - Public Authorities (Fraud, Error and Recovery) Bill - View Vote Context Lord Ashcombe voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 136 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 212 Noes - 144 |
|
21 Oct 2025 - Public Authorities (Fraud, Error and Recovery) Bill - View Vote Context Lord Ashcombe voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 158 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 253 Noes - 153 |
|
22 Oct 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context Lord Ashcombe voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 81 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 84 Noes - 113 |
|
22 Oct 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context Lord Ashcombe voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 80 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 83 Noes - 113 |
|
22 Oct 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context Lord Ashcombe voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 156 Conservative Aye votes vs 1 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 246 Noes - 169 |
|
22 Oct 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context Lord Ashcombe voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 143 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 173 Noes - 120 |
|
22 Oct 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context Lord Ashcombe voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 145 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 163 Noes - 236 |
|
22 Oct 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context Lord Ashcombe voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 144 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 228 Noes - 113 |
| Written Answers |
|---|
|
Employment: Disciplinary Proceedings
Asked by: Lord Ashcombe (Conservative - Excepted Hereditary) Monday 20th October 2025 Question to the Department for Business and Trade: To ask His Majesty's Government whether they have evidence that requiring employers to permit workers to be accompanied at disciplinary or grievance hearings by persons other than trade union officials or other workers is likely to increase the cost, complexity and length of such hearings. Answered by Baroness Lloyd of Effra - Baroness in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip) The current legal framework on the right to be accompanied has been in place for a long time. The framework aims to keep disciplinary and grievance procedures internal to the workplace. Expanding the types of organisations that could be involved in representing workers at discipline and grievance meetings could lead to these meetings requiring legal representation for both the worker and employer. This would invariably increase the cost of holding a hearing, add complexity and delays, and decrease the chance of amicable resolution as both parties become entrenched in a dispute. |
|
Employment: Disciplinary Proceedings
Asked by: Lord Ashcombe (Conservative - Excepted Hereditary) Monday 20th October 2025 Question to the Department for Business and Trade: To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the impact of expanding the right to accompaniment at disciplinary or grievance hearings to persons other than trade union officials or other workers on minority groups and equality outcomes. Answered by Baroness Lloyd of Effra - Baroness in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip) The current legal framework on the right to be accompanied has been in place for a long time. The framework aims to keep disciplinary and grievance procedures internal to the workplace. Expanding the types of organisations that could be involved in representing workers at discipline and grievance meetings could lead to these meetings requiring legal representation for both the worker and employer. This would invariably increase the cost of holding a hearing, add complexity and delays, and decrease the chance of amicable resolution as both parties become entrenched in a dispute. |
|
Employment: Disciplinary Proceedings
Asked by: Lord Ashcombe (Conservative - Excepted Hereditary) Monday 20th October 2025 Question to the Department for Business and Trade: To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of enabling companions permitted to accompany workers at disciplinary or grievance hearings to provide legal representation or act as legal advocates for workers during those hearings. Answered by Baroness Lloyd of Effra - Baroness in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip) The current legal framework on the right to be accompanied has been in place for a long time. The framework aims to keep disciplinary and grievance procedures internal to the workplace. Expanding the types of organisations that could be involved in representing workers at discipline and grievance meetings could lead to these meetings requiring legal representation for both the worker and employer. This would invariably increase the cost of holding a hearing, add complexity and delays, and decrease the chance of amicable resolution as both parties become entrenched in a dispute. |
| Calendar |
|---|
|
Wednesday 22nd October 2025 10 a.m. Environment and Climate Change Committee - Private Meeting View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Wednesday 29th October 2025 10 a.m. Environment and Climate Change Committee - Oral evidence Subject: COP30 At 10:00am: Oral evidence Kate Hughes - UK Lead Climate Negotiator at Department for Energy Security and Net Zero Matt Toombs - Director for International Climate Finance and Strategy at Department for Energy Security and Net Zero View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Wednesday 5th November 2025 10 a.m. Environment and Climate Change Committee - Private Meeting View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Wednesday 12th November 2025 10 a.m. Environment and Climate Change Committee - Oral evidence Subject: Drought Preparedness At 10:00am: Oral evidence Professor Jason Lowe OBE - Head of Climate Services at Met Office Professor Alan MacDonald - Head of Groundwater at British Geological Survey At 11:00am: Oral evidence The Baroness Brown of Cambridge DBE FREng FRS - Chair of the Adaptation Committee at Climate Change Committee Richard Millar - Head of Adaptation at Climate Change Committee View calendar - Add to calendar |
| Select Committee Inquiry |
|---|
|
24 Oct 2025
Drought Preparedness Environment and Climate Change Committee (Select) Not accepting submissions This inquiry will focus on drought management practices and policies and consider whether these are sufficient for responding to current and future droughts. The inquiry will cover impacts, monitoring, engagement and changes in supply and demand, aiming to identify opportunities for improved drought preparedness and response in England. |