To match an exact phrase, use quotation marks around the search term. eg. "Parliamentary Estate". Use "OR" or "AND" as link words to form more complex queries.


Keep yourself up-to-date with the latest developments by exploring our subscription options to receive notifications direct to your inbox

Written Question
Prisoners' Release
Wednesday 1st February 2023

Asked by: Lord Bradley (Labour - Life peer)

Question to the Ministry of Justice:

To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Lord Bellamy on 30 November 2022 (HL3458), how many of those people were serving an extended determinate sentence with a custodial tariff of (1) six months or less, (2) more than six months but less than 12 months, (3) more than 12 months but less than two years, (4) more than two years but less than four years, (5) more than four years but less than six years, (6) more than six years but less than 10 years, and (7) more than 10 years.

Answered by Lord Bellamy - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Ministry of Justice)

The table below sets out the minimum terms of imprisonment (custodial tariffs) of prisoners serving an extended determinate sentence (EDS) who are eligible for release via parole as part of their EDS, who were released after their first parole review in each of the last five years in which full data is available.

Sentence length

Release year

2017

2018

2019

2020

2021

Six months or less

0

0

*

*

*

More than six months to less than twelve months

0

0

*

0

*

From twelve months to less than two years

4

*

8

*

6

From two years to less than four years

38

31

38

59

43

From four years to less than six years

72

137

166

208

192

From six years to less than ten years

26

59

118

197

232

Ten years or more

3

*

20

31

58

Data sources and quality:

1. Some prisoners were released without accessing the parole process because they were deported or, exceptionally, left prison following early release on compassionate grounds

2. Some parole hearings were not completed as a result of the prisoner receiving a new sentence or being transferred to secure hospital under the Mental Health Act 1983.

3. Total figures in the table do not match published total releases for EDS offenders, as some EDS offenders are not eligible for release via parole as part of their EDS.

4. The figures in this table have been drawn from administrative IT systems which, as with any large-scale recording system, are subject to possible errors with data entry and processing.

5. Disclosure control: An asterisk (*) has been used to suppress values of one or two. This is to prevent the disclosure of individual information. Further suppression may be applied where needed.


Written Question
Parole
Wednesday 25th January 2023

Asked by: Lord Bradley (Labour - Life peer)

Question to the Ministry of Justice:

To ask His Majesty's Government how many people serving a life sentence had their first parole hearing on or after tariff expiry; and, for each year since 2009, how many of these were (1) directed for release, or (2) not directed for release, following the hearing.

Answered by Lord Bellamy - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Ministry of Justice)

By law any prisoner serving a life sentence who has completed the minimum term (tariff) set by the Court at the point of sentence is eligible to be considered for release, but will actually be released only when the Parole Board concludes that it is no longer necessary on the grounds of public protection for them to remain confined.

The total number of prisoners serving a life sentence that had their first parole hearing on or after tariff expiry; and were (1) directed for release, or (2) not directed for release, following the hearing, is shown in the following table;

Number of Life Sentenced Offenders

Year

Release

Not directed for release

2009

*

*

2010

40

32

2011

70

64

2012

77

31

2013

91

30

2014

74

41

2015

87

69

2016

119

98

2017

119

64

2018

110

76

2019

108

89

2020

133

72

2021

106

93

*Records from before 2010 could not be located using administrative systems.

Notes:

Every effort is made to ensure that the figures presented are accurate and complete. However, it is important to note that this data has been extracted from large administrative data systems generated by HM Prison & Probation Service. Consequently, care should be taken to ensure data collection processes and their inevitable limitations are taken into account when those data are used.


Written Question
Prisons: Males
Wednesday 25th January 2023

Asked by: Lord Bradley (Labour - Life peer)

Question to the Ministry of Justice:

To ask His Majesty's Government what was (1) the capacity, and (2) the population, of the adult male open Category D prison estate in each week since 1 December 2022.

Answered by Lord Bellamy - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Ministry of Justice)

The table below identifies the overall operational capacity and population of the adult male open estate as at each Friday since 25th November 2022.

Date

Adult Male Open Estate

Total

25/11/2022

Operational Capacity

5337

Population

4712

02/12/2022

Operational Capacity

5360

Population

4708

09/12/2022

Operational Capacity

5360

Population

4741

16/12/2022

Operational Capacity

5360

Population

4762

23/12/2022

Operational Capacity

5360

Population

4771

30/12/2022

Operational Capacity

5360

Population

4732

06/01/2023

Operational Capacity

5360

Population

4702

The data provided in the table above does not include prisoners living in the open units of closed prisons (i.e. at HMP Norwich and HMP Stoke Heath).


Written Question
Prison Sentences
Wednesday 25th January 2023

Asked by: Lord Bradley (Labour - Life peer)

Question to the Ministry of Justice:

To ask His Majesty's Government how many people serving (1) a sentence of Imprisonment for Public Protection, and (2) a life sentence, were recalled to custody whilst on licence in the community in each year since 2009.

Answered by Lord Bellamy - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Ministry of Justice)

Every offender in the community on licence is liable to be recalled to prison, if they fail to comply with their licence conditions in such a way as to indicate the risk they present is no longer capable of being effectively managed in the community, so as to protect the public.

The following table shows the number of people serving (1) a sentence of Imprisonment for Public Protection (IPP), and (2) a life sentence, that were recalled to custody whilst on licence in the community in each year, from 31 December 2009 to 31 December 2021.

Year

Number of IPP offenders recalled (Bracketed figure is recalls as a percentage of total cases on licence)

Total number of IPP offenders on licence

Number of Life sentenced offenders recalled (Bracketed figure is recalls as a percentage of total cases on licence)

Total number of Life sentenced offenders on licence

2010 (1)

34

--

95

--

2011

60 (14%)

429

118 (6%)

1,896

2012

123 (14%)

857

124 (6%)

2,242

2013

240 (19%)

1,231

174 (11%)

1,656

2014

332 (23%)

1,445

201 (9%)

2,220

2015

363 (20%)

1,850

212 (9%)

2,410

2016 (1)

482

--

212

--

2017

507 (19%)

2,666

222 (7%)

2,980

2018

637 (22%)

2,935

288 (9%)

3,256

2019

710 (23%)

3,030

350 (9%)

4,060

2020

639 (20%)

3,125

290 (7%)

4,361

2021

632 (20%)

3,241

340 (8%)

4,522

Notes:

  1. Due to a problem with the archived database, figures for 2010 and 2016 are unavailable.
  2. The Imprisonment for Public Protection (IPP) sentence was introduced in 2005 as an indeterminate sentence targeted at serious offenders who, although they were thought to pose an ongoing risk to public safety, did not merit a life sentence. IPP sentences were abolished in 2012 by the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act.
  3. Every effort is made to ensure that the figures presented are accurate and complete. However, it is important to note that this data has been extracted from large administrative data systems generated by HM Prison & Probation Service. Consequently, care should be taken to ensure data collection processes and their inevitable limitations are taken into account when those data are used.

Written Question
Prison Sentences
Wednesday 25th January 2023

Asked by: Lord Bradley (Labour - Life peer)

Question to the Ministry of Justice:

To ask His Majesty's Government how many people serving (1) a sentence of Imprisonment for Public Protection, and (2) a life sentence, were under probation supervision following their release from prison in each year since 2009.

Answered by Lord Bellamy - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Ministry of Justice)

The Government is committed to the protection of the public and the effective management of offenders. By law, prisoners serving indeterminate sentences who have completed their tariff will be released only when the Parole Board concludes that it is no longer necessary on the grounds of public protection for them to remain confined.

Statistics on the indeterminate population in prisons are routinely published as part of the Offender Management Statistics Quarterly: https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/offender-management-statistics-quarterly.

The following table shows the number of people, serving (1) a sentence of Imprisonment for Public Protection, and (2) a life sentence, under post-release supervision in the community by the Probation Service, from 31 December 2009 to 31 December 2021.

Year

Imprisonment for Public Protection (2)

Life imprisonment

2009

93

1,507

2010 (1)

..

..

2011

429

1,896

2012

857

2,242

2013

1,231

1,656

2014

1,445

2,220

2015

1,850

2,410

2016 (1)

..

..

2017

2,666

2,980

2018

2,935

3,256

2019

3,030

4,060

2020

3,125

4,361

2021

3,241

4,522

Notes:

  1. Due to a problem with the archived database, figures for this year (2022) are unavailable.
  2. The Imprisonment for Public Protection (IPP) sentence was introduced in 2005 as an indeterminate sentence targeted at serious offenders who, although they were thought to pose an ongoing risk to public safety, did not merit a life sentence. IPP sentences were abolished in 2012 by the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act.
  3. Every effort is made to ensure that the figures presented are accurate and complete. However, it is important to note that this data has been extracted from large administrative data systems generated by HM Prison & Probation Service. Consequently, care should be taken to ensure data collection processes and their inevitable limitations are taken into account when those data are used.

Written Question
Integrated Care Boards
Thursday 19th January 2023

Asked by: Lord Bradley (Labour - Life peer)

Question to the Department of Health and Social Care:

To ask His Majesty's Government what are the names of the ordinary members on each Integrated Care Board; and for each member, what (1) knowledge, and (2) experience, they have relating to the prevention, diagnosis and treatment of mental illness.

Answered by Lord Markham - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department of Health and Social Care)

Integrated care boards (ICBs) are required to publish the list of ICB board members including ordinary members in accordance with the Health and Care Act 2022. ICBs have made the information publicly available on its websites regarding board members including expertise and knowledge. Details of ICB board membership is not held by Government in a central record.


Written Question
Prisoners: Police Custody
Thursday 19th January 2023

Asked by: Lord Bradley (Labour - Life peer)

Question to the Ministry of Justice:

To ask His Majesty's Government how many prisoners were held in police cells under Operation Safeguard in each week since 1 December 2022.

Answered by Lord Bellamy - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Ministry of Justice)

As of 11th January, no prisoners have been housed in police cells as part of Operation Safeguard since it was activated on 30th November 2022.

Police forces across the country use police cells occasionally in normal practice to house prisoners overnight, for example due to late sitting courts.


Written Question
Mental Health Services: Children and Young People
Friday 9th December 2022

Asked by: Lord Bradley (Labour - Life peer)

Question to the Department of Health and Social Care:

To ask His Majesty's Government how much of the £2.3 billion earmarked for Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services has now been invested in those services; and, of that amount, how much has been allocated to local authority Children's Services to support children in care.

Answered by Lord Markham - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department of Health and Social Care)

This information is not held in the format requested. However, local commissioners will determine how this funding will be used to meet the health needs of the local population.


Written Question
Custodial Treatment
Monday 5th December 2022

Asked by: Lord Bradley (Labour - Life peer)

Question to the Ministry of Justice:

To ask His Majesty's Government how many (1) male, and (2) female, prisoners are currently serving an extended determinate sentence with a custodial term of (a) less than 12 months, (b) between 12 months and two years, (c) between two and four years, (d) between four and five years, (e) between five and seven years, (f) between seven and 10 years, (g) 10 years to less than 14 years, and (h) 14 years or more.

Answered by Lord Bellamy - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Ministry of Justice)

The table below shows the number of prisoners serving an extended determinate sentence (EDS), by custodial term, and by sex, as at 30 September 2022, in England and Wales:

Male

Female

Less than 1 year

5

0

1 year to less than 2 years

8

0

2 years to less than 4 years

138

*

4 years to less than 5 years

474

23

5 years to less than 7 years

971

19

7 years to less than 10 years

1,516

18

10 years to less than 14 years

1,871

23

14 years or more

1,895

*

Sentence length not recorded

3

0

The data above shows the custodial term imposed under the extended determinate sentence and therefore the maximum time offenders serving the sentence could spend in custody. Such prisoners may be released after having served two thirds of this custodial term at the discretion of the parole board.

Data sources and quality

The figures in this table have been drawn from administrative IT systems which, as with any large scale recording system, are subject to possible errors with data entry and processing. Small values marked by an asterisk have been suppressed in the above table to protect the identity of individuals.

Source: Prison NOMIS

PQ HL3588 (Ministry of Justice; Data and Analysis (Directorate))


Written Question
Prisoners
Monday 5th December 2022

Asked by: Lord Bradley (Labour - Life peer)

Question to the Ministry of Justice:

To ask His Majesty's Government what is the (1) mean, and (2) median, number of months that prisoners serving (a) a life sentence, and (b) an indeterminate sentence of Imprisonment for Public Protection, have spent in prison beyond their original tariff.

Answered by Lord Bellamy - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Ministry of Justice)

The Government is committed to the protection of the public and the effective management of offenders. By law, a prisoner serving an indeterminate sentence who has completed his/her tariff will be released only when the independent Parole Board concludes that it is no longer necessary on the grounds of public protection for the prisoner to remain confined.

The following table shows the (1) mean, and (2) median, number of months that prisoners serving (a) a life sentence, and (b) an indeterminate sentence of Imprisonment for Public Protection, have spent in prison beyond their original tariff as at 30 September 2022.

Over tariff Months

Status

Mean

Median

Unreleased Life

111

93

Unreleased IPP

109

113

Notes for all figures in the above table:

  1. Tariff length is the time between date of sentence and tariff expiry date.
  2. Figures do not include whole-life orders.
  3. Figures relate only to cases where the tariff expiry date is passed, and the offender remains in prison unreleased.
  4. Numbers are subject to revision as more data become available.

The figures in these tables have been drawn from administrative IT systems which, as with any large-scale recording system, are subject to possible errors with data entry and processing. Data has been supplied for as many of the requested years as it is possible to provide within cost limits; earlier years may not be available due to changes in recording over time.