Information between 5th December 2025 - 24th January 2026
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
| Division Votes |
|---|
|
10 Dec 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Eatwell voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 144 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 244 Noes - 220 |
|
10 Dec 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Eatwell voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 144 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 219 Noes - 223 |
|
5 Jan 2026 - Diego Garcia Military Base and British Indian Ocean Territory Bill - View Vote Context Lord Eatwell voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 123 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 168 Noes - 178 |
|
5 Jan 2026 - Diego Garcia Military Base and British Indian Ocean Territory Bill - View Vote Context Lord Eatwell voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 121 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 210 Noes - 131 |
|
5 Jan 2026 - Diego Garcia Military Base and British Indian Ocean Territory Bill - View Vote Context Lord Eatwell voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 120 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 194 Noes - 130 |
|
5 Jan 2026 - Diego Garcia Military Base and British Indian Ocean Territory Bill - View Vote Context Lord Eatwell voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 120 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 131 Noes - 127 |
|
6 Jan 2026 - Sentencing Bill - View Vote Context Lord Eatwell voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 125 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 204 Noes - 136 |
|
6 Jan 2026 - Sentencing Bill - View Vote Context Lord Eatwell voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 122 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 134 Noes - 185 |
|
12 Jan 2026 - Diego Garcia Military Base and British Indian Ocean Territory Bill - View Vote Context Lord Eatwell voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 147 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 201 Noes - 169 |
|
14 Jan 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context Lord Eatwell voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 152 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 213 Noes - 211 |
|
14 Jan 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context Lord Eatwell voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 162 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 278 Noes - 176 |
|
21 Jan 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context Lord Eatwell voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 134 Labour No votes vs 3 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 261 Noes - 150 |
|
21 Jan 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context Lord Eatwell voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 139 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 65 Noes - 162 |
|
21 Jan 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context Lord Eatwell voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 140 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 207 Noes - 159 |
| Speeches |
|---|
|
Lord Eatwell speeches from: Autumn Budget 2025
Lord Eatwell contributed 1 speech (517 words) Thursday 4th December 2025 - Lords Chamber HM Treasury |
| Parliamentary Debates |
|---|
|
Autumn Budget 2025
152 speeches (54,901 words) Thursday 4th December 2025 - Lords Chamber HM Treasury Mentions: 1: Lord Young of Cookham (Con - Life peer) My Lords, it is always a pleasure to follow the noble Lord, Lord Eatwell. - Link to Speech 2: Lord Hollick (Lab - Life peer) The Government should publish, as my noble friend Lord Eatwell said, their strategy to make tax policy - Link to Speech 3: Lord Hintze (Con - Life peer) The noble Lord, Lord Eatwell, talked about him earlier. - Link to Speech 4: Baroness Kramer (LD - Life peer) The noble Lords, Lord Willetts, Lord Wood and Lord Eatwell, and the noble Baroness, Lady Shawcross-Wolfson - Link to Speech 5: Lord True (Con - Life peer) As the noble Lords, Lord Wood of Anfield, Lord Eatwell, and others referred to, it has opportunities - Link to Speech |
| Calendar |
|---|
|
Wednesday 7th January 2026 10 a.m. Financial Services Regulation Committee - Private Meeting View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Wednesday 14th January 2026 10 a.m. Financial Services Regulation Committee - Private Meeting View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Wednesday 21st January 2026 10 a.m. Financial Services Regulation Committee - Private Meeting View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Wednesday 28th January 2026 10 a.m. Financial Services Regulation Committee - Private Meeting View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Wednesday 4th February 2026 10 a.m. Financial Services Regulation Committee - Oral evidence Subject: Growth and proposed regulation of stablecoins in the UK At 10:05am: Oral evidence Chris Giles - Journalist at Financial Times At 11:15am: Oral evidence Professor Arthur E. Wilmarth, Jr. View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Wednesday 11th February 2026 10 a.m. Financial Services Regulation Committee - Oral evidence Subject: Growth and proposed regulation of stablecoins in the UK At 10:00am: Oral evidence Professor Simon Gleeson At 11:00am: Oral evidence Professor Kern Alexander View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Wednesday 25th February 2026 10 a.m. Financial Services Regulation Committee - Oral evidence Subject: Growth and proposed regulation of stablecoins in the UK View calendar - Add to calendar |
| Select Committee Inquiry |
|---|
|
28 Jan 2026
Growth and proposed regulation of stablecoins in the UK Financial Services Regulation Committee (Select) Submit Evidence (by 11 Mar 2026) This inquiry will examine the development of, and proposed regulatory response to, stablecoins in the UK. In particular, the inquiry will examine the extent to which stablecoins might disrupt the traditional models of provision of financial services, including for banking and payments services. The inquiry will also assess the potential opportunities and risks that the growth of stablecoins might have on UK’s financial services sector, and whether the Bank of England and FCA’s proposed regulatory frameworks provide measured and proportionate responses to these risks. |