Information between 7th April 2024 - 7th May 2024
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
Division Votes |
---|
23 Apr 2024 - Victims and Prisoners Bill - View Vote Context Lord Elliott of Mickle Fell voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 146 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 144 Noes - 154 |
23 Apr 2024 - Victims and Prisoners Bill - View Vote Context Lord Elliott of Mickle Fell voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 164 Conservative No votes vs 1 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 168 Noes - 177 |
23 Apr 2024 - Victims and Prisoners Bill - View Vote Context Lord Elliott of Mickle Fell voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 177 Conservative No votes vs 1 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 203 Noes - 192 |
23 Apr 2024 - Victims and Prisoners Bill - View Vote Context Lord Elliott of Mickle Fell voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 176 Conservative No votes vs 1 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 200 Noes - 192 |
23 Apr 2024 - Victims and Prisoners Bill - View Vote Context Lord Elliott of Mickle Fell voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 186 Conservative No votes vs 1 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 82 Noes - 211 |
22 Apr 2024 - Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill - View Vote Context Lord Elliott of Mickle Fell voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 188 Conservative No votes vs 1 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 240 Noes - 211 |
17 Apr 2024 - Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill - View Vote Context Lord Elliott of Mickle Fell voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 189 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 247 Noes - 195 |
17 Apr 2024 - Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill - View Vote Context Lord Elliott of Mickle Fell voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 193 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 245 Noes - 208 |
16 Apr 2024 - Victims and Prisoners Bill - View Vote Context Lord Elliott of Mickle Fell voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 180 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 176 Noes - 197 |
16 Apr 2024 - Victims and Prisoners Bill - View Vote Context Lord Elliott of Mickle Fell voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 177 Conservative No votes vs 1 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 185 Noes - 192 |
16 Apr 2024 - Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill - View Vote Context Lord Elliott of Mickle Fell voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 204 Conservative No votes vs 1 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 275 Noes - 218 |
16 Apr 2024 - Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill - View Vote Context Lord Elliott of Mickle Fell voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 208 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 253 Noes - 236 |
16 Apr 2024 - Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill - View Vote Context Lord Elliott of Mickle Fell voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 204 Conservative No votes vs 1 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 266 Noes - 227 |
16 Apr 2024 - Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill - View Vote Context Lord Elliott of Mickle Fell voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 205 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 258 Noes - 233 |
30 Apr 2024 - Victims and Prisoners Bill - View Vote Context Lord Elliott of Mickle Fell voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 166 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 67 Noes - 175 |
30 Apr 2024 - Victims and Prisoners Bill - View Vote Context Lord Elliott of Mickle Fell voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 191 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 209 Noes - 209 |
30 Apr 2024 - Victims and Prisoners Bill - View Vote Context Lord Elliott of Mickle Fell voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 199 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 238 Noes - 217 |
30 Apr 2024 - Victims and Prisoners Bill - View Vote Context Lord Elliott of Mickle Fell voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 191 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 214 Noes - 208 |
30 Apr 2024 - Victims and Prisoners Bill - View Vote Context Lord Elliott of Mickle Fell voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 199 Conservative No votes vs 1 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 222 Noes - 222 |
Written Answers | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GCE A-level
Asked by: Lord Elliott of Mickle Fell (Conservative - Life peer) Monday 8th April 2024 Question to the Department for Education: To ask His Majesty's Government what are the latest available data on the number and percentage of students who left school after their A-levels to go into work; and what percentage of them received (1) 100 UCAS points or above in their A-levels, and (2) 150 UCAS points or above in their A-levels. Answered by Baroness Barran - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Education) The department publishes information on the sustained destinations of students after 16-18 study, broken down by the level at which they studied. The table below gives the latest data on the number and percentage of students who were deemed to be at the end of 16-18 study in 2020/21 (2021 leavers) and their sustained destination in the 2021/22 academic year.
The destinations data does not include information on students’ A level results or UCAS points. However, over three quarters of students who studied an approved level 3 qualification completed A Levels.
|
||||||||||
Occupations
Asked by: Lord Elliott of Mickle Fell (Conservative - Life peer) Friday 12th April 2024 Question to the Cabinet Office: To ask His Majesty's Government when the Office for National Statistics plans to begin publishing data classifying jobs in the labour market based on the new six-digit Extended Standard Occupational Classification 2020 framework rather than the current four-digit Standard Occupational Classification 2020 framework. Answered by Baroness Neville-Rolfe - Minister of State (Cabinet Office) The information requested falls under the remit of the UK Statistics Authority. Please see the letter attached from the National Statistician and Chief Executive of the UK Statistics Authority.
Lord Elliott of Mickle Fell House of Lords London SW1A 0PW
04 April 2024
Dear Lord Elliott of Mickle Fell,
As National Statistician and Chief Executive of the UK Statistics Authority, I am responding to your Parliamentary Question asking when the Office for National Statistics (ONS) plans to begin publishing data classifying jobs in the labour market based on the new six-digit Extended Standard Occupational Classification 2020 framework rather than the current four-digit Standard Occupational Classification 2020 framework (HL3670).
The ONS collects information on the labour market status of individuals through the Labour Force Survey (LFS), which is a survey of people resident in households in the UK. In addition to their labour market status, working respondents provide a description of their job allowing us to classify their occupation to the appropriate Standard Occupational Classification 2020 (SOC2020) code.
Similarly, the 2021 Census collected information allowing us to identify the labour market status of individuals and classify their occupation in line with SOC2020.
Much of the job information from these sources, collected from respondents, do not contain sufficient detail to give an accurate coding at the six-digit lower-level classification. Consequently, the ONS currently has no plans to publish data at the six-digit SOC2020 level.
Yours sincerely,
Professor Sir Ian Diamond
|