Lord Foulkes of Cumnock Alert Sample


Alert Sample

View the Parallel Parliament page for Lord Foulkes of Cumnock

Information between 8th April 2026 - 18th April 2026

Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.


Division Votes
13 Apr 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Foulkes of Cumnock voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 141 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 162 Noes - 55
13 Apr 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Foulkes of Cumnock voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 140 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 135 Noes - 154
13 Apr 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Foulkes of Cumnock voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 146 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 214 Noes - 156
13 Apr 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Foulkes of Cumnock voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 150 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 65 Noes - 173
13 Apr 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Foulkes of Cumnock voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 155 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 69 Noes - 332
13 Apr 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Foulkes of Cumnock voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 157 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 257 Noes - 180
13 Apr 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Foulkes of Cumnock voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 154 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 247 Noes - 187
13 Apr 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Foulkes of Cumnock voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 150 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 178 Noes - 231
15 Apr 2026 - Victims and Courts Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Foulkes of Cumnock voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 169 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 270 Noes - 200
15 Apr 2026 - Victims and Courts Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Foulkes of Cumnock voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 165 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 209 Noes - 260
16 Apr 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Foulkes of Cumnock voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 131 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 135 Noes - 154
16 Apr 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Foulkes of Cumnock voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 132 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 142 Noes - 192
16 Apr 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Foulkes of Cumnock voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 130 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 225 Noes - 144
16 Apr 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Foulkes of Cumnock voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 117 Labour No votes vs 2 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 115 Noes - 121
16 Apr 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Foulkes of Cumnock voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 127 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 216 Noes - 141
16 Apr 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Foulkes of Cumnock voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 130 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 186 Noes - 144
16 Apr 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Foulkes of Cumnock voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 133 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 192 Noes - 142


Speeches
Lord Foulkes of Cumnock speeches from: Data Centres: Energy Demand
Lord Foulkes of Cumnock contributed 1 speech (70 words)
Thursday 16th April 2026 - Lords Chamber
Department for Energy Security & Net Zero
Lord Foulkes of Cumnock speeches from: Middle East
Lord Foulkes of Cumnock contributed 1 speech (80 words)
Tuesday 14th April 2026 - Lords Chamber
Leader of the House


Written Answers
Human Trafficking
Asked by: Lord Foulkes of Cumnock (Labour - Life peer)
Tuesday 14th April 2026

Question to the Home Office:

To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of whether enrolment on English-language courses in the UK has been used to support visa applications connected to trafficking or exploitation; and if so, whether any cases of concern have been identified.

Answered by Lord Hanson of Flint - Minister of State (Home Office)

The Home Office monitors trafficking and exploitation risks across the immigration system, and identifies and supports potential victims including through the National Referral Mechanism.

However, there is no evidence indicating systemic misuse of English‑language course enrolment for trafficking or exploitation purposes.

NHS: Protective Clothing
Asked by: Lord Foulkes of Cumnock (Labour - Life peer)
Friday 17th April 2026

Question to the Department of Health and Social Care:

To ask His Majesty's Government what steps they are taking to recover the £24 million of public funds lost in relation to the PPE contract for protective coveralls awarded to SG Recruitment; and what is the status of the claim submitted to the company’s liquidators.

Answered by Baroness Merron - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department of Health and Social Care)

The Department awarded personal protective equipment contracts to SG Recruitment during the COVID‑19 pandemic, including a contract for protective coveralls. The protective coveralls supplied under this contract did not meet the required specifications and were rejected. The Department therefore holds a claim in respect of the contract.

SG Recruitment is now in liquidation. The Department has submitted its claim to the company’s liquidators and will continue to engage with the liquidation process. The liquidators will advise creditors of the outcome of their investigations, and any distributions to creditors, in due course. The liquidators’ final report will be published at Companies House at the conclusion of the liquidation.

The handling of the Department’s claim against SG Recruitment was examined by the Covid Counter Fraud Commissioner as part of his review into COVID-19 era commercial activity.