Lord Foulkes of Cumnock Alert Sample


Alert Sample

View the Parallel Parliament page for Lord Foulkes of Cumnock

Information between 15th March 2026 - 4th April 2026

Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.


Division Votes
16 Mar 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Foulkes of Cumnock voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 148 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 198 Noes - 171
16 Mar 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Foulkes of Cumnock voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 134 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 48 Noes - 142
16 Mar 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Foulkes of Cumnock voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 147 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 201 Noes - 177
16 Mar 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Foulkes of Cumnock voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 150 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 276 Noes - 165
18 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Foulkes of Cumnock voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 108 Labour No votes vs 2 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 68 Noes - 163
18 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Foulkes of Cumnock voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 118 Labour No votes vs 3 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 119 Noes - 191
18 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Foulkes of Cumnock voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 121 Labour No votes vs 6 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 148 Noes - 185
18 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Foulkes of Cumnock voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 157 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 220 Noes - 191
18 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Foulkes of Cumnock voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 157 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 225 Noes - 189
18 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Foulkes of Cumnock voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 110 Labour No votes vs 2 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 70 Noes - 166
18 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Foulkes of Cumnock voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 142 Labour No votes vs 4 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 203 Noes - 148
18 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Foulkes of Cumnock voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 161 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 231 Noes - 188
18 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Foulkes of Cumnock voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 116 Labour Aye votes vs 2 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 180 Noes - 58
19 Mar 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Foulkes of Cumnock voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 106 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 135 Noes - 110
19 Mar 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Foulkes of Cumnock voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 110 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 191 Noes - 118
19 Mar 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Foulkes of Cumnock voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 107 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 217 Noes - 113
19 Mar 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Foulkes of Cumnock voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 112 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 184 Noes - 118
23 Mar 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Foulkes of Cumnock voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 148 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 188 Noes - 155
23 Mar 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Foulkes of Cumnock voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 149 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 77 Noes - 161
23 Mar 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Foulkes of Cumnock voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 159 Labour Aye votes vs 1 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 202 Noes - 225
23 Mar 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Foulkes of Cumnock voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 147 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 198 Noes - 159
23 Mar 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Foulkes of Cumnock voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 156 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 241 Noes - 175
24 Mar 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Foulkes of Cumnock voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 126 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 70 Noes - 132
24 Mar 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Foulkes of Cumnock voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 146 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 250 Noes - 158
24 Mar 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Foulkes of Cumnock voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 147 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 187 Noes - 157
24 Mar 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Foulkes of Cumnock voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 146 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 285 Noes - 156
24 Mar 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Foulkes of Cumnock voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 147 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 80 Noes - 166
25 Mar 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Foulkes of Cumnock voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 143 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 163 Noes - 195
25 Mar 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Foulkes of Cumnock voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 136 Labour No votes vs 6 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 266 Noes - 141
25 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Foulkes of Cumnock voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 140 Labour No votes vs 3 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 306 Noes - 145
25 Mar 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Foulkes of Cumnock voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 143 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 205 Noes - 147
25 Mar 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Foulkes of Cumnock voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 143 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 207 Noes - 148
25 Mar 2026 - National Insurance Contributions (Employer Pensions Contributions) Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Foulkes of Cumnock voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 133 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 95 Noes - 137
25 Mar 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Foulkes of Cumnock voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 140 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 200 Noes - 150
26 Mar 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Foulkes of Cumnock voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 126 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 64 Noes - 140
26 Mar 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Foulkes of Cumnock voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 123 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 152 Noes - 128
26 Mar 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Foulkes of Cumnock voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 128 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 115 Noes - 197
26 Mar 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Foulkes of Cumnock voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 129 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 171 Noes - 146


Speeches
Lord Foulkes of Cumnock speeches from: Lord Mandelson: Response to Humble Address Motion
Lord Foulkes of Cumnock contributed 1 speech (161 words)
Tuesday 17th March 2026 - Lords Chamber
Cabinet Office


Written Answers
Electronic Cigarettes: Sales
Asked by: Lord Foulkes of Cumnock (Labour - Life peer)
Wednesday 25th March 2026

Question to the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government:

To ask His Majesty's Government what consideration they will give to introducing regulations for the use of premises for the sale of vaping products, following the fire in Glasgow on 8 March.

Answered by Baroness Taylor of Stevenage - Baroness in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip)

The Tobacco and Vapes Bill provides powers for Ministers in England, Wales and Northern Ireland to establish a licensing scheme for the retail sale of tobacco, vaping and nicotine products in their respective nations. Instead of retail licensing, Scotland has an established register of tobacco and vape retailers which has been in place for over 15 years.

Retail licensing will strengthen enforcement of tobacco and vape legislation, supporting retailers who operate responsibly while deterring those who break the law. The Government sought evidence on the implementation of retail licensing through a call for evidence which closed in December last year. We will hold a subsequent consultation on our proposals before introducing regulations.

In terms of fire safety, the Regulatory Reform (Fire Safety) Order 2005 places a range of legal duties on Responsible Persons (the person in control of a premises which can include building owners, landlords and employers), chief among which is the need to undertake a fire risk assessment. The assessment must identify any general fire safety precautions that need to be taken to ensure that the premises, and people within it, are safe from fire. Additionally, the Responsible Person must put those precautions in place and ensure they are subject to a suitable system of maintenance.

In order to help Responsible Persons discharge their duties MHCLG publish a range of guides including a guide for persons with duties under the Regulatory Reform (Fire Safety) Order 2005 (as amended) and are in the process of updating the Offices and Shops guide where we will take any learning from this fire and see how this can be captured in guidance.

Sovereign Grant: Reviews
Asked by: Lord Foulkes of Cumnock (Labour - Life peer)
Monday 30th March 2026

Question to the HM Treasury:

To ask His Majesty's Government, in regard to section 7 of the Sovereign Grant Act 2011, on what date they expect to receive the report of the Royal Trustees on the 2026 review of the Sovereign Grant; and on what date they expect that report to be laid before Parliament.

Answered by Lord Livermore - Financial Secretary (HM Treasury)

As required by the Sovereign Grant Act 2011, the next review of the Sovereign Grant is taking place this year. Further detail will be announced in due course.

The Government is committed to bringing forward legislation to reset the Grant to a lower level from 2027-28 once Buckingham Palace reservicing works are completed.

Sovereign Grant
Asked by: Lord Foulkes of Cumnock (Labour - Life peer)
Monday 30th March 2026

Question to the HM Treasury:

To ask His Majesty's Government whether they plan to introduce legislation to adjust and reduce the Sovereign Grant in the next King's Speech.

Answered by Lord Livermore - Financial Secretary (HM Treasury)

As required by the Sovereign Grant Act 2011, the next review of the Sovereign Grant is taking place this year. Further detail will be announced in due course.

The Government is committed to bringing forward legislation to reset the Grant to a lower level from 2027-28 once Buckingham Palace reservicing works are completed.




Lord Foulkes of Cumnock mentioned

Live Transcript

Note: Cited speaker in live transcript data may not always be accurate. Check video link to confirm.

24 Mar 2026, 7:30 p.m. - House of Lords
">> >> Lord >> Lord Foulkes >> Lord Foulkes of >> Lord Foulkes of Cumnock. "
Division - View Video - View Transcript


Parliamentary Debates
Lord Mandelson: Response to Humble Address Motion
45 speeches (6,193 words)
Tuesday 17th March 2026 - Lords Chamber
Cabinet Office
Mentions:
1: Baroness McIntosh of Hudnall (Lab - Life peer) My Lords, the noble Lord, Lord Foulkes of Cumnock, is participating remotely and I invite him to speak - Link to Speech