Deputy Chairmen of Committees

Debate between Lord Foulkes of Cumnock and Lord Haskel
Monday 12th June 2023

(11 months, 1 week ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
Lord Haskel Portrait The Deputy Speaker (Lord Haskel) (Lab)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

Is it your Lordships’ pleasure that the four membership Motions be agreed?

Lord Foulkes of Cumnock Portrait Lord Foulkes of Cumnock (Lab Co-op)
- Hansard - -

My Lords, I object that the four appointments should be taken together.

Lord Haskel Portrait The Deputy Speaker (Lord Haskel) (Lab)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

Is it your Lordships’ pleasure that the first membership Motion be agreed?

Scotland: Meeting with New First Minister

Debate between Lord Foulkes of Cumnock and Lord Haskel
Wednesday 29th March 2023

(1 year, 1 month ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Lord Offord of Garvel Portrait The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State, Scotland Office (Lord Offord of Garvel) (Con)
- View Speech - Hansard - - - Excerpts

First, I offer my congratulations to Humza Yousaf on his appointment as First Minister of Scotland, having won the SNP leadership contest on a very close 52%-48% result with Kate Forbes.

On the Question, I know that the Secretary of State for Scotland and Prime Minister will be pleased to meet the First Minister in due course. Indeed, the UK Government remain committed to working constructively with the Scottish Government to handle the challenges that we both face. The Secretary of State for Scotland has been on record as saying that this is an excellent opportunity to press the reset button and make devolution work in Scotland, by the Scottish Government focusing on devolved matters and allowing the UK Government to focus on reserved matters. Perhaps I may make so bold as to ask the noble Lord, Lord Foulkes, what his first agenda item would be in that first meeting with the new First Minister.

Lord Foulkes of Cumnock Portrait Lord Foulkes of Cumnock (Lab Co-op)
- View Speech - Hansard - -

I will. I also send my congratulations to Humza Yousaf on taking over what I am afraid he is going to find is a poisoned chalice. When the Secretary of State meets the First Minister, will he say quite clearly to him that, if he is genuine and sincere in wanting to co-operate constructively with the UK Government, they should get round the table and find an agreed way forward on gender reform and container recycling that is applicable for the whole United Kingdom? Those are my first two priorities—instead of expensive legal action paid for by the UK taxpayer, which will benefit only the lawyers and extreme separatists.

Companies (Strategic Report) (Climate-related Financial Disclosure) Regulations 2021

Debate between Lord Foulkes of Cumnock and Lord Haskel
Monday 6th December 2021

(2 years, 5 months ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Lord Haskel Portrait The Deputy Speaker (Lord Haskel) (Lab)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

Is the noble Lord objecting to agreeing them en bloc?

Lord Haskel Portrait The Deputy Speaker (Lord Haskel) (Lab)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

My Lords, the Minister’s Motion to move these Motions en bloc has been objected to.

Lord Foulkes of Cumnock Portrait Lord Foulkes of Cumnock (Lab Co-op)
- Hansard - -

My Lords, I exercised the right that all noble Lords have to object to Motions being taken en bloc, not because I object to these two particular Motions being taken en bloc but because I object to the fact that, when the Leader of the House made a business statement earlier today, no other Member of the House was able to ask questions or make any comments. Yet it was a very substantial statement, and some of us wanted to point out that we object to decisions about who should speak virtually and who should speak in the Chamber being taken by a party-political representative—the Leader of the House—rather than by the Speaker. I was not able to make that comment; others wanted to make similar comments. I would like the Deputy Speaker, and anyone else who can, to raise the matter with the Lord Speaker, and I will do so myself. Perhaps the Minister will too. The issue is why there was no opportunity to question the Leader of the House when she made that business statement.