Information between 6th September 2026 - 26th September 2026
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
| Division Votes |
|---|
|
9 Sep 2026 - Financial Services and Markets Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Lord Harris of Haringey voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 131 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 196 Noes - 138 |
|
9 Sep 2026 - Financial Services and Markets Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Lord Harris of Haringey voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 127 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 194 Noes - 138 |
|
9 Sep 2026 - Financial Services and Markets Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Lord Harris of Haringey voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 142 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 226 Noes - 162 |
|
9 Sep 2026 - Financial Services and Markets Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Lord Harris of Haringey voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 150 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 248 Noes - 163 |
|
9 Sep 2026 - Financial Services and Markets Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Lord Harris of Haringey voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 120 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 188 Noes - 125 |
|
7 Sep 2026 - Financial Services and Markets Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Lord Harris of Haringey voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 144 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 76 Noes - 164 |
|
7 Sep 2026 - Financial Services and Markets Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Lord Harris of Haringey voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 149 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 247 Noes - 165 |
|
7 Sep 2026 - Financial Services and Markets Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Lord Harris of Haringey voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 115 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 26 Noes - 119 |
|
7 Sep 2026 - Financial Services and Markets Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Lord Harris of Haringey voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 151 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 69 Noes - 171 |
|
15 Sep 2026 - Financial Services and Markets Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Lord Harris of Haringey voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 156 Labour Aye votes vs 1 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 258 Noes - 109 |
| Speeches |
|---|
|
Lord Harris of Haringey speeches from: Procedure and Privileges
Lord Harris of Haringey contributed 1 speech (111 words) Wednesday 16th September 2026 - Lords Chamber |
|
Lord Harris of Haringey speeches from: UK Water Companies: Chinese Financial Influence
Lord Harris of Haringey contributed 1 speech (102 words) Tuesday 15th September 2026 - Lords Chamber Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs |
|
Lord Harris of Haringey speeches from: Jobcentre Plus and National Careers Service: Merger
Lord Harris of Haringey contributed 1 speech (78 words) Thursday 10th September 2026 - Lords Chamber Department for Work and Pensions |
|
Lord Harris of Haringey speeches from: El Niño
Lord Harris of Haringey contributed 1 speech (131 words) Tuesday 8th September 2026 - Lords Chamber Cabinet Office |
| Written Answers |
|---|
|
Ministry of Defence: Microsoft
Asked by: Lord Harris of Haringey (Labour - Life peer) Tuesday 22nd September 2026 Question to the Ministry of Defence: To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the Ministry of Defence's reliance on Microsoft products and cloud services; and what steps they are taking to ensure resilience and competition in the procurement of digital infrastructure. Answered by Lord Coaker - Minister of State (Ministry of Defence) Microsoft products and services provide core productivity, collaboration, cyber security and infrastructure capabilities across Defence and are critical to the operation of enterprise and operational ICT services. The Ministry of Defence's (MOD) use of Microsoft reflects long-standing operational, security and interoperability requirements. Microsoft technologies are widely used across Government and by NATO allies, supporting collaboration and interoperability. The MOD keeps its reliance on strategic technology suppliers under regular review and is pursuing a multi-cloud and hybrid-cloud strategy to strengthen resilience. |
|
Health Services: Digital Technology
Asked by: Lord Harris of Haringey (Labour - Life peer) Tuesday 22nd September 2026 Question to the Department of Health and Social Care: To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the reliance of the NHS on Microsoft products and cloud services; and what steps they are taking to ensure resilience and competition in the procurement of digital infrastructure. Answered by Baroness Merron - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department of Health and Social Care) No such assessment has taken place. The Government Commercial Agency acts for the Government to ensure there is resilience and competition in the choice of suppliers available to public sector bodies such as the National Health Service. This is through management of the Crown Commercial Service’s data and digital framework agreements which maintain a range of suppliers, organised by different skills and functions, from which organisations like the NHS use to ‘call-off’ work for specific contracts. In line with the Procurement Act 2023, all Government framework agreements are awarded in line with the principles of openness, fairness, and transparency, and for data and digital contracts, commercial experts use contract terms, data protection requirements, data protection impact assessments, cyber checks, and the Digital, Data and Technology Playbook to assess suppliers. The right test is whether a supplier can meet the NHS’s requirements on safety, data protection, security, service quality, and value for money. |