Lord Hendy of Richmond Hill

Alert Sample

View the Parallel Parliament page for Lord Hendy of Richmond Hill

Information between 11th January 2026 - 21st January 2026

Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.

Calendar
Monday 19th January 2026 Department for Transport Lord Hendy of Richmond Hill (Labour - Life peer) Statement - Main Chamber Subject: Northern Powerhouse Rail View calendar - Add to calendar
Tuesday 10th February 2026 Department for Transport Lord Hendy of Richmond Hill (Labour - Life peer) Legislation - Main Chamber Subject: Sustainable Aviation Fuel Bill – report stage Sustainable Aviation Fuel Bill 2024-26 View calendar - Add to calendar
Tuesday 24th February 2026 Department for Transport Lord Hendy of Richmond Hill (Labour - Life peer) Legislation - Main Chamber Subject: Sustainable Aviation Fuel Bill - third reading Sustainable Aviation Fuel Bill 2024-26 View calendar - Add to calendar

Division Votes
12 Jan 2026 - Diego Garcia Military Base and British Indian Ocean Territory Bill - View Vote Context Lord Hendy of Richmond Hill voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 147 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 201 Noes - 169
14 Jan 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context Lord Hendy of Richmond Hill voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 123 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 59 Noes - 127
19 Jan 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context Lord Hendy of Richmond Hill voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 149 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 159 Noes - 153
19 Jan 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context Lord Hendy of Richmond Hill voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 154 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 216 Noes - 161
19 Jan 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context Lord Hendy of Richmond Hill voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 155 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 232 Noes - 160
19 Jan 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context Lord Hendy of Richmond Hill voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 156 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 235 Noes - 164
19 Jan 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context Lord Hendy of Richmond Hill voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 151 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 148 Noes - 156

Speeches
Lord Hendy of Richmond Hill speeches from: Northern Powerhouse Rail Lord Hendy of Richmond Hill contributed 11 speeches (2,343 words) Monday 19th January 2026 - Lords Chamber Department for Transport

Lord Hendy of Richmond Hill mentioned

Parliamentary Debates
Railways Stations: Accessibility 1 speech (693 words) Thursday 15th January 2026 - Written Statements Department for Transport Mentions: 1: Simon Lightwood (LAB - Wakefield and Rothwell) The Minister of State for Transport, my noble Friend Lord Hendy of Richmond Hill, has made the following - Link to Speech

Select Committee Documents
Wednesday 21st January 2026 Correspondence - Letter from the Chief Executive, Office of Rail and Road relating to timetable changes on West Coast Main Line, dated 13 January 2026 Transport Committee Found: Page 11 of 12 Annex 2: Correspondence from Lord Hendy regarding the 07:00 service Lord Hendy of Richmond Hill
Wednesday 21st January 2026 Correspondence - Letter from the Minister for Rail relating to accessibility at stations, dated 15 January 2026 Transport Committee Found: Lord Hendy of Richmond Hill Minister of State for Rail Great Minster House 33 Horseferry Road

Written Answers
Old Oak Common Station Asked by: Baroness Pidgeon (Liberal Democrat - Life peer) Tuesday 20th January 2026 Question to the Department for Transport: To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Lord Hendy of Richmond Hill on 28 July 2025 (HL9776), what recent progress they have made towards ensuring that every platform has level boarding at the new Old Oak Common station. Answered by Lord Hendy of Richmond Hill - Minister of State (Department for Transport) Old Oak Common station will provide full street to platform step-free access, with HS2 platforms designed to offer full level boarding. Platforms serving the Elizabeth Line and conventional rail services have been designed to accommodate different kinds of rolling stock that have different boarding heights. Work to establish the feasibility and safety of deviating from standard 915mm platform heights on the relief line platforms (platforms 5-8, which will predominantly serve the Elizabeth Line) is continuing. Completed assessments to enable a final decision on this issue are expected by Spring 2026, with an announcement expected by the end of the year.

Written Answers

Old Oak Common Station
Asked by: Baroness Pidgeon (Liberal Democrat - Life peer)
Tuesday 20th January 2026

Question to the Department for Transport:

To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Lord Hendy of Richmond Hill on 28 July 2025 (HL9776), what recent progress they have made towards ensuring that every platform has level boarding at the new Old Oak Common station.

Answered by Lord Hendy of Richmond Hill - Minister of State (Department for Transport)

Old Oak Common station will provide full street to platform step-free access, with HS2 platforms designed to offer full level boarding. Platforms serving the Elizabeth Line and conventional rail services have been designed to accommodate different kinds of rolling stock that have different boarding heights. Work to establish the feasibility and safety of deviating from standard 915mm platform heights on the relief line platforms (platforms 5-8, which will predominantly serve the Elizabeth Line) is continuing. Completed assessments to enable a final decision on this issue are expected by Spring 2026, with an announcement expected by the end of the year.