To match an exact phrase, use quotation marks around the search term. eg. "Parliamentary Estate". Use "OR" or "AND" as link words to form more complex queries.


Keep yourself up-to-date with the latest developments by exploring our subscription options to receive notifications direct to your inbox

Written Question
Rules of Engagement
Wednesday 26th February 2020

Asked by: Lord Hodgson of Astley Abbotts (Conservative - Life peer)

Question to the Ministry of Defence:

To ask Her Majesty's Government, further to the remarks by Baroness Goldie on 16 January (HL Deb, col 861), on how many occasions UK personnel embedded in partner forces were given permission for "unagreed operations" in (1) 2016, (2) 2017, and (3) 2018.

Answered by Baroness Goldie - Shadow Minister (Defence)

The Department does not hold these details centrally and they could only be provided at disproportionate cost. The parameters of an embeds duties are agreed before deployment. Should the host nation wish to change these after deployment the embed will seek further clearance from the MOD. As such, there are no 'unagreed operations' undertaken by UK Armed Forces embedded in our allies' Armed Forces. The reply given during the debate of 16 January was to assure the noble Lords that checks and balances are in place to protect our personnel and to ensure that they remain compliant with UK law and any policy restrictions we may place upon them.


Written Question
Abdul Reza Shahlai
Wednesday 26th February 2020

Asked by: Lord Hodgson of Astley Abbotts (Conservative - Life peer)

Question to the Ministry of Defence:

To ask Her Majesty's Government whether the Ministry of Defence was informed of the operation to target Abdul Reza Shahlai in Yemen on 3 January before the failed strike took place; and if so, whether it provided any material support to that action.

Answered by Baroness Goldie - Shadow Minister (Defence)

We do not comment on our allies' operational decisions.


Speech in Lords Chamber - Thu 16 Jan 2020
Drones: International Law

"To ask Her Majesty’s Government what assessment they have made of the implications of the use of drones to assassinate Qasem Soleimani for existing agreements on the use of drones...."
Lord Hodgson of Astley Abbotts - View Speech

View all Lord Hodgson of Astley Abbotts (Con - Life peer) contributions to the debate on: Drones: International Law

Speech in Lords Chamber - Thu 16 Jan 2020
Drones: International Law

"My Lords, I begin by drawing the House’s attention to two of my interests. I am an officer of both the All-Party Parliamentary Group on Drones and the All-Party Parliamentary Group on Extraordinary Rendition.

The expanding use of drones and its implication for the legal framework that covers their operation …..."

Lord Hodgson of Astley Abbotts - View Speech

View all Lord Hodgson of Astley Abbotts (Con - Life peer) contributions to the debate on: Drones: International Law

Speech in Lords Chamber - Thu 16 Jan 2020
Drones: International Law

"I know that my noble friend is doing a valiant job, but one of the problems that we have is: yes, we are getting assurances, but is the red card ever used? Has it ever been used? I am not asking where it has been used or in what circumstances, …..."
Lord Hodgson of Astley Abbotts - View Speech

View all Lord Hodgson of Astley Abbotts (Con - Life peer) contributions to the debate on: Drones: International Law

Written Question
Yemen: Unmanned Air Vehicles
Tuesday 16th April 2019

Asked by: Lord Hodgson of Astley Abbotts (Conservative - Life peer)

Question to the Ministry of Defence:

To ask Her Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the UK's involvement in drone activities in the Yemen following the ruling of the Higher Administrative Court in Münster in the case of bin Ali Jaber vs Germany.

Answered by Earl Howe - Shadow Deputy Leader of the House of Lords

Any use of force by the UK complies fully with UK domestic and applicable international law.

We are aware of the ruling by the German Higher Administrative Court on 19 March 2019 that Germany has a responsibility for ensuring that United States (US) operations conducted from German territory accord with international law. The Court also held that a lower Court had correctly deemed the case inadmissible, on the grounds that it could not be proved that the plaintiff's father was killed by a US drone strike on the day in question in 2012. The Court also stated that it could not be proved that the German government had knowledge of the use of Ramstein for drone strikes in 2012.


Speech in Lords Chamber - Wed 31 Oct 2018
Counter-Terrorism and Border Security Bill

"My Lords, I have added my name to Amendment 34. I begin by apologising to the Committee for not having participated at Second Reading, although I have taken care to read the transcript very carefully.

My noble friend Lord Faulks has given a clear and brilliant explanation of the unsatisfactory …..."

Lord Hodgson of Astley Abbotts - View Speech

View all Lord Hodgson of Astley Abbotts (Con - Life peer) contributions to the debate on: Counter-Terrorism and Border Security Bill

Written Question
Special Forces
Thursday 22nd December 2016

Asked by: Lord Hodgson of Astley Abbotts (Conservative - Life peer)

Question to the Ministry of Defence:

To ask Her Majesty’s Government whether consideration is being given to the establishment of a parliamentary committee to oversee special forces operations in a closed and confidential setting.

Answered by Earl Howe - Shadow Deputy Leader of the House of Lords

It is a longstanding position that Her Majesty's Government does not comment on Special Forces related activity.

I refer my noble Friend to the answer given by my right hon. Friend the Secretary of State for Defence (Sir Michael Fallon) to Question 41980 on 11 July 2016.


Written Question
Special Forces
Wednesday 21st December 2016

Asked by: Lord Hodgson of Astley Abbotts (Conservative - Life peer)

Question to the Ministry of Defence:

To ask Her Majesty’s Government whether UK special forces have adopted new rules of engagement as a result of concerns about prosecution for war crimes.

Answered by Earl Howe - Shadow Deputy Leader of the House of Lords

It is a long-standing Government policy not to comment on specific Rules of Engagement. However, UK Forces will always operate in accordance with UK law and with the UK's interpretation of international law.


Written Question
Islamic State: British Nationals Abroad
Tuesday 20th December 2016

Asked by: Lord Hodgson of Astley Abbotts (Conservative - Life peer)

Question to the Ministry of Defence:

To ask Her Majesty’s Government whether, in the event that British nationals involved with Islamic State in Iraq or Syria are captured by British forces in those countries, they will be handed over to local authorities.

Answered by Earl Howe - Shadow Deputy Leader of the House of Lords

British forces in Iraq are operating in a training and advisory capacity only. As such they are not expected to come into contact with British nationals involved with Daesh. In the unlikely event that this was to occur they would revert to the Ministry of Defence who would provide advice on a case by case basis.