Information between 8th March 2026 - 18th March 2026
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
| Division Votes |
|---|
|
10 Mar 2026 - Victims and Courts Bill - View Vote Context Lord Holmes of Richmond voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 128 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 189 Noes - 157 |
|
10 Mar 2026 - Victims and Courts Bill - View Vote Context Lord Holmes of Richmond voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 160 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 252 Noes - 171 |
|
10 Mar 2026 - Victims and Courts Bill - View Vote Context Lord Holmes of Richmond voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 165 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 257 Noes - 174 |
|
10 Mar 2026 - Victims and Courts Bill - View Vote Context Lord Holmes of Richmond voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 172 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 273 Noes - 180 |
|
10 Mar 2026 - Victims and Courts Bill - View Vote Context Lord Holmes of Richmond voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 148 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 216 Noes - 170 |
|
9 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Lord Holmes of Richmond voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 162 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 200 Noes - 162 |
|
11 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Lord Holmes of Richmond voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 41 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 44 Noes - 153 |
|
11 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Lord Holmes of Richmond voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 149 Conservative Aye votes vs 1 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 163 Noes - 153 |
|
11 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Lord Holmes of Richmond voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 181 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 215 Noes - 180 |
|
11 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Lord Holmes of Richmond voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 178 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 227 Noes - 221 |
|
16 Mar 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context Lord Holmes of Richmond voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 183 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 276 Noes - 165 |
|
16 Mar 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context Lord Holmes of Richmond voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 182 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 201 Noes - 177 |
|
16 Mar 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context Lord Holmes of Richmond voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 181 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 198 Noes - 171 |
| Speeches |
|---|
|
Lord Holmes of Richmond speeches from: Media Literacy (Communications and Digital Committee Report)
Lord Holmes of Richmond contributed 1 speech (805 words) Monday 16th March 2026 - Grand Committee |
| Written Answers |
|---|
|
Digital Technology: Human Rights
Asked by: Lord Holmes of Richmond (Conservative - Life peer) Monday 9th March 2026 Question to the Department for Science, Innovation & Technology: To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of Demos report A Declaration on Digital Rights: Embedding human rights in a new deal for the digital age, published on 10 February; and what steps they are taking to embed human rights protections in the UK’s regulatory approach to technology and AI. Answered by Baroness Lloyd of Effra - Baroness in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip) We are committed to embedding human rights protections across the UK’s approach to regulating technology and AI. The UK already complies with human rights obligations including via the Human Rights Act (HRA) 1998. Individuals can uphold those rights in UK courts, which have always interpreted the rights set out in the European Convention on Human Rights and applied under the HRA in a flexible way that keeps up with new technology. The UK has helped to shape the passage of key international AI initiatives, such as signing the Council of Europe’s AI Convention. This is the world’s first legally binding agreement on AI grounded in human rights, democracy and the rule of law. We will implement the Convention in a proportionate, innovation-friendly way, leveraging our existing human rights framework and sector-led regulation to safeguard rights while supporting growth. |
|
Artificial Intelligence: Safety
Asked by: Lord Holmes of Richmond (Conservative - Life peer) Friday 13th March 2026 Question to the Department for Science, Innovation & Technology: To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the remarks by Lord Leong on 3 February (HL Deb col 1434) about the use of the SPACE framework to ensure safety, transparency and accountability for AI, in which publication, document or statement they set out that approach; and what activity they have taken to implement it. Answered by Baroness Lloyd of Effra - Baroness in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip) The Government’s response to the AI Opportunities Action Plan outlines our regulatory approach to strengthening AI safety, security and robustness. We have accepted - and are acting on - recommendations to enhance regulatory capabilities. We have also announced a new Centre for AI Measurement to develop new AI assurance tools and strengthen the UK AI Assurance ecosystem; committed to ensuring that the AI Security Institute has the ability to deliver on its responsibilities, is trusted by others, and works well with partners; and concluded a call for evidence on the AI Growth Lab, a cross-economy AI sandbox, to inform further development, and identify priority areas for its focus. The Regulatory Innovation Office supports the government’s pro‑innovation approach to regulation by working with businesses and regulators to cut approval times for innovation and technologies while maintaining safety and public confidence. The Regulatory Innovation Office also coordinates cross‑government action to remove regulatory barriers to growth. Through such initiatives, the Government has taken important steps to ensure that most AI systems are already regulated at the point of use by our existing expert regulators. We are closely following how the technology develops, and where further action may be required. |
| Parliamentary Debates |
|---|
|
Media Literacy (Communications and Digital Committee Report)
42 speeches (15,850 words) Monday 16th March 2026 - Grand Committee Mentions: 1: Lord Parkinson of Whitley Bay (Con - Life peer) As my noble friend Lord Holmes of Richmond noted, the Government are moving painfully slowly in the face - Link to Speech |
| Calendar |
|---|
|
Tuesday 21st April 2026 2 p.m. Communications and Digital Committee - Private Meeting View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Tuesday 14th April 2026 2 p.m. Communications and Digital Committee - Private Meeting View calendar - Add to calendar |