Information between 6th March 2024 - 15th April 2024
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
| Division Votes |
|---|
|
6 Mar 2024 - Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill - View Vote Context Lord Lansley voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 167 Conservative No votes vs 4 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 278 Noes - 189 |
|
6 Mar 2024 - Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill - View Vote Context Lord Lansley voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 165 Conservative No votes vs 2 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 265 Noes - 181 |
|
11 Mar 2024 - Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Bill - View Vote Context Lord Lansley voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 178 Conservative No votes vs 3 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 204 Noes - 192 |
|
11 Mar 2024 - Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Bill - View Vote Context Lord Lansley voted Aye - against a party majority and in line with the House One of 4 Conservative Aye votes vs 180 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 209 Noes - 193 |
|
11 Mar 2024 - Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Bill - View Vote Context Lord Lansley voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 178 Conservative No votes vs 2 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 199 Noes - 199 |
|
11 Mar 2024 - Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Bill - View Vote Context Lord Lansley voted Aye - against a party majority and in line with the House One of 5 Conservative Aye votes vs 180 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 217 Noes - 192 |
|
11 Mar 2024 - Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Bill - View Vote Context Lord Lansley voted Aye - against a party majority and in line with the House One of 4 Conservative Aye votes vs 175 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 202 Noes - 187 |
|
20 Mar 2024 - Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill - View Vote Context Lord Lansley voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 201 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 249 Noes - 219 |
|
20 Mar 2024 - Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill - View Vote Context Lord Lansley voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 205 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 263 Noes - 233 |
|
20 Mar 2024 - Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill - View Vote Context Lord Lansley voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 203 Conservative No votes vs 1 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 276 Noes - 226 |
|
20 Mar 2024 - Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill - View Vote Context Lord Lansley voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 196 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 248 Noes - 209 |
|
20 Mar 2024 - Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill - View Vote Context Lord Lansley voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 208 Conservative No votes vs 1 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 285 Noes - 230 |
|
20 Mar 2024 - Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill - View Vote Context Lord Lansley voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 203 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 271 Noes - 228 |
|
20 Mar 2024 - Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill - View Vote Context Lord Lansley voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 200 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 251 Noes - 214 |
| Parliamentary Debates |
|---|
|
Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Bill
36 speeches (8,195 words) 3rd reading Tuesday 26th March 2024 - Lords Chamber Department for Business and Trade Mentions: 1: Lord Clement-Jones (LD - Life peer) going to take many more excuses in future.I very much hope that, as the noble Lords, Lord Faulks and Lord - Link to Speech 2: Lord Parkinson of Whitley Bay (Con - Life peer) As my noble friend Lord Lansley pointed out, there are specific additional protections through the regime - Link to Speech 3: Lord Offord of Garvel (Con - Life peer) emphasise my gratitude to the noble Lords, Lord Faulks, Lord Tyrie, Lord Kamall, Lord Holmes of Richmond, Lord - Link to Speech |
|
Comprehensive and Progressive Trans-Pacific Partnership (IAC Report)
41 speeches (20,280 words) Tuesday 19th March 2024 - Lords Chamber Department for Business and Trade Mentions: 1: Lord Anderson of Swansea (Lab - Life peer) I differ from the noble Lord, Lord Lansley, only in that he was a member of the committee, heard the - Link to Speech 2: Lord Purvis of Tweed (LD - Life peer) The noble Lord, Lord Lansley, believes that will be the floor, not the ceiling, of the ambition. - Link to Speech 3: Lord Kerr of Kinlochard (XB - Life peer) Here I disagree with the noble Lord, Lord Lansley. - Link to Speech 4: Lord Udny-Lister (Con - Life peer) It is right to point out, as did the noble Lord, Lord Lansley, that we are now at a stage where world - Link to Speech |
|
Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Bill
110 speeches (25,012 words) Report stage Wednesday 13th March 2024 - Lords Chamber Department for Business and Trade Mentions: 1: Lord Bassam of Brighton (Lab - Life peer) Bill, and I strongly suspect we will revisit this on other occasions in the future, as the noble Lord, Lord - Link to Speech 2: Lord Clement-Jones (LD - Life peer) future-proofing that my amendment seeks for digital media.I very much appreciate what the noble Lords, Lord - Link to Speech 3: Lord Parkinson of Whitley Bay (Con - Life peer) I am happy to speak with my noble friend Lord Lansley and others about it. - Link to Speech |
|
Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Bill
121 speeches (23,637 words) Report stage Monday 11th March 2024 - Lords Chamber Department for Business and Trade Mentions: 1: Lord Faulks (Non-affiliated - Life peer) In Grand Committee, the noble Lord, Lord Lansley, referred to a letter from the Minister about the change - Link to Speech 2: None Therefore, if my noble friend Lord Lansley pushes his Amendment 56 to a Division, I will support him. - Link to Speech 3: Viscount Colville of Culross (XB - Excepted Hereditary) If not, I will support the noble Lord, Lord Lansley, should he decide to test the opinion of the House - Link to Speech 4: Lord Wolfson of Tredegar (Con - Life peer) The noble Lord, Lord Faulks, and my noble friend Lord Lansley eloquently set out the consequences of - Link to Speech 5: Lord Clement-Jones (LD - Life peer) We agree with the conclusions of the original task force.We also support the noble Lord, Lord Lansley - Link to Speech |
| Bill Documents |
|---|
|
Mar. 27 2024
Bill 198 EN 2023-24 Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Bill 2022-23 Explanatory Notes Found: • Lords Amendment 38 was tabled by Lord Lansley and was opposed by the Government. |
|
Mar. 08 2024
HL Bill 47-I(Rev) Revised marshalled list for Report Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Bill 2022-23 Amendment Paper Found: LORD LANSLEY 16_ Clause 20 page 12, line 32, at end insert— “(ca) imposing fees or charges on |
|
Mar. 07 2024
HL Bill 47-I Marshalled list for Report Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Bill 2022-23 Amendment Paper Found: LORD LANSLEY 16_ Clause 20 page 12, line 32, at end insert— “(ca) imposing fees or charges on |
|
Mar. 06 2024
HL Bill 47 Running list of amendments Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Bill 2022-23 Amendment Paper Found: LANSLEY _ Clause 20 page 12, line 32, at end insert— “(ca) imposing fees or charges on users |