To match an exact phrase, use quotation marks around the search term. eg. "Parliamentary Estate". Use "OR" or "AND" as link words to form more complex queries.


Keep yourself up-to-date with the latest developments by exploring our subscription options to receive notifications direct to your inbox

Written Question
Judiciary
Wednesday 14th December 2016

Asked by: Lord Lester of Herne Hill (Non-affiliated - Life peer)

Question to the Ministry of Justice:

To ask Her Majesty’s Government, further to the Written Answer by Lord Keen of Elie on 22 November (HL3029), where in the <i>Cabinet Manual </i>criteria or guidance are given about how the Lord Chancellor and other Ministers should perform their duty under section 3 of the Constitutional Reform Act 2005 to uphold the independence of the judiciary.

Answered by Lord Keen of Elie - Shadow Minister (Justice)

Paragraph 16 of the introduction and Chapter 6 of the Cabinet Manual make clear that it is a long-established constitutional principle that the judiciary is independent of both the government of the day and Parliament. This is to ensure the even-handed administration of justice.


Written Question
Judiciary
Tuesday 22nd November 2016

Asked by: Lord Lester of Herne Hill (Non-affiliated - Life peer)

Question to the Ministry of Justice:

To ask Her Majesty’s Government to what criteria or guidance they have regard in performing their duty under section 3 of the Constitutional Reform Act 2005 to uphold the independence of the judiciary.

Answered by Lord Keen of Elie - Shadow Minister (Justice)

The Cabinet Manual makes clear reference to judicial independence. All ministers have access to legal advice in relation to their statutory duties where necessary, including advice where appropriate from the Law Officers.


Written Question
Judiciary
Monday 21st November 2016

Asked by: Lord Lester of Herne Hill (Non-affiliated - Life peer)

Question to the Ministry of Justice:

To ask Her Majesty’s Government what steps the Lord Chancellor intends to take, in relation to public attacks on the judiciary following the judgment of the High Court of Justice on 3 November, to uphold the rule of law and the independence of the judiciary.

Answered by Lord Keen of Elie - Shadow Minister (Justice)

The Lord Chancellor has made clear in a number of statements that she considers an independent judiciary to be the cornerstone of the rule of law, and that it is her duty to defend that independence.


Speech in Lords Chamber - Thu 14 Jul 2016
Courts: Resourcing and Staffing

"My Lords, I congratulate the noble and learned Lord, Lord Woolf, on organising and leading this debate, and the Woolf judicial quintet, who we are privileged to hear and enjoy. I also congratulate the new Lord Chancellor and Justice Secretary on her appointment and wish her a successful period in …..."
Lord Lester of Herne Hill - View Speech

View all Lord Lester of Herne Hill (Non-affiliated - Life peer) contributions to the debate on: Courts: Resourcing and Staffing

Written Question
Immigration: Appeals
Thursday 5th May 2016

Asked by: Lord Lester of Herne Hill (Non-affiliated - Life peer)

Question to the Ministry of Justice:

To ask Her Majesty’s Government why they propose to increase immigration and asylum chamber fees, and what assessment they have made of the likely impact of those increased fees on access to justice.

Answered by Lord Faulks

We’re protecting the most vulnerable from any fee increase, including those who receive asylum support and cases involving children being supported or housed by a local authority. But it is also right that the taxpayer does not subsidise those who choose to challenge a decision made by the Home Office before the Tribunal.

We have a duty to the public to reduce the deficit and ensure sustainable funding for Her Majesty’s Courts and Tribunal Service.

We have published a full impact assessment alongside the consultation document published on the Government website.


Written Question
Prisons: Islam
Tuesday 3rd May 2016

Asked by: Lord Lester of Herne Hill (Non-affiliated - Life peer)

Question to the Ministry of Justice:

To ask Her Majesty’s Government when they will publish the report by Ian Acheson into the role of Muslim clerics in prisons in England and Wales.

Answered by Lord Faulks

My Rt hon Friend the Secretary of State for Justice is currently considering the recommendations of the review of Extremism. As the Secretary of State told the House on 26 April, a summary document will be published in due course. The full report cannot be published due to sensitive security issues.


Written Question
Prisons: Islam
Tuesday 3rd May 2016

Asked by: Lord Lester of Herne Hill (Non-affiliated - Life peer)

Question to the Ministry of Justice:

To ask Her Majesty’s Government who is responsible for the appointment of prison imams.

Answered by Lord Faulks

Prison Governors are responsible for appointing all Chaplains into prison based roles.

In order to ensure our current practice is as robust and effective as possible in dealing with extremism in prison, the Justice Secretary commissioned a review, supported by external expertise, of the overall approach to dealing with Islamist extremism in prisons, probation and the youth justice system and is currently considering the recommendations.


Written Question
Employment Tribunals Service: Fees and Charges
Monday 11th April 2016

Asked by: Lord Lester of Herne Hill (Non-affiliated - Life peer)

Question to the Ministry of Justice:

To ask Her Majesty’s Government when they plan to publish their review of the impact of fees on the tribunal system.

Answered by Lord Faulks

We will announce the conclusions of our review of fees in the Employment Tribunals in due course.


Written Question
Human Rights Act 1998
Monday 11th April 2016

Asked by: Lord Lester of Herne Hill (Non-affiliated - Life peer)

Question to the Ministry of Justice:

To ask Her Majesty’s Government, in considering the future of the Human Rights Act 1998, what regard they will have to the findings of the Scottish Parliament’s European and External Relations Committee as outlined in the letter of 17 March from the Convener of that Committee to the Lord Chancellor in respect of the relevance of the specific position of Scotland in the devolution settlement and the role of the Sewel Convention.

Answered by Lord Faulks

This Government was elected with a mandate to reform and modernise the UK human rights framework. We will consider the devolution implications of our reforms and will continue to engage fully with stakeholders in Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland, and with the devolved administrations, as we develop our proposals.


Written Question
Human Rights Act 1998
Monday 11th April 2016

Asked by: Lord Lester of Herne Hill (Non-affiliated - Life peer)

Question to the Ministry of Justice:

To ask Her Majesty’s Government, in considering the future of the Human Rights Act 1998, what regard they will have to the findings of the Scottish Parliament’s European and External Relations Committee as outlined in the letter of 17 March from the Convener of that Committee to the Lord Chancellor on the concept of "mission creep" as a characterisation of the European Court on Human Rights’ jurisprudence.

Answered by Lord Faulks

This Government was elected with a mandate to reform and modernise the UK human rights framework. We will consider the devolution implications of our reforms and will continue to engage fully with stakeholders in Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland, and with the devolved administrations, as we develop our proposals.